Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Consumer Rights: An Assessment of Justice

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For the last 50 years the idea of consumer rights has formed an essential element in the formulation of policy to guide the workings of the marketplace. The extent and coverage of these rights has evolved and changed over time, yet there has been no comprehensive analysis as to the purpose and scope of consumer rights. In moral and ethical philosophy, rights are integrally linked to the notion of justice. By reassessing consumer rights through a justice-based framework, a number of key issues emerge regarding the way in which markets enable justice for consumers. The consumer rights which underpin the United Nations consumer protection guidelines address all forms of justice to some degree, but the predominant focus is on procedural justice. Our conclusions question whether this is sufficient and also whether there is a case to develop the notion of consumer ‘duties’ that complement the idea of rights.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adkins, N., & Ozanne, J. L. (2005a). Critical consumer education: Empowering the low-literate consumer. Journal of Macromarketing, 25(2), 153–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adkins, N., & Ozanne, J. L. (2005b). The low-literate consumer. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(1), 93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ariely, D. (2008). Predictably irrational: The hidden forces that shape our decisions. London: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, S. M., Gentry, J. W., & Rittenburg, T. L. (2005). Building understanding of the domain of consumer vulnerability. Journal of Macromarketing, 25(2), 128–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballantyne, D., & Varey, R. (2006). Creating value-in-use through marketing interaction: The exchange logic relating to communicating and knowing. Marketing Theory, 6(3), 335–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, B. (2005). Why social justice matters (themes for the 21st century series). London: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beji-Becheur, A., Pedregal, V. D., & Ozcaglar-Toulouse, N. (2008). Fair trade—Just how “fair” are the exchanges? Journal of Macromarketing, 28(5), 44–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria for fairness. In R. Lewicki, B. Sheppard, & M. Bazerman (Eds.), Research negotiation in organisations (pp. 43–55). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blodgett, J. G., Hill, D. J., & Tax, S. S. (1997). The effects of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice on postcomplaint behaviour. Journal of Retailing, 73(2), 185–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M., Goodman, A., & Leicester, A. (2006). Household spending in Britain. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkmann, J. (2004). Looking at consumer behaviour in a moral perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 51(2), 129–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, R. (1962). Silent spring. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caudill, E. M., & Murphy, P. E. (2000). Consumer online privacy: Legal and ethical issues. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 19(1), 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatzidakis, A., Hibbert, S., & Smith, A. (2007). Why people don’t take concerns about fair trade to the supermarket: The role of neutralisation. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(1), 89–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J. A., Greenberg, J., & Zapata-Phelan, C. P. (2005). What is organizational justice? A historical overview. In T. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), The handbook of organizational justice (pp. 3–56). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Consumer Focus. (2009). Energy customers overcharged more than £1.6B. http://www.consumerfocus.org.

  • Consumers International. (2009). How are consumer rights defined? World consumer day: history and purpose. http://www.consumersinternational.org.

  • Crain, W. M., & Tollison, R. D. (2002). Consumer choice and the popular music industry: A test of the superstar theory. Empirica, 29, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culnan, M. J., & Armstrong, P. K. (1999). Information privacy concerns, procedural fairness, and impersonal trust: An empirical investigation. Organization Science, 10(1), 104–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culnan, M. J., & Bies, R. J. (2003). Consumer privacy: Balancing economic and justice considerations. Journal of Social Issues, 59(2), 323–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Rosario, D., & Williams, J. D. (2005). Retail redlining: Definition, theory, typology and measurement. Journal of Macromarketing, 25(2), 175–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, A., & Elliott, R. (2006). The evolution of the empowered consumer. European Journal of Marketing, 40(9/10), 1106–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denegri-Knott, J., Zwick, D., & Schroeder, J. (2006). Mapping consumer power: An integrative framework for marketing and consumer research. European Journal of Marketing, 40(9/10), 950–971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dholakia, N. (2011). Rise of mystification and delusive consciousness as major contemporary marketing successes. Academy of Marketing Conference, July, Liverpool.

