Abstract
Foundationalist theories of justification for science were undermined by the theory-ladeness thesis, which has affinities with coherentist epistemologies. A challenge for defenders of coherentist theories of scientific justification is to specify coherence relations relevant to science and to show how these relations make the truth of their bearers likely. Coherence relations include characteristics that pick out better explanations in the implementation of abductive arguments. Empiricist philosophers have attacked abductive reasoning by claiming that explanatory virtues are pragmatic, having no implications regarding truth. However, empiricist's basic beliefs are subject to the same challenges facing abduction, both of which can be met by citing causally coherent etiologies, which are commonplace in biological explanations, and by demonstrating the relevance of causal coherence to truth.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Carson H.L. and Templeton A.R. 1984. 'Genetic Revolutions in Relation to Speciation Phenomena: The Founding of New Populations'. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 15: 97-131.
Dennet D.C. 1993. Darwin's Dangerous Idea. Touchstone Books, New York.
Feyerabend P.K. 1962. 'Explanation, Reduction and Empiricism'. In: Feigl H. and Maxwell G. (eds), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science Vol. III. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
Hanson N.R. 1961. Patterns of Discovery. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
Kitcher P. 1993. The Advancement of Science. Oxford University Press, New York.
Kleiner S.A. 1985. 'Darwin's and Wallace's Revolutionary Research Programme'. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 36: 367-392.
Kuhn T.S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Laudan L. 1977. Progress and Its Problems. University of California Press, Berkeley.
Lloyd E. 1983. 'The Nature of Darwin's Support for the Theory of Natural Selection'. Philosophy of Science 50: 112-129.
Mayr E. 1954. 'Change of genetic environment and evolution'. In: Huxley J.S., Hardy A.C. and Ford E.B (eds), Evolution as a Process. Allen & Unwin, London, pp. 156-180.
Mayr E. 1963. Animal Species and Evolution. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA.
Peirce C. 1960. The Collected Works of C.S. Peirce. In: Hartshorne C. (ed.), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Ruse M. 1975. 'Charles Darwin's Theory of Evolution: An Analysis'. Journal of the History of Biology 8: 219-241.
Ruse M. 1979. Philosophical Factors in the Darwinian Revolution. In: Wilson F. (ed.), Pragmatism and Purpose. University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
Ruse M. 1999. Mystery of Mysteries. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Sober E. 1993. The Philosophy of Biology. Hackett, Indianapolis, IN.
Thagard P. 1992. Conceptual Revolutions in Science. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kleiner, S.A. Explanatory coherence and empirical adequacy: The problem of abduction, and the justification of evolutionary models. Biology & Philosophy 18, 513–527 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025523022460
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025523022460