Skip to main content
Log in

Embedded choices

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, we present a contextually embedded choice theory. Using concepts and tools of poset mathematics, we show how to include in rational choice theory cultural and social effects. Specifically, we define some choice superstructures, seen as choice set transformations imposed by cultural and social norms. As we shall argue, these transformations can be of help to explain choice behavior within different contexts. Moreover, we show that, once choice superstructures are taken into account, some well-known results about maximizing and optimizing behavior are easily confirmed and some insights on intransitive choices may be phased out.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anand P. (1987) Are the preferences really rational?. Theory and Decision 23(3): 189–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anand P. (1993) The philosophy of intransitive preferences. Economic Journal 103(4): 337–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baharad E., Nitzan S. (2000) Extended preferences and freedom of choice. Social Choice and Welfare 17(2): 629–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaton A. F., Candeal J. C., Herden G., Indurain E., Mehta G. B. (2002) The nonexistence of a utility function and the structure of non-representable preference relations. Journal of Mathematical Economics 37(1): 17–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beiley J. W. (1998) Is it rationale to maximize?. Utilitas 10(2): 195–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger J., Ridgeway C. L., Zelditch M. (2002) Construction of status and referential structures. Sociological Theory 20(2): 157–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billot A. (2003) The deep side of preference theory. Theory and Decision 53: 243–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridges D. S., Metha G. B. (1995) Representation of preference orderings. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Broome J. (1994) Extended preferences. Oxford Economic Papers 56(2): 18–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Broome J. (2000) Incommensurable values. In: Crisp R., Hooker B. (eds) Essays in honour of James Griffin. Well-being and morality, Oxford, pp 21–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Candeal J. C., Herves C., Indurain E. (1998) Some results on representation and extension of preferences. Journal of Mathematical Economics 29(1): 75–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman J. S. (1990) Foundations of social theory. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Davey B. A., Priestley H. A. (1990) Introduction to lattices and order. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilthey W. (1900) The development of hermeneutics. In: Rickman H. P. (eds) W. Dilthey: Selected writings. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrgott M. (1998) Discrete decision problems, multiple criteria optimization classes and lexicographic max-ordering. In: Stewart T. J., Honert R. C. (eds) Trends in multicriteria decision making. Springer, Berlin, pp 31–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster J. (1996) Rationality and the emotions. Economic Journal 106: 1386–1397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etioni A. (1985) Opening the preferences: A socioeconomic research agenda. Journal of behavioral Economics 11(2): 183–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folbre N. (1994) Who pays for the kids? Gender and the structures of constraint. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert M. (2001) Collective preferences, obligations and rational choice. Economics and Philosophy 17: 109–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter M. (1985) Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 91(3): 481–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter M. (2005) The impact of social structure on economic outcomes. Journal of Economic Perspectives 19(1): 33–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin J. (1997) Well-being: Its meaning, measurement and moral importance. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi J. C. (1977) Rational behavior and bargaining equilibrium in games and social situations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Herzberger H. G. (1973) Ordinal preferences and rational choice. Econometrica 41: 187–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson M. R., Dean R. A. (2001) Locally complete path independent choice functions and their lattices. Mathematical Social Science 42: 53–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D., Tversky A. (1984) Choices, values and frames. American Psychologist 39(1): 341–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalai G., Rubinstein A., Spiegler R. (2002) Rationalizing choice functions by multiple rationales. Econometrica 70(6): 2481–2488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katzner D. W. (2000) Culture and the explanation of choice behavior. Theory and Decision 48: 241–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koppl R., Whitman D. G. (2004) Rational-choice hermeneutics. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 55: 295–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis D. (1986) Counterfactuals. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukes S. (1970) Some problems about rationality. In: Wilson B. R. (eds) Rationality. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukes S. (2000) Different cultures, different rationalities?. History of the Human Sciences 13(1): 3–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mas-Colell A., Whinston M. D., Green J. R. (1995) Microeconomic theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullainathan S. (2002) A memory-based model of bounded rationality. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 107(3): 735–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nehring K. (2000) A theory of rational choice under ignorance. Theory and Decision 48(3): 205–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podinovski V.V., Podinovski V.V. (1998) Decision analysis under partial information. In: Stewart T.J., Van den Honert R.C. (eds) Trends in multicriteria decision making. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Quesada A. (2002) A conflict between sequential rationality and consistency principles. International Journal of Game Theory 31(1): 13–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quizilbash M. (2002) Rationality, comparability and maximization. Economics and Philosophy 18: 141–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray I., Zhou L. (2001) Game theory and revealed preferences. Games and Economic Behavior 37: 415–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rival, I. (eds) (1982) Posets, NATO ASI series 83. Reidel, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein A. (1998) Modeling bounded rationality. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A. K. (1971) Choice functions and revealed preferences. Review of Economic Studies 38(3): 307–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen A. K. (1985) Rationality and uncertainty. Theory and Decision 18: 109–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen A. K. (1986) Information and invariance in normative choice. In: Heller W. P., Starr R., Starrett D. A. (eds) Social choice and public decision making: Essays in honor of Kenneth J. Arrow (Vol. 1). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A. K. (1994a) Internal consistency of choice. Econometrica 61(3): 495–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen A. K. (1994b) Non-binary choice and preference. In: Prawitz D., Skyrms B., Westerstahl D. (eds) Logic, methodology and philosophy of science. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A. K. (1997) Maximization and the act of choice. Econometrica 65(4): 745–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen A. K. (1999) Reason before identity. Oxford University Press, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A. K. (2002) Rationality and freedom. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon H. A. (1955) A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics 69: 99–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon H. A. (1972) Theories of bounded rationality. In: McGuire C. B., Radner R. (eds) Decision and Organization. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 161–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon H. A. (1982) Models of bounded rationality. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon H. A. (2000) Barriers and bounds to rationality. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 11(3): 243–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugden R. (2000) Team preferences. Economics and Philosophy 20: 175–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suzumura K. (1976) Rational choice and revealed preferences. Review of Economic Studies 43(2): 149–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzumura K. (1983) Rational choice, collective decisions and social welfare. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor C. (1985) Philosophy and the human science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diego Lanzi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lanzi, D. Embedded choices. Theory Decis 68, 263–280 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-009-9178-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-009-9178-7

Keywords

Navigation