Abstract
In social and political philosophy, linguistic differences are usually seen as one item in the long and indefinite list of Cultural Differences; consequently, language rights are discussed and criticized together with other cultural rights. In this essay, it is argued that a right to use one's own language can be justified by appeal to the practical role of language in human life. The ability to communicate effectively is essential for human autonomy and well-being; thus there is no need to argue that linguistic groups, as groups, are entitled to special treatment, or that language rights are ‘group rights’. Because learning a new language is invariably a costly matter, by recognizing some languages as official languages the state (re)distributes burdens and benefits among its citizens. The task of language rights is to guarantee that these burdens are not distributed in a too unequal way.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Bradley, F.H., “My Station and Its Duties” in Ethical Studies. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1876/1951, pp. 195–220.
Denitch, B.D., “National Identity, Politics, and Democracy,” Social Science Information, 35 (1996), pp. 459–483.
Edwards, J., “Introduction” in J. Edwards (ed.), Linguistic Minorities, Policies, and Pluralism. London: Academic Press, 1984.
Graff, J.A., “Human Rights, Peoples, and the Right to Self-Determination” in J. Baker (ed.), Group Rights. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1994, pp. 186–214.
Hartney, M., “Some Confusions Concerning Collective Rights” in W. Kymlicka (ed.), The Rights of Minority Cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996, pp. 202–227.
Kymlicka, W., Liberalism, Community and Culture. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.
Kymlicka, W., “Individual and Community Rights” in J. Baker (ed.), Group Rights. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1994, pp. 17–33.
Lagerspetz, E., The Opposite Mirrors. An Essay on the Conventionalist Theory of Institutions. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1995.
Nimni, E., “Marx, Engels, and the National Question” in W. Kymlicka (ed.), The Rights of Minority Cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996, pp. 57–75.
Réaume, D.G., “The Group Right to Linguistic Security: Whose Right, What Duties?” in J. Baker (ed.), Group Rights. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1994, pp. 118–141.
Réaume, D.G., “The Intrinsic Value of Language: Justifying the Right to Comprehensive Official Language Use in the Courts”, forthcoming, 1997.
Spinner, J., The Boundaries of Citizenship. Race, Ethnicity and Nationality in a Liberal State. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press, 1994.
Taylor, C., Philosophical Arguments. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1995.
Waldron J., “Minority Cultures and the Cosmopolitan Alternative” in W. Kymlicka (ed.), The Rights of Minority Cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996, pp. 93–119.
Walzer, M., “Pluralism: A Political Perspective” in W. Kymlicka (ed.), The Rights of Minority Cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996, pp. 139–154.
Watson, M., “Conclusion: The 1970s, 1980s and Beyond” in M. Watson (ed.), Contemporary Minority Nationalism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1990, pp. 195–220.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lagerspetz, E. On Language Rights. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 1, 181–199 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009990824715
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009990824715