Abstract
In this paper we shall show that structuralist constraints applied to moral idealizations, have applications in critical ethical argumentation. Moreover, we developed some systematic concepts which may be used to evaluate the relevance and adequacy of descriptions of moral problems relative to given idealizing moral perspectives. Finally, it is shown that any two moral perspectives are comparable via the Kemeny-Snell measure of distance of rankings.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
W. Balzer, C.-H. Moulines, and J.D. Sneed,An architectonic for science, The structuralist program, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Boston-Lancaster-Tokyo.
W. Balzer and J.D. Sneed, “Generalized net structures of empirical theories I,”Studia Logica,36, 196–211.
M. Häyry,Liberal utilitarianism and applied ethics, Routledge.
J.G. Kemeny and J.L. Snell,Mathematical models in the social sciences, Blaisdell Publishing Company, Waltham, Massachusetts, Toronto, London.
M. Kuokkanen, "Structuralist constraints and mathematical social theorizing,"Erkenntnis,38, 351–370.
M. Kuokkanen, "On the structuralist constraints in social scientific theorizing,"Theory and decision,35, 19–54.
H. Westmeyer (ed.),Psychological theories from a structuralist point of view, Springer-Verlag, Berlin — Heidelberg — New York — London — Paris — Tokyo — Hong Kong.
H. Westmeyer (ed.),The structuralist program in psychology: foundations and applications, Hogrefe & Huber Publishers, Seattle — Toronto — Bern — Göttingen.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kuokkanen, M., Häyry, M. Idealization in ethics outlining a formal moral metatheory. Axiomathes 11, 21–35 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02681767
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02681767