Abstract
We often explain by citing an absence or an omission. Apart from the problem of assigning a causal role to such apparently negative factors as absences and omissions, there is a puzzle as to why only some absences and omissions, out of indefinitely many, should figure in explanations. In this paper we solve this ’many absences problem’ by using the contrastive model of explanation. The contrastive model of explanation is developed by adapting Peter Lipton’s account. What initially appears to be only a trivial amendment to Lipton’s Difference Condition enables us both to offer a much more satisfactory solution to the ’many absences problem’ than David Lewis did, and also to explain why explanation in terms of absences and omissions should be so common.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahn, W., Kalish, C. (2000). The role of mechanism beliefs in causal reasoning. In F. Keil, R. Wilson (Eds.), Explanation and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp 199–225
Beebee H. (2004) Causing and nothingness. In: Collins J. D., Hall E. J., Paul L. A. (Eds.), Causation and counterfactuals. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 291–308
Choi I., Nisbett R., Norenzayan A. (1999) Causal attribution across cultures: Variation and universality. Psychological Bulletin 125(1): 47–63
Day M., Botterill G. (2008) Contrast, inference and scientific realism. Synthèse 160: 249–267
Dowe P. (2001) A counterfactual theory of prevention and ‘causation’ by omission. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79: 216–226
Garfinkel A. (1981) Forms of explanation. Yale University Press, New Haven and London
Hansson B. (1974) Explanations—of what?. Unpublished typescript, Stanford and Lund
Hempel C. G. (1965) Aspects of scientific explanation. Collier Macmillan, London and New York
Hilton D. (1990) Conversational processes and causal explanation. Psychological Bulletin 107: 65–81
Lewis D. (2000) Causation as influence. Journal of Philosophy 97: 182–197
Lipton P. (1990) Contrastive explanation. In: Knowles D. (Ed.), Explanation and its limits. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 247–266
Lipton, P. (1991). Inference to the best explanation (2nd edn) (2004). London and New York: Routledge.
Schaffer J. (2005) Contrastive causation. Philosophical Review 114: 327–358
van Fraassen B. C. (1980) The scientific image. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lavelle, J.S., Botterill, G. & Lock, S. Contrastive explanation and the many absences problem. Synthese 190, 3495–3510 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0205-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0205-9