Skip to main content
Log in

The normativity of naturalistic epistemology

  • Published:
Philosophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Armstrong, D.M. (1973).Belief Truth and Knowledge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, S. (1993). ‘Circles, Finks, Smells and Biconditionals’,Philosophical Perspectives, 7, Language and Logic, ed. by J.E. Tomberlin, (Atascadero: Ridgeview Publishing Company).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brower, W.B. (1993). ‘Dispositional Ethical Realism’,Ethics 103, pp. 221–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, E. (1987). ‘The Practical Explication of Knowledge’Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 87 (1986–87), pp. 211–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, E. (1990).Knowledge and the State of Nature (Oxford: Clarendon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dretske, F.I. (1981).Knowledge and the Flow of Information (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, R. (1993).Working Without a Net: A Study of Egocentric Epistemology (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, A.H. (1988).Empirical Knowledge (Berkeley: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, A.I. (1967). ‘A Causal Theory of Knowing’,The Journal of Philosophy, 64, pp. 355–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, A.I. (1979). ‘What Is Justified Belief?’, in G.S. Pappas (ed.),Justification and Knowledge (Dordrecht: D. Reidel).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, A.I. (1986).Epistemology and Cognition (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, A.I. (1991). ‘Stephen P. Stich:The Fragmentation of Reason’,Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51, pp. 189–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, Alvin I., 1992, ‘Epistemic Folkways and Scientific Epistemology’, inLiaisons: Philosophy Meets the Cognitive and Social Sciences, The MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hookway, C. (1990).Scepticism (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, M., (1989). ‘Dispositional Theories of Value’,The Aristotelian Society:Supplementary Volume 63, pp. 139–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. (1988). ‘What Is “Naturalized Epistemology”?’, in J.E. Tomberlin (ed.),Philosophical Perspectives, 2: Epistemology 1988 (Atascanero: Ridgeview Publishing Company).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornblith, H. (1993). ‘Epistemic Normativity’,Synthese 94, pp. 357–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, L. (1987). ‘Progress or Rationality? The Prospects for Normative Naturalism’,American Philosophical Quarterly 24, pp. 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (1989). ‘Dispositional Theories of Value’,The Aristotelian Society:Supplementary Volume63, pp. 113–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lycan, W.G. (1988).Judgement and Justification (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, J.L. (1977).Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maffie, J. (1990a). ‘Recent Work on Naturalized Epistemology’,American Philosophical Quarterly 27, pp. 281–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maffie, J. (1990b). ‘Naturalism and the Normativity of Epistemology’,Philosophical Studies 59, pp. 333–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser, P.K. (1989).Knowledge and Evidence (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R. (1981).Philosophical Explanations (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Papineau, D. (1992). ‘Reliabilism, Induction and Scepticism’,The Philosophical Quarterly 42, pp. 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papineau, D. (1993).Philosophical Naturalism (Blackwell: Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. (1991). ‘Realism and Response-Dependence’,Mind 100, pp. 587–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. (1993).The Common Mind: An Essay on Psychology, Society, and Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W.V. (1969). ‘Epistemology Naturalized’, inOntological Relativity and Other Essays (New York: Columbia University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W.V. (1984). ‘Relativism and Absolutism’,The Monist 67, pp. 293–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W.V. (1986). ‘Reply to White’, in L. Hahn and P.A. Schilpp (eds.),The Philosophy of W.V. Quine (La Salle: Open Court).

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W.V. (1987).Quiddities: An Intermittently Philosophical Dictionary (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W.V. (1990a).Pursuit of Truth (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W.V. (1990b). ‘Comment on Davidson’, in R. Barrett and R. Gibson (eds.),Perspectives on Quine (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. (1989). ‘Dispositional Theories of Value’,The Aristotelian Society:Supplementary Volume63, pp. 89–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosa, E. (1991).Knowledge in Perspective: Selected Essays in Epistemology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Swain, M. (1981).Reasons and Knowledge (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • von Wright, G.H. (1963).Norm and Action: A Logical Enquiry (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, C. (1992).Truth and Objectivity (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lammenranta, M. The normativity of naturalistic epistemology. Philosophia 26, 337–358 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02381496

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02381496

Keywords

Navigation