Intensionality, modality, and rationality: Some presemantic considerations☆
Section snippets
John-Michael Kuczynski an assistant professor of Philosophy at Virginia Commonwealth University. He received a PhD in Philosophy in 2006 from the University of California, Santa Barbara.
References (53)
Some difficulties concerning Russellian intensional logic
Noûs
(1986)How to do Things with Words
(1953)Thought and Reference
(1987)- et al.
Semantic innocence and uncompromising situations
Spreading the Word
(1984)Sentential complementation and truth
- et al.
Insensitive Semantics: A Defense of Speech Act Pluralism and Semantic Minimalism
(2005) Rules and Representations
(1980)Language and the problems of knowledge
All the world's a stage
Australasian Journal of Philosophy
Truth and meaning
Synthese
On saying that
Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation
Frege: Philosophy of Language
On sense and nominatum
The Thought: a Logical Inquiry
Mind
The Foundations of Arithmetic
Quantifying in
Opacity
Demonstratives
Afterthoughts
A puzzle about belief
Speaker's reference and semantic reference
Naming and Necessity
On Marga Reimer's descriptions and beyond
Pragmatics and Cognition
Cited by (2)
Hope as a modus category
2016, Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University BulletinModal verbs in news-related blogs: When the blogger counts
2013, English Modality: Core, Periphery and Evidentiality
John-Michael Kuczynski an assistant professor of Philosophy at Virginia Commonwealth University. He received a PhD in Philosophy in 2006 from the University of California, Santa Barbara.
- ☆
Were it not for the guidance of three fine minds—Joseph Fulda, Andrzej Boguslawski, and Jacob Mey—this paper would have been much less than what it is. Of these already distinguished three, I owe a special debt of gratitude to Dr. Fulda, both for his many sparkling insights and also for the judiciousness and sense of proportion embodied in the manner in which he articulated them. I would also like to thank an anonymous reviewer, whose sharp comments helped me whip this paper into shape. In the next footnote, I address that reviewer's important points concerning John Searle's work.