Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Confucian Civility

  • Published:
Dao Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A major reason that Confucius should matter to Western ethical philosophers is that some of his concerns are markedly different from those most common in the West. A Western emphasis has been on major choices that are treated in a decontextualized way. Confucius’ emphasis is on paths of life, so that context matters. Further, the nuances of personal relations get more attention than is common (with the exception of feminist ethics) in Western philosophy. What Confucius provides is a valuable aid in arriving at a more balanced sense of what ethics is concerned with. It also allows us to realize the importance of sensitivity to particulars. Finally, it highlights the importance of style (as well as the content of what is chosen) in behavior, and the ways in which relations with family and friends can connect with choices in a wider “public” sphere.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, Thomas Kingsmill. 1898. “Memoir of Kant.” In Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason and Other Works On the Theory of Ethics. London: Longmans Green

  • Analects. 2003. Trans. by Edward Slingerland. Indianapolis: Hackett.

  • Baier, Annette. 1986. “The Ambiguous Limits of Desire.” In Ways of Desire, edited by Joel Mark. Chicago: Precedent.

  • Boswell, James. 1891. Life of Johnson, edited by George Birkbeck Hill. 2 vols. New York: Harper & Brothers.

  • De Bary, William Theodore. 2001. Nobility and Civility: Asian Ideals of Leadership and The Common Good. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fingarette, Herbert. 1972. Confucius—The Secular as Sacred. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, David. 1975. Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals. In Enquiries, edited by L. A. Selby-Bigge, revised by P. H. Nidditch. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Kupperman, Joel J. 2005. “Morality, Ethics, and Wisdom.” In A Handbook of Wisdom: Psychological Perspectives, edited by Robert J. Sternberg and Jennifer Jordan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Mill, John Stuart. 1978. On Liberty, edited by Elizabeth Rappaport. Indianapolis: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. 1979. Utilitarianism, ed. by George Sher. Indianapolis: Hackett.

  • Newson, Elizabeth. 1978. “Unreasonable Care: The Establishment of Selfhood.” In Human Values, edited by Geoffrey Vesey. Sussex: Harvester Press.

  • Williams, Bernard. 1975. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. London: Fontana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophical Investigations, edited by G. E. M. Anscombe. London: Macmillan

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, University of Connecticut, U-2054, Storrs, CT, 06269-2054, USA

    Joel J. Kupperman

Authors
  1. Joel J. Kupperman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joel J. Kupperman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kupperman, J.J. Confucian Civility. Dao 9, 11–23 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-009-9154-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-009-9154-5

Keyword

Search

Navigation