Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On the antinomies and the appendix to the dialectic in Kant's critique and philosophy of science

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adickes, E.: 1896, ‘Die bewegenden Kräfte in Kants philosophischer Entwicklung u.d. beiden Pole seines Systems’,Kant-St. I.

  • Adickes, E.: 1920, ‘Kants Opus postumum’,Kant-St. Erg. H. 50.

  • Adickes, E.: 1924,Kant und das Ding an sich, Berlin.

  • Adickes, E.: 1927,Kant und die Als-Ob-Philosophie, Stgt.

  • Ashby, W. R.: 1958:Introduction to Cybernetics, London.

  • Bennett, J.: 1974,Kant's Dialectic, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchdahl, G.: 1967, ‘The Relation between “Understanding” and “Reason” in the Architectonic of Kant's Philosophy’,Proc. Artist. Soc. 67, 209–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchdahl, G.: 1969,Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, Chapter VIII, esp. Section 4c.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchdahl, G.: 1972, ‘The Conception of Lawlikeness in Kant's Philosophy of Science’,Proc. IIIrd. Int. Kant Congress, Reidel, Dordrecht; also in L. W. Beck (ed.), 1974,Kant's Theory of Knowledge, Reidel, Dordrecht, esp. Section III.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdmann, B.: 1878,Historische Erläuterungen zu Immanuel Kants Prolegomena zu einer jeden künftigen Metaphysik, die als Wissenschaft wird auftreten können, hg. v. B. Erdmann, Leipzig.

  • Ewing, A. C.: 1938,A Short Commentary on Kant's Critique of Pure Reason, U. Chic. Pr., esp. Chapt. V–VII.

  • Heimsoeth, H.,Transzendentale Dialektik. Ein Kommentar z. Kants Kr. V. Teil I–III. Bln. 1966–68. esp. Introduction, I. Book and Appendix.

  • Hinske, N.: 1966, ‘Kants Begriff der Antinomie und die Etappen seiner Umarbeitung’,Kant-St. 56, 485–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinske, N.: 1970,Kants Weg zur Transzendentalphilosophie, Stuttgart.

  • Kingeling, W.: 1961,Die Antinomien in Kants drei Kritiken und das Ding-an-sich-Problem. Diss. Hbg.

  • Körner, St.: 1955,Kant, Harmondworth, esp. Chap. 5.

  • Krausser, P.:Kants Theorie der Erfahrung und Erfahrungswissenschaft, Kolsterm.

  • Krausser, P.: 1982, ‘The First Antinomy of Rational Cosmology and Kant's Three Kinds of Infinities’,Philos. Naturalis 19(1/2), 83–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krausser, P.: 1972, ‘Kant's Theory of the Structure of Empirical Scientific Inquiry and Two Implied Postulates Regarding Things in Themselves.Proc. IIIrd Int. Kant Congress, Reidel, Dordrecht; also in: L. W. Beck, (ed.),Kant's Theory of Knowledge, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1974; elaborated in Chapter I of Krausser (1982).

  • Krausser, P.: 1985, ‘Kant On The Hypothetical Employment of Reason in Science’, forthcoming asContributed Paper, 6th Int. Kant Congr. 1985.

  • Krausser, P.: ‘Über den hypothetischen Vernuftgebrauch in der Kritik der reinen Vernunft’, forthcoming in:Archiv f. Geschichte der Philosophie.

  • Prauß, G.: 1974, ‘Zur Problematik der Dinge an sich’, in G. Funke (ed.),Akten d. 4.Int. Kant Kongr., Teil I, S. 263–282, Berlin/New York.

  • Riehl, A.:Der philosophische Kritizismus. Bd. 1–3, Leipzig2 1908–26.

  • Schmucker, J.: 1974, ‘Zur Entwicklungsgeschichtlichen Bedeutung der Inaugural Dissertation von 1770’, in G. Funke (ed.),Akten d. 4.Int. Kant Kongr., Teil I, S. 263–282, Berlin/New York.

  • Schrader, G. A.: 1949, ‘The Thing in Itself in Kantian Philosophy’,Rev. of Metaphysics,II, 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stegmüller, W.: 1967, ‘Gedanken über mögliche rationale Rekonstruktion von Kants Metaphysik der Erfahrung’, Teil I,Ratio 9, 1–3; Teil II:Ratio 10, 1968, 1–31; also in: ders.,Aufs. z. Kant u. Wittgenstein. Darmstadt 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uehling, T. E.: 1974, ‘Kant, Disguised Nonsense and Patent-Nonsense’, in G. Funke (ed.),Akten d. 4.Int. Kant Kongr, Berlin/New York.

  • Laudan, L.: 1981,Science and Hypothesis. Historical Essays on Scientific Methodology, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whewell, W.: 1967,Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences, Lond. 1840,2/847 repr. 1967 (of the second edition).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Philosophie, Freie Universität Belin, Habelschwedter Allee 30, 1000 Berlin 33, Berlin, BRD

    Peter Krausser

Authors
  1. Peter Krausser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

I wish to thank my student and young teaching colleague, Ms. Susan Neiman for her very helpful and stimulating discussions. Not only has she gone over the manuscript of this paper to prevent at least the worst stylistic blunders in my English, but she also helped me with her critical philosophic objections and questions in several places to correct my thinking. Needless to say, she bears no responsibility for anything objectionable that still may be found in the article. I also want to thank a critical but sympathetic referee of this journal. Reacting to his excellent questions and remarks has, I hope, helped me to make some important points more explicit and clear, and to eliminate sources of potential misunderstanding.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krausser, P. On the antinomies and the appendix to the dialectic in Kant's critique and philosophy of science. Synthese 77, 375–401 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00869292

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00869292

Search

Navigation