Skip to main content
Log in

The Failure of Trust-Based Retributivism

  • Published:
Law and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

REFERENCES

  • Baier, A., ‘Trust and Anti-Trust’, Ethics 96/2 (1986): 231–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baier, A., ‘What do Women Want in a Moral Theory?’, Nous 19/1 (1985): 53–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimock, S., ‘Retributivism and Trust’, Law and Philosophy 16/1 (1997): 37–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavison, R., ‘Punishment and Theories of Justice: Comments on Sadurski and Hoekema’, Israel Law Review 25/3 (1991): 351–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoekema, D. A., ‘Trust and Obey: Toward a New Theory of Punishment’, Israel Law Review 25/3 (1991): 332–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, M. A., ‘Utilitarianism and Retributivism: What's the Difference?’, American Philosophical Quarterly 29/2 (1992): 173–182.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Korman, D. The Failure of Trust-Based Retributivism. Law and Philosophy 22, 561–575 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025988423748

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025988423748

Keywords

Navigation