Skip to main content
Log in

Strict Fregean free logic

  • Published:
Journal of Philosophical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Ermanno Bencivenga, “Free logics”, in Gabbay and Guenthner, eds.,Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Vol. III:Alternatives to Classical Logic (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1986), 373–425.

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. Bencivenga, “Free semantic”, in Dalla Chiara, ed.,Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science;Italian Studies in the Philosophy of Science 47 (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1980), 31–48.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ermanno Bencivenga, “Truth, correspondence, and non-denoting singular terms”,Philosophia 9 (1980), 219–29.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rene Descartes,Meditation V of Meditations on First Philosophy, in Beardsley, ed.,The European Philosophers from Descartes to Nietzsche (New York: Modern Library, 1960), 25–79.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Heinz-Dieter Ebbinghaus, “Über eine Prädikatenlogik mit partiell definierten Prädikaten und Funktionen”,Arch. Math. Logik 12 (1969), 39–53.

    Google Scholar 

  6. N. Findlay,Meinong's Theory of Objects and Values (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gottlob Frege, “On sense and reference”, in Geach and Black, trs.,Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege (Oxford: Blackwell, 1966), 56–78.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nathaniel Hawthorne, “The ambitious guest”, inTwice-Told Tales, Vol. II (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1900), 121–35.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Richard Jeffrey,Formal Logic: Its Scope and Limits (New York: McGraw Hill, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  10. David Kaplan, “What is Russell's theory of descriptions?”, in Davidson and Harman, eds.,The Logic of Grammar (Encino, CA: Dickenson, 1975), 210–17.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stephen Cole Kleene,Introduction to Metamathematics (Princeton: Van Nostrand, 1952).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Karel Lambert, “Logical truth and microphysics”, in Lambert, ed.,The Logical way of Doing Things (New Haven: Yale, 1969), 93–117.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Robert K. Meyer and Karel Lambert, “Universally free logic and standard quantification theory”,J. Symb. Log. 33 (1968), 8–26.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rolf Schock, “On finitely many-valued logics”,Logique et Analyse 25–26 (1964), 43–58.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Brian Skyrms, “Supervaluations: identity, existence, and individual concepts”,J. Phil. 65 (1968), 477–82.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Timothy Smiley, “Sense without denotation”,Analysis 20 (1960), 125–85.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bas C. van Fraassen, “The completeness of free logic”,Zeitschr. f. math. Logik u. Grundlagen d. Math. 12 (1966), 219–34.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bas C. van Fraassen, “Singular terms, truth-value gaps, and free logic”,J. Phil. 63 (1966), 481–95.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Peter W. Woodruff, “Logic and truth-value gaps”, in Lambert, ed.,Philosophical Problems in Logic: Some Recent Developments (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1970), 121–42.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Eddy M. Zemach, “Vague objects”,Nous 25 (1991), 323–40.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lehmann, S. Strict Fregean free logic. J Philos Logic 23, 307–336 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048484

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048484

Navigation