Abstract
Aristotle's illustrations of the fallacy of Figure of Speech (or Form of Expression) are none too convincing. They are tied to Aristotle's theory of categories and to peculiarities of Greek grammar that fail to hold appeal for a contemporary readership. Yet, upon closer inspection, Figure of Speech shows many points of contact with views and problems that inhabit 20th-century analytical philosophy. In the paper, some Aristotelian examples will be analyzed to gain a better understanding of this fallacy. The case of the Third Man argument and some modern cases lend plausibility to the claim that Figure of Speech is of more interest as a type of fallacy than has generally been assumed. Finally, a case is made for the view that Figure of Speech, though listed among the fallacies dependent upon language, is not properly classified as a fallacy of ambiguity. More likely, it should be looked upon as a type of non sequitur. This has important consequences for the profile of dialogue associated with this fallacy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Aristotle: 1928, The Works of Aristotle Translated into English, Vol. I (W. D. Ross, ed.), Oxford University Press, Oxford, and Geoffrey Cumberlege, London.
Aristotle: 1958, Aristotelis Topica et Sophistici Elenchi(W. D. Ross, ed.), Clarendon Press, Oxford (Oxford Classical Texts).
Aristotle: 1965, Aristotle: On Sophistical Refutations, On Coming-to-be and Passing-away, E. S. Forster (ed.), On the Cosmos, D. J. Furley (ed.), Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, and William Heinemann, London (Loeb Classical Library).
Flew, Anthony (ed.): 1968, Logic and Language I, Basil Blackwell, Oxford. First edition 1951.
Hamblin, Charles L.: 1970, Fallacies, Methuen, London. Reprinted by Vale Press, Newport News VA, 1986.
Krabbe, Erik C. W: 1995, 'Can We Ever Pin One Down to a Formal Fallacy?', in Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, J. Anthony Blair and Charles A. Willard (eds.), Proceedings of the Third ISSA Conference on Argumentation (University of Amsterdam, June 21-24, 1994), II: Analysis and Evaluation, Sic Sat: International Centre for.the Study of Argumentation, Amsterdam, pp. 333-344. Also in: Theo A. F. Kuipers and Anne Ruth Mackor (eds.), Cognitive Patterns in Science and Common Sense: Groningen Studies in Philosophy of Science, Logic, and Epistemology, Rodopi, Amsterdam and Atlanta GA, 1995, pp. 151-164. And also in: Johan van Benthem, Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst and Frank Veltman (eds.), Logic and Argumentation, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1996, pp. 129-141.
Meinong, Alexius: 1904, 'Über Gegenstandstheorie', in Alexius Meinong et al., Untersuchungen zur Gegenstandstheorie und Psychologie, Johann Ambrosius Barth, Leipzig, pp. 20ff.
Mill, John Stuart: 1972, 'Utilitarianism', in John Stuart Mill, Utilitarianism, Liberty, Representative Government, Selections from Auauste Comte and Positivism(H. B. Acton, ed.), Dent, London, pp. 1-61. First edition 1910. 'Utilitarianism' originally appeared in parts in Fraser's Magazine, 1861.
Russell, Bertrand: 1905, 'On Denoting', Mind, n.s. 14, 479-493. Reprinted in: Bertrand Russell, Logic and Knowledge: Essays 1901-1950(R. C. Marsh, ed.), Allen & Unwin, London, and Macmillan, New York, 1956, pp. 41-56.
Ryle, Gilbert: 1931, 'Systematically Misleading Expressions', Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 32(1931-32). Reprinted in Flew (1968), pp. 11-36.
Van Eemeren, Frans H. and Rob Grootendorst: 1992, Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ, Hove, and London.
Walton, Douglas N.: 1996, Fallacies Arising from Ambiguity, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig: 1922, Tractatus logico-philosophicus, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London. Originally published in 1921 as Logisch-philosophische Abhandlung.
Woods, John and Hans V. Hansen: 1998, 'Hintikka on Aristotle's Fallacies'. To be published in Synthese.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Krabbe, E.C.W. Who is Afraid of Figure of Speech?. Argumentation 12, 281–294 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007760218196
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007760218196