Skip to main content
Log in

Reflections on Ethics and Game Theory

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Applications of game theory to moral philosophy are impededby foundational issues and troublesome examples. In the first part of this paper,questions are raised about the appropriate game-theoretical frameworks for applications to moralphilosophy and about the proper interpretations of the theoretical devices employed inthese frameworks. In the second part, five examples that should be of particular interest to thoseinterested in the connections between ethics and game theory are delineated and discussed. Thefirst example comprises games in which there is an outcome unanimously preferred to the``solution'' of the game, appropriately defined. The second comprises games whose solution callsfor different players to employ different strategies. The third comprises games whosesolution calls for players to adopt mixed strategies. The fourth comprises games whose solutionrequires players to cycle among a variety of strategies. The fifth comprises games whose solutionrequires players to discriminate in morally inappropriate ways.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Bendor, J. and P. Swistak: 1997, 'The Evolutionary Stability of Cooperation', American Political Science Review 91(2), 290–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendor, J. and P. Swistak: 1998, 'Evolutionary Equilibria: Characterization Theorems and Their Implications', Theory and Decision 45(2), 99–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binmore, K. G.: 1998, Game Theory and the Social Contract, Vol. 1(1994) Playing Fair, Vol. 2(1998) Just Playing, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R. and J. Lorberbaum: 1987, 'No Pure Strategy is Evolutionarily Stable in the Repeated Prisoner's Dilemma Game', Nature 327, 58–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Börgers, T. and R. Sarin: 1997, 'Learning Through Reinforcement and Replicator Dynamics', Journal of Economic Theory 77, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bush, R. and F. Mosteller, 1951, 'Stochastic Models for Learning', Psychological Review 58, 313–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, J.: 1973, 'A Stochastic Learning Model of Economic Behavior', Quarterly Journal of Economics 87, 239–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, D.: 1967, 'Morality and Advantage', Philosophical Review 76(4), 460–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gintis, H.: 2000, Game Theory Evolving, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grim, P., G. Mar, and P. St. Denis: 1998, The Philosophical Computer, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavka, G.: 1986, Hobbesian Moral and Political Theory, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knetsch, J. L.: 1989, 'The Endowment Effect and Evidence of Non-Reversible Indifference Curves', American Economic Review 79, 1277–1284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Steven and Serge Moresi: 1995, 'Pure and Utilitarian Prisoner's Dilemmas', Economics and Philosophy 11, 123–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Steven: 1996, 'Agreement Keeping and Indirect Moral Theory', Journal of Philosophy 93, 105–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knetsch, J. L. and J. A. Sinden: 1984, 'Willingness to Pay and Compensation Demanded: Experimental Evidence of an Unexpected Disparity in Measures of Value', Quarterly Journal of Economics 99, 131–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, J.: 1976, 'Ethical Relativism and the Problem of Incoherence', Ethics 86, 107–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J.: 1982, Evolution and the Theory of Games, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, M. and R.May: 1992, 'Evolutionary Games and Spatial Chaos', Nature 359, 826–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak M. A, S. Bonhoeffer, and R. May: 1994, 'Spatial Games and the Maintenance of Cooperation', Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 91, 4877–4881.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson and Zeckhauser: 1988, 'Status Quo Bias in Decision Making', Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1, 7–59.

  • Selten, R.: 1983, 'Evolutionary Stability in Extensive Two-Person Games', Mathematical Social Sciences 5, 269–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.: 1967, 'Isolation, Assurance and the Social Rate of Discount', Quarterly Journal of Economics 81(1), 112–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skyrms, B.: 2001, 'The Stag Hunt', Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 55(2), 31–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skyrms, B.: 1999, 'Reply to Critics', Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55(1), 243–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skyrms, B}.: 1996, Evolution of the Social Contract, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skyrms, B.: 1994, 'Darwin Meets “The Logic of Decision”', Philosophy of Science 61, 503–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skyrms, B. and J. Alexander: 1999, 'Bargaining with Neighbors: Is Justice Contagious?', Journal of Philosophy, 588–598.

  • Skyrms, B. and R. Pemantle: 2000, 'A Dynamic Model of Social Network Formation', Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 97(16), 9340–9346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugden, R.: 1986, The Economics of Rights Cooperation and Welfare, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taurek, J.: 1977, Philosophy and Public Affairs 2(1), 293–316.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kuhn, S.T. Reflections on Ethics and Game Theory. Synthese 141, 1–44 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SYNT.0000035846.91195.cb

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SYNT.0000035846.91195.cb

Keywords

Navigation