Abstract
In this paper we discuss the meaning of Owen's coalitional extension of the Banzhaf index in the context of voting situations. It is discussed the possibility of accommodating this index within the following model: in order to evaluate the likelihood of a voter to be crucial in making a decision by means of a voting rule a second input (apart from the rule itself) is necessary: an estimate of the probability of different vote configurations. It is shown how Owen's coalitional extension can be seen as three different normative variations of this model.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Aumann, R. J. and Drèze, J. (1975), Solutions of cooperative games with coalitional structure, International Journal of Game Theory 4, 167–176.
Banzhaf, J. (1965), Weighted voting doesn' t work:a mathematical analysis, Rutgers Law Review 19, 317–343.
Dubey, P. and Shapley, L. S. (1979), Mathematical properties of the Banzhaf power index, Mathematics of Operations Research 4, 99–131.
Laruelle, A. and Valenciano, F. (forthcoming), Assessing success and decisiveness in voting situations, Social Choice and Welfare.
Owen, G. (1975), Multilinear extensions and the Banzhaf value, Naval Re-search Logistics Quarterly 22, 741–750.
Owen, G. (1977), Values of games with a priori unions, in R. Hein and O. Moeschlin (eds), Essays in Mathematical Economics and Game Theory New York: Springer-Verlag, 76–88.
Owen, G. (1982), Modification of the Banzhaf–Coleman index for games with a priori unions, in M. J. Holler (ed.), Power, Voting, and Voting Power. Würzburg: Physica-Verlag, 232–238.
Shapley, L. S. (1953), A value for n-person games, Annals of Mathematical Studies 28, 307–317.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Laruelle, A., Valenciano, F. On The Meaning Of Owen–Banzhaf Coalitional Value In Voting Situations. Theory and Decision 56, 113–123 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-004-5639-1
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-004-5639-1