Skip to main content
Log in

Two Information Measures for Inconsistent Sets

  • Published:
Journal of Logic, Language and Information Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

I present two measures of information for both consistentand inconsistent sets of sentences in a finite language ofpropositional logic. The measures of information are based onmeasures of inconsistency developed in Knight (2002).Relative information measures are then provided corresponding to thetwo information measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • de Finetti, B., 1931, “Sul significato soggettivo dell probabilitá,” Fundamenta Mathematicae 17, 298–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J.M., 1976, “Intuitive semantics for first-degree entailments and ‘coupled trees',” Philosophical Studies 29, 149–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J., 1970, “On semantic information,” pp. 3–27 in Information and Inference, J. Hintikka and P. Suppes, eds., Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaynes, E.T., 1957, “Information theory and statistical mechanics,” Physical Review 106, 620–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemeny, J.G., 1953, “A logical measure function,” Journal of Symbolic Logic 18, 289–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kincaid, D.R. and Cheney, E.W., 1996, Numerical Analysis: Mathematics of Scientific Computing, 2nd edition, Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, K.M., 2002, “Measuring inconsistency,” Journal of Philosophical Logic 31, 77–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lozinskii, E.L., 1994a, “Information and evidence in logic systems,” Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 6, 163–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lozinskii, E.L., 1994b, “Resolving contradictions: A plausible semantics for inconsistent systems,” Journal of Automated Reasoning 12, 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, J.B., 1994, The Uncertain Reasoner's Companion: A Mathematical Perspective, Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science, No. 39, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, J.B., 1999, “Common sense and maximum entropy,” Synthese 117, 75–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, J.B., 2001, “A note on the Dutch Book method,” pp. 301–306 in Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Imprecise Probabilities and their Applications, G. de Cooman, T. L. Fine, and T. Seidenfeld, eds., Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, J.B. and Vencovská, A., 1998, “Proof systems for probabilistic uncertain reasoning,” Journal of Symbolic Logic 63(3), 1007–1039.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priest, G., 1979, “Logic of paradox,” Journal of Philosophical Logic 8, 219–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J., 1971, A Theory of Justice, Cambridge: Belknap.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, N. and Manor, R., 1970, “On inference from inconsistent premisses,” Theory and Decision 1, 179–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, L., 2000, “Maybe, maybe not: Probabilistic semantics for two paraconsistent logics,” pp. 233–254 in Frontiers of Paraconsistent Logics, D. Batens, C. Mortensen, G. Priest, and J.-P. van Bendegem, eds., Studies in Logic and Computation, Vol. 8, Baldock: Research Studies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C.E. and Weaver, W., 1949, The Mathematical Theory of Communication, Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shore, J.E. and Johnson, R.W., 1980, “Axiomatic derivation of the principle of maximum entropy and the principle of minimum crossentropy,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory IT–26, 26–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppes, P., 1966, “Probabilistic inference and the concept of total evidence,” pp. 49–65 in Aspects of Inductive Logic, J. Hintikka and P. Suppes, eds., Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Knight, K.M. Two Information Measures for Inconsistent Sets. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 12, 227–248 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022351919320

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022351919320

Navigation