Skip to main content
Log in

Reflexivity, Relativism, Microhistory: Three Desiderata for Historical Epistemologies

  • Published:
Erkenntnis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper tries to motivate three desiderata for historical epistemologies: (a) that they should be reflective about the pedigree of their conceptual apparatus; (b) that they must face up to the potentially relativistic consequences of their historicism; and (c) that they must not forget the hard-won lessons of microhistory (i.e. historical events must be explained causally; historical events must not be artificially divided into internal/intellectual and external/social “factors” or “levels”; and constructed series of homogenous events must not be treated as quasi-organisms). Ian Hacking’s work on styles of reasoning and Lorraine Daston’s and Peter Galison’s investigation into epistemic virtues are used to identify the costs of neglecting these desiderata.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Cf. Crombie (1952, 1953, 1981, 1994). Relevant secondary literature includes Ariew (1995), Cohen (1994), Cunningham and Williams (1993), Iliffe (1998), Magruder (1995), Pumfrey (1997), Schuster (1990).

  2. For Duhem, see e.g. Kusch (1991, pp. 24–26).

References

  • Allen, B. (1993). Demonology, styles of reasoning, and truth. International Journal of Moral and Social Studies, 8, 95–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariew, R. (1995). Review of Crombie, styles of scientific thinking in the European tradition. Isis, 86, 82–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atran, S. (1998). Folk biology and the anthropology of science: Cognitive universals and cultural particulars. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 21, 547–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxandall, M. (1972). Painting and experience in fifteenth-century Italy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beiser, F. (2007). Historicism. In B. Leiter & M. Rosen (Eds.), Oxford handbook to continental philosophy (pp. 155–179). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J. (1972). Ways of seeing. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloor, D. (2007). Epistemic grace: Antirelativism as theology in disguise. Common Knowledge, 13, 250–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloor, D. (2008). Relativism at 30, 000 feet. In M. Mazzotti (Ed.), Knowledge as social order (pp. 13–32). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boghossian, P. (2006). Fear of knowledge: Against relativism and constructivism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1997/2006). Pascalian meditations. Cambridge: Polity. First published in French in 1997.

  • Chaunu, P. (1970). L’histoire sérielle: Bilan et perspectices. Revue historique, 494, 297–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, H. F. (1994). The scientific revolution: A historiographical inquiry. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crombie, A. (1952). Augustine to Galileo: The history of science, AD 400–1650. London: Falcon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crombie, A. (1953). Robert Grosseteste and the origins of experimental science, 1100–1700. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crombie, A. C. (1981). Philosophical perspectives and shifting interpretations of Galileo. In J. Hintikka, D. Grunder, & E. Agazzi (Eds.), Theory change, ancient axiomatics and Galileo’s methodology (pp. 271–286). Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crombie, A. C. (1994). Styles of scientific thinking in the European tradition (Vol. 3). London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, A., & Williams, P. (1993). De-centring the ‘big picture’: The origins of modern science and the modern origins of science. British Journal for the History of Science, 26, 407–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daston, L. (1994). Historical epistemology. In J. Chandler, A. Davidson, & H. D. Harootunian (Eds.), Questions of evidence: Proof, practice, and persuasion across the disciplines (pp. 282–289). Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daston, L., & Galison, P. (2007). Objectivity. New York: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink, E. (1957). Operative Begriffe in Husserls Phänomenologie. Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, 2, 321–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, R. (1997). Alistair Cameron Crombie, 4 November 1915–1919 February 1996. Isis, 88, 183–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furet, F. (1985). Quantitative methods in history. In J. Le Goff & P. Nora (Eds.), Constructing the past: Essays in historical methodology (pp. 12–27). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginzburg, C. (1998). Style as inclusion, style as exclusion. In C. A. Jones & P. Galison (Eds.), Picturing science, producing art (pp. 27–53). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I. (1982/2002). Language, truth, and reason. In I. Hacking (Ed.), Historical ontology (pp. 159–177). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. First published in 1982.

  • Hacking, I. (1992a). Statistical language, statistical truth and statistical reason: The self-authentication of a style of scientific reasoning. In E. McMullin (Ed.), The social dimension of science (pp. 130–157). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I. (1992b/2002). ‘Style’ for historians and philosophers. In I. Hacking (Ed.), Historical ontology (pp. 178–199). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. First published in 1992.

  • Hacking, I. (1992c). The Self-vindication of the laboratory sciences. In A. Pickering (Ed.), Science as practice and culture (pp. 29–64). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I. (1996). The disunity of the sciences. In P. Galison & D. J. Stump (Eds.), The disunity of science: Boundaries, contexts, and power (pp. 37–74). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I. (1999). Historical meta-epistemology. In W. Carl, & L. Daston (Eds.), Wahrheit und Geschichte (pp. 53–77). Abhandlungen der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Göttingen. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

  • Hacking, I. (2002). Inaugural lecture: Chair of philosophy and history of scientific concepts at the Collège de France, 16 January 2001. Economy and Society, 31, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I. (2002/2003). Résumé des cours. Retrieved August 9, 2007, from http://www.college-de-france.fr/media/ins_pro/UPL35835_ihackingres0203.pdf.

  • Hacking, I. (2005/2006). Raison et véracité: les choses, les gens, la raison. Retrieved August 9, 2007, from http://www.college-de-france.fr/default/EN/all/ins_pro/p1157460409944.htm.

  • Hacking, I. (2007). Finding out: Prolegomena to a theory of truthfulness and reasoning in the sciences. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Iliffe, R. (1998). Rational artistry. Review of Crombie, styles of scientific thinking in the European tradition. History of Science, 36, 329–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusch, M. (1991). Foucault’s strata and fields: A study in archaeological and genealogical science studies. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1981). After virtue: A study in moral theory. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magruder, K. (1995). Review of Crombie, styles of scientific thinking in the European tradition. Sixteenth Century Journal, 26, 406–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. (2004). Crombie, Alistair Cameron (19151996). Oxford dictionary of national biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved August 7, 2007 from http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/62017.

  • Pumfrey, S. (1997). The scientific revolution. In M. Bentley (Ed.), Companion to historiography (pp. 293–306). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, J. A. (1990). The scientific revolution. In R. C. Olby, G. N. Cantor, J. R. R. Christie, & M. J. S. Hodge (Eds.), Companion to the history of modern science (pp. 217–242). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, S., & Schaffer, S. (1985). Leviathan and the air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the experimental life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. (1981). The truth in relativism. In B. Williams (Ed.), Moral luck (pp. 133–143). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. (1985). Ethics and the limits of philosophy. London: Fontana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. (2002). Truth and truthfulness. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zagzebski, L. (1996). Virtues of the mind: An inquiry into the nature of virtue and the ethical foundations of knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I am indebted to Uljana Feest and Thomas Sturm for organising the conference that provided me with the challenge to write this paper. For comments, questions and suggestions I am grateful to Raine Daston, Sarah Gore-Cortes, Ian Hacking, Jeff Kochan, Simon Schaffer, Catherine Wilson, and two anonymous referees.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Kusch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kusch, M. Reflexivity, Relativism, Microhistory: Three Desiderata for Historical Epistemologies. Erkenn 75, 483–494 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-011-9336-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-011-9336-5

Keywords

Navigation