Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Is science compatible with religion but not with naturalism?

Alvin Plantinga: Where the conflict really lies: Science, religion, and naturalism. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011, xvi+359pp, $27.95 HB

  • Book Review
  • Published:
Metascience Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Dennett, D.C., and A. Plantinga. 2011. Science and religion: Are they compatible?. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacey, H. 2009. The interplay of scientific activity, worldviews and value outlooks. Science & Education 18: 839–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, S.D. 2009. Unsimple truths: Science, complexity and policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T. 2012. Mind & Cosmos: Why the materialist neo-Darwinian conception of nature is almost certainly false. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, Swarthmore College, 500 College Ave, Swarthmore, PA, 19081, USA

    Hugh Lacey

  2. Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

    Hugh Lacey

Authors
  1. Hugh Lacey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hugh Lacey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lacey, H. Is science compatible with religion but not with naturalism?. Metascience 22, 423–426 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-013-9763-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-013-9763-9

Search

Navigation