Abstract
In the ordinary way of representing relations, the order of the relata plays a structural role, but in the states themselves such an order often does not seem to be intrinsically present. An alternative way to represent relations makes use of positions for the arguments. This is no problem for the love relation, but for relations like the adjacency relation and cyclic relations, different assignments of objects to the positions can give exactly the same states. This is a puzzling situation. The question is what is the internal structure of relations? Is the use of positions still justified, and if so, what is their ontological status? In this paper mathematical models for relations are developed that provide more insight into the structure of relations “out there” in the real world.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fine, K.: The Problem of De Re Modality, in J. Almog, J. Perry, and H. Wettstein (eds), Themes from Kaplan, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1989, pp. 197–272.
Fine, K.: Neutral relations, The Philosophical Review 109 (2000), 1–33.
Leo, J.: Modeling Relations, Logic Group Preprint Series 244, Department of Philosophy, Utrecht University, 2005.
Lowe, J.: Vague identity and quantum indeterminacy, Analysis 54 (1994), 110–114.
Williamson, T.: Converse relations, The Philosophical Review 94 (1985), 249–262.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Leo, J. MODELING RELATIONS. J Philos Logic 37, 353–385 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-007-9076-9
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-007-9076-9