Skip to main content
Log in

The common morality in communitarian thought: reflective consensus in public policy

  • Published:
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

I explore the possible meanings that the notion of the common morality can have in a contemporary communitarian approach to ethics and public policy. The common morality can be defined as the conditions for shared pursuit of the good or as the values, deliberations, traditions, and common construction of the narrative of a people. The former sense sees the common morality as the universal and invariant structures of morality while the second sense is much more contingent in nature. Nevertheless, the communitarian sees both aspects as integral in devising solutions to public policy problems. I outline how both meanings follow from communitarian philosophical anthropology and illustrate how they work together when addressing a question such as that of providing universal health insurance in the United States. The common morality forms the basis of building an implicit consensus that is available to and reaffirmed by the shared reflections of the citizenry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kuczewski, M.G. 2004. Communitarianism and bioethics. In Encyclopedia of bioethics, 3rd ed., ed. S.G. Post, 477–483. New York: Macmillan Reference USA.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sandel, M.J. 1982. Liberalism and the limits of justice. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rawls, John. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. London, Alex J. 2003. Threats to the common good: Biochemical weapons and human subjects research. Hastings Center Report 33: 17–25.

    Google Scholar 

  5. MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1984. After virtue: A study in moral theory. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kuczewski, Mark G. 1997. Fragmentation and consensus: Communitarian and casuist bioethics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 42 US CFR 1395dd.

  8. Daniels, Norman. 1986. Just health care. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Emanuel, Ezekiel J. 1991. The ends of human life: Medical ethics in a liberal polity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Emanuel, Ezekiel J. 2008. Healthcare, guaranteed: A simple, secure solution for America. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kuczewski, Mark G. 2001. The epistemology of communitarian bioethics: Traditions in the public debates. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 22: 135–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Moreno, Jonathan. 1995. Deciding together: Bioethics and moral consensus. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lake, C.C., R.A. Crittenden, and D. Mermin. 2008. Health care in the 2008 election: Engaging the voters. Health Affairs 27: 693–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. McDonough, J.E. 2006. Using and misusing anecdote in policy making. In Narrative matters, ed. F. Mullan, E. Ficklen, and K. Rubin, 8–13. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark G. Kuczewski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kuczewski, M.G. The common morality in communitarian thought: reflective consensus in public policy. Theor Med Bioeth 30, 45–54 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-009-9095-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-009-9095-3

Keywords

Navigation