Abstract
According to a commonly held view, the properties of condensed-matter systems are simply consequences of the properties of their atomic-level components, and all of theoretical research in condensed-matter physics consists essentially in deducing the former from the latter. I argue that this apparently plausible picture is totally misleading, and that condensed-matter physics is a discipline which is not only autonomous, but guaranteed in the long run to be fundamental.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
S. L. Glashow,Physics Today, (February 1986), p. 11.
T. S. Kuhn,The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1962).
T. S. Kuhn, inCriticism and the Growth of Knowledge, I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave, eds. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1970), pp. 4–5.
K. R. Popper,ibid., in pp. 53 and 54.
L. D. Landau,Zhurn. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 30, 1058 (1956): translation,Soviet Physics JETP 3, 920 (1957).
T. Y. Petrosky and I. Prigogine,Can. J. Phys. 68, 670 (1990).
A. J. Leggett,Found. Phys. 18, 939 (1988), and references cited therein.
C. D. Tesche,Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 2358 (1990).
G. Zimanyi and A. Vladar,Phys. Rev. A 34, 3496 (1986).
L. de Broglie,Nonlinear Wave Mechanics: A Causal Interpretation, (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1960).
J. Bub,Nuovo Cimento 57B, 503 (1968).
P. Pearle,Phys. Rev. D 13, 857 (1976).
S. Weinberg,Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 485 (1989).
G. Ghirardi, A. Rimini and T. Weber,Phys. Rev. D 34, 470 (1986).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Leggett, A.J. On the nature of research in condensed-state physics. Found Phys 22, 221–233 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01893613
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01893613