  • Fukukawa, K., Ennew, C., & Diacon, S. (2007). An eye for an eye: Investigating the impact of consumer perception of corporate unfairness on aberrant consumer behaviour. Research in Ethical Issues in Organisations, 7, 187–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. (1991). Privacy: Recognition of a consumer right. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 10(1), 149–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1987). A taxonomy of organization justice themes. Academy of Management Review, 12(1), 9–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1993). The social side of fairness: Interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice. In R. Cropanzario (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management (pp. 70–103). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harland, D. (1987). The United Nations guidelines for consumer protection. Journal of Consumer Policy, 10, 245–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilton, M. (2009). Prosperity for all: Consumer activism in an era of globalisation. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. (1651). Leviathan. http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/phl302/texts/hobbes/leviathan-contents.html.

  • Hoffman, M., Lawson, R., & Stephenson, J. (2009). Is there a ‘silent majority’? Comparing opinions and motivations of wind farm submitters and non-submitters. Report for the National Energy Research Institute. Dunedin: University of Otago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook, M., & Hirschman, E. (1982). The experiential aspects of consumption: Consumer fantasies, feelings and fun. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(September), 132–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Organisation of Consumer Unions. (1986). Consumer policy 2000: Seminar report. The Hague: IOCU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kambewa, E., Ingenbleek, P., & van Tilburg, A. (2008). Improving income positions of primary producers in international marketing channels: The Lake Victoria—EU Nile Perch Case. Journal of Macromarketing, 28(5), 53–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, E. (1785/1996). The metaphysics of morals. Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  • Kerrigan, F., & Schaefer, A. (2007). Equality and diversity in marketing. Equal Opportunities International, 26(7), 631–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitzes, J., Wackernagel, M., Loh, J., Peller, A., Goldfinger, S., Cheng, D., et al. (2008). Shrink and share: Humanity’s present and future ecological footprint. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 363, 467–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozinets, R., & Handelman, J. (2004). Adversaries of consumption: Consumer movements, activism, ideology. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(3), 691–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, A. B. (2005). The economics of real superstars: The market for rock concerts in the material world. Journal of Labor Economics, 23(1), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laczniak, G. R., & Kennedy, A. -M. (2011). Hyper norms: Searching for a global code of conduct. Journal of Macromarketing, 31(3), 245–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laczniak, G. R., & Murphy, P. E. (2008). Distributive justice: Pressing questions, emerging directions, and the promise of Rawlsian analysis. Journal of Macromarketing, 28(5), 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, J., & Favor, C. (2007). Distributive Justice. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Fall Edition. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/justice-distributive/.

  • Larsen, G. (1998). Rural New Zealand: An appraisal of consumer policy requirements. Unpublished MCom Dissertation, University of Otago, Dunedin.

  • Larsen, G., Lawson, R., & Fischer, W. (2001). Assessing Consumers’ Perceptions of Consumer Rights. Annual Conference of the European Academy of Marketing, Bergen, May 2001.

  • Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in Theory and Research (pp. 27–55). New York: Plenum Press.

  • Levy, S. (1959). Symbols for Sale. Harvard Business Review, 37 (July/August), 117–124.

  • London, T., & Hart, S. L. (2004). Reinventing strategies for emerging markets: Beyond the transnational model. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(5), 350–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan, S. (2006). Concentration ratios for business by industry in 2004. Economic Trends, 635, Office for National Statistics, October, pp 25–47.

  • Mascarenhas, D. A., Kesavan, R., & Bernacchi, M. (2008). Buyer-seller information asymmetry: Challenges to distributive and corrective justice. Journal of Macromarketing, 28(1), 68–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLean, A. (1995). ’Empowerment and the psychiatric consumer/ex-patient movement in the United States: Contradictions. Crisis and Change’ Social Science and Medicine, 40(8), 1053–1071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Consumer Affairs. (2003). Literature review on analytical frameworks: Background paper to ‘Creating Confident Consumers’. http://www.consumeraffairs.govt.nz/.

