Abstract
Integration (interaction among parts of an entity) is suggested to be necessary for individuality (contra, Metaphysics and the Origin of Species). A synchronic species is an integrated individual that can evolve as a unified whole; a diachronic lineage is a non-integrated historical entity that cannot evolve. Synchronic species and diachronic lineages are consequently suggested to be ontologically distinct entities, rather than alternative perspectives of the same underlying entity (contra Baum (1998), Syst. Biol. 47, 641–653; de Queiroz (1995), Endless Forms: Species and Speciation, pp. 57–75; Genes, Categories and Species). Species concepts usually refer to either one or the other entity; for instance, the Biological Species Concept refers to synchronic species, whereas the Cladistic Species Concept refers to diachronic lineages. The debate over species concepts has often failed to recognise this distinction, resulting in invalid comparisons between definitions that attempt to delineate fundamentally different entities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ayers M.R. 1974. 'Individuals Without Sortals'. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 23: 113–148.
Baum D. 1998. 'Individuality and Existence of Species Through Time'. Systematic Biology 47: 641–653.
Baum D. and Shaw K. 1995. Genealogical Perspectives on the Species Problem. In: Hoch P.C. and Stephenson A.G. (eds), Experimental and Molecular Approaches to Plant Biosystematics. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, pp. 289–303.
Cain A.J. 1954. Animal Species and Their Evolution. Harper and Row, New York.
Cracraft J. 1989. Species as Entities of Biological Theory. In: Ruse M. (ed.), What the Philosophy of Biology Is - Essays for David Hull. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 33–54.
de Queiroz K. 1995. The Definitions of Species and Clade Names: A Reply to Ghiselin. Biology and Philosophy 10: 223–228.
de Queiroz K. 1998. The General Lineage Concept of Species, Species Criteria, and the Process of Speciation: A Conceptual Unification and Terminological Recommendations. In: Howard D.J. and Berlocher S.H. (eds), Endless Forms: Species and Speciation. Oxford University Press, NewYork, pp. 57–75.
Ereshefsky M. 1988. Axiomatics and Individuality: A Reply to Williams's ''Species Are Individuals''. Philosophy of Science 55: 427–434.
Ereshefsky M. (ed.) 1991. The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Ghiselin M.T. 1974. A Radical Solution to the Species Problem.Systematic Zoology 23: 536–544.
Ghiselin M.T. 1997 Metaphysics and the Origin of Species. State University of NewYork Press, Albany, NY.
Grene M. 1989. Interaction and Evolution. In: Ruse M. (ed.),What the Philosophy of Biology Is - Essays for David Hull. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 67–73.
Hey J. 2001. Genes, Categories, and Species - The Evolutionary and Cognitive Causes of the Species Problem. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Hull D.L. 1978. A Matter of Individuality. Philosophy of Science 45: 335–360.
Kluge A.G. 1990. Species as Historical Individuals. Biology and Philosophy 5: 417–431.
Lewis D. 1991. Parts of Classes. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
Mayr E. 1963. Animal Species and Evolution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Mayr E. 2000a. The Biological Species Concept. In: Wheeler Q.D. and Meier R. (eds), Species Concepts and Phylogenetic Theory; A Debate. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 17–29.
Mayr E. 2000b. A Critique from the Biological Species Concept Perspective: What Is a Species, and What Is Not? In: Wheeler Q.D. and Meier R. (eds), Species Concepts and Phylogenetic Theory: A Debate. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 93–100.
Meier R. and Willmann R. 2000. The Hennigian Species Concept. In: Wheeler Q.D. and Meier R. (eds), Species Concepts and Phylogenetic Theory: A Debate. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 30–43.
Mishler B.D. and Brandon R.N. 1987. Individuality, Pluralism, and the Phylogenetic Species Concept. Biology and Philosophy 2: 397–414.
Sober E. 1993. Philosophy of Biology. Westview Press, Boulder.
Wheeler Q.D. and Meier R. (eds) 2000. Species Concepts and Phylogenetic Theory: A Debate. Columbia University Press, New York.
Wiley E.O. 1980. Is the Evolutionary Species Fiction? - A Consideration of Classes, Individuals and Historical Entities. Systematic Zoology 29: 76–80.
Wiley E.O. and Mayden R.L. 2000. The Evolutionary Species Concept. In: Wheeler Q.D. and Meier R. (eds), Species Concepts and Phylogenetic Theory. A Debate. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 70–89.
Williams G.C. 1992. Natural Selection: Domains, Levels, and Challenges. Oxford University Press, New York.
Willmann R. and Meier R. 2000. A Critique from the Hennigian Species Concept Perspective. In: Wheeler Q.D. and Meier R. (eds), Species Concepts and Phylogenetic Theory: A Debate. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 101–118.
Wilson R.A (ed.) 1999. Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, M., Wolsan, M. Integration, individuality and species concepts. Biology & Philosophy 17, 651–660 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022596904397
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022596904397