Abstract
A growing literature addresses the ethical implications of electronic surveillance at work, frequently assigning ethical priority to values such as the ‘right to privacy’. This paper suggests that, in practice, the issues are sociologically more complex than some accounts suggest. This is because many workplace electronic technologies not designed or deployed for surveillance purposes nevertheless embody surveillance capacity. This capacity may not be immediately obvious to participants or lend itself to simple deployment. Moreover, because of their primary functions, such systems embody a range of other features which are potentially beneficial for those utilising them. As a result, more complex ethical dilemmas emerge as different desired ‘goods’ compete for priority in the decision-making of individuals and groups. From a sociological point of view this raises interesting questions about the way ethical dilemmas arise in the context of the ongoing social relationships of work. The paper explores these issues using data from a study of the development and implementation of a computerised instructional package in a maternity setting. This medical setting illustrates clearly how seeking to assign ethical priority to a particular concern, such as the ‘right to privacy’, cannot but oversimplify the real day to day dilemmas encountered by participants. At the same time, the example of the instructional package demonstrates that it is difficult to predict in advance what ethical issues will be raised by technologies that almost always turn out to have a range of capabilities beyond those envisaged in their original design specification.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
P. Bain and P. Taylor. Entrapped by the “Electronic Panopticon”? Worker Resistance in the Call Centre. New Technology, Work and Employment, 15 (1): 2–18, 2000.
P. Barach and S.D. Small. Reporting and Preventing Medical Mishap: Lessons from Non-Medical Near Miss Reporting. British Medical Journal, 320 (7237): 759–763, 2000.
J.F.R. Barrett, G.J. Jarvis, H.N. MacDonald, P.C. Buchan, S.N. Tyrell and R.J. Lilford. Inconsistencies in Clinical Decisions in Obstetrics. Lancet, 336: 549–551, 1990.
Ulrich Beck. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage Publications, 1992.
Confidential Enquiry into Stillbirths and Deaths in Infancy (CESDI). 4th Annual Report (1997) Concentrating on intrapartum related deaths 1994–95. Maternal and Child Health Research Consortium, Chiltern Court, Baker Street, London. NW1 5SD.
F.T. De Dombal, V. Dallos and W.A.F. McAdam. Can Computer Aided Teaching Packages Improve Clinical Care In Patients With Acute Abdominal Pain?', British Medical Journal, 302: 1495–1497, 1991.
M. Ennis and C.A. Vincent. Obstetric Accidents: A Review of 64 Cases. British Medical Journal, 300: 1365–1367, 1990.
S. Fernie and D. Metcalf. (Not) Hanging on the Telephone: Payment Systems in the New Sweat Shops. London: Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics, 1998.
M. Ford. Surveillance and Privacy at Work. London: The Institute of Employment Rights, 1998.
M. Foucault. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1979.
C. Hampele and E. Hines. A Low-Cost Computer-Assisted Teaching Package for Kidney Dialysis: A Preliminary Report. Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology, 14 (4): 158–161, 1990.
S.W.F. Holloway, N.D. Jewson and D.J. Mason. “Reprofessionalization” or “Occupational Imperialism”? Some Reflections on Pharmacy in Britain. Social Science and Medicine, 23 (2): 323–332, 1986.
L.D. Introna. Workplace Surveillance, Privacy and Distributive Justice. Computers and Society, 30 (4): 33–39, 2000.
T.J. Johnson. Professions and Power. London: Macmillan, 1972.
R. Kling. Value Conflicts in Computing Developments' Telecommunications Policy, March 1983. In T. Forester, editor, Computers in the Human Context. London: Basil Blackwell, 1983.
G. Lankshear, D. Mason, G. Button and S. Coates. Surveillancecapable Technology at Work: A Privacy Issue. Paper presented at the 17th Annual International Labour Process Conference, 29–31 March1999, School of Management, Royal Holloway, University of London, 1998.
G. Lankshear, P. Cook, D. Mason, G. Button and S. Coates. Call Centre Employees' Responses to Electronic Monitoring: Some Research Findings. Work Employment and Society, 15 (3): 2001.
G. Larkin. Occupational Monopoly and Modern Medicine. London: Tavistock, 1983.
P.Y. Leberge, P. Marton and J. Racicot. Interactive Multimedia Computer Program on Ectopic Pregnancy and First Trimester Bleeding. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 17 (3): 187–191, 1997.
M.A. Leigh. The Lawyer' View of Fetal Monitoring. Proc. Department of Health conference on fetal monitoring. Cumberland Lodge, Windsor. 28–29 January, 1993, pp. 33–40.
D. Lyon and E. Zureik (eds.). Computers, Surveillance and Privacy. Mineapolis/London: University of Minesota, 1996.
G.T. Marx. An Ethics for the New Surveillance. The Information Society, 14 (3): http://web.mit.edu/gtmarx/www/ncolin5.html, 1998.
G.T. Marx and S. Sherizan. Monitoring on the Job. In T. Forrester, editor, Computers in the Human Context. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1991.
J.H. Moor. Towards a Theory of Privacy in the Information Age. Computers and Society, Sept. 1997: 27–32, 1997.
D.G. Morris. Using Telemedicine to Facilitate Training in Cardiotocography (CTG) Interpretation Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 6(Supplement 1), 2000.
K. Mulholland. Back to the Future: A Call Centre and New Forms of Direct Control. Paper presented at the 17th International Labour Process Conference, School of Management, Royal Holloway, University of London, 29–31 March 1999.
E.J. Ottensmeyer and McCarthy. Ethics in the Workplace. New York: McGraw Hill, 1996.
Perri 6. The future of Privacy. Volume 1, Private Life and Public Policy. London: Demos, 1998.
S. Rogerson and T.W. Bynum. Cyberspace: the Ethical Frontier. The Times Higher Education Supplement, June 9: iv, 1995.
J.B. Rule. High-Tech Workplace Surveillance: What' Really New? In D. Lyon and E. Zureik, editors, Computers, Surveillance and Privacy. Minneapolis/London: University of Minnesota Press, 1996.
G. Sewell and B. Wilkinson. Someone to Watch over Me: Surveillance, Discipline and the Just-In-Time Labour Process. Sociology, 26 (2): 279–282, 1992.
R.A. Spinello. Ethical Aspects of Information Technology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1995.
A. Westin. Two Key Factors that Belong in a Macroergonomic Analysis of Electronic Monitoring: Employee Perceptions of Fairness and the Climate of Organisational Trust or Distrust. Applied Ergonomics, 23/1: 35–42, 1992.
T. Wilson and G. Mires. ‘Teacher Versus the Computer for Instruction: A Study’, British Journal of Midwifery, (6) 10: 655–658, 1998.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lankshear, G., Mason, D. Technology and ethical dilemmas in a medical setting: Privacy, professional autonomy, life and death. Ethics and Information Technology 3, 223–233 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012248219018
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012248219018