  • Moran, D. D., Wackernagel, M., Kitzes, J. A., Goldfinger, S., & Boutaud, A. (2008). Measuring sustainable development—Nation by nation. Ecological Economics, 64(3), 470–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murtagh, K. (2005). ‘Punishment’ internet encyclopaedia of philosophy. http://www.iep.utm.edu/punishme/.

  • Norberg, P. A., Horne, D. R., & Horne, D. A. (2007). The privacy paradox: Personal information disclosure intentions versus behaviours. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 41(1), 100–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Packard, V. (1957). The hidden persuaders. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, J., Nowak, G., & Ferrell, E. (2000). Privacy concerns and consumer willingness to provide personal information. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 19(1), 27–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K. (2005). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid: Eradicating poverty through profits. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Hammond, A. (2002). Serving the world’s poor. Harvard Business Review, 80(9), 48–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1993). Political liberalism. The John Dewey essays in philosophy, 4. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, H. (2005). John Rawls (1921–2002). Internet encyclopaedia of philosophy. http://www.iep.utm.edu/rawls/.

  • Ringold, D. (2005). Vulnerability in the marketplace: Concepts, caveats and possible solutions. Journal of Macromarketing, 25(2), 202–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. S., Chamberlain, J., Ellison, M. L., & Crean, T. (1997). A consumer constructed scale to measure empowerment among users of mental health services. Psychiatric Services, 48(8), 1042–1047.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salzer, M. (2005). Consumer empowerment in mental health organizations: Concept, benefits, and impediments. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 24(5), 425–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, N. J. C., & Laczniak, G. R. (2009). Marketing to the poor: An integrative justice model for engaging impoverished market segments. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 28(1), 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, B. (2000). Self-determination—the tyranny of freedom. American Psychologist, 55(1), 79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, B., Ward, A., Monterosso, J., Lyubomirsky, S., White, K., & Lehman, D. (2002). Maximizing versus satisficing: happiness is a matter of choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(5), 1178–1197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, D., Newholm, T., & Dickinson, R. (2006). Consumption as voting: An exploration of consumer empowerment. European Journal of Marketing, 40(9/10), 1049–1067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheehan, K., & Hoy, M. (2000). Dimensions of privacy concern among online consumers. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 19(1), 62–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slote, M. (2010). Justice as virtue. The stanford encyclopaedia of philosophy, fall edition. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/justice-virtue/.

  • Smith, W. R. (1956). Product differentiation and market segmentation as alternative marketing strategies. Journal of Marketing, 21(1), 3–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. C. (1995). Marketing strategies for the ethics era. Sloan Management Review, 36(Summer), 85–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. Thomas Aquinas. 1265–1274/1947, Summa Theologica. Translated by The Fathers of the English Dominican Province. http://www.sacred-texts.com/chr/aquinas/summa/sum317.htm.

  • Suffolk University Centre for Restorative Justice. (2010). What is restorative justice? http://www.suffolk.edu/research/6953.html.

  • Ten, C. L. (1987). Crime, guilt and punishment. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2003). United Nations guidelines for consumer protection (as expanded in 1999). Department of Economic and Social Affairs. New York: United Nations.

  • United Nations. (2011). Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression. Human Rights Council. New York: United Nations.

  • Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68((Jan)), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S. J. (2003). Consumer ethics research: Review, synthesis and suggestions for future research. Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 33–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weidenbaum, M. (1987). The case against the UN guidelines for consumer protection. Journal of Consumer Policy, 10(4), 425–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wertheimer, E. (1994). Punitive damages and strict products liability: An essay in oxymoron. Villanova Law Review, 39, 505–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. W., Gaines, J., & Hill, R. P. (2008). Neuromarketing and consumer free will. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 42(3), 389–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gretchen Larsen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Larsen, G., Lawson, R. Consumer Rights: An Assessment of Justice. J Bus Ethics 112, 515–528 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1275-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1275-9

Keywords

Navigation