Abstract
This article analyses the different connotations of “normality” and “being natural,” bringing together the theoretical discussion from both human medicine and veterinary medicine. We show how the interpretations of the concepts in the different areas could be mutually fruitful. It appears that the conceptions of “natural” are more elaborate in veterinary medicine, and can be of value to human medicine. In particular they can nuance and correct conceptions of nature in human medicine that may be too idealistic. Correspondingly, the wide ranging conceptions of “normal” in human medicine may enrich conceptions in veterinary medicine, where the discussions seem to be sparse. We do not argue that conceptions from veterinary medicine should be used in human medicine and vice versa, but only that it could be done and that it may well be fruitful. Moreover, there are overlaps between some notions of normal and natural, and further conceptual analysis on this overlap is needed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Including applied ethology, which is a field with extensive discussion on the theoretical aspects of animal welfare. We have chosen to use veterinary medicine as a simplified term for both of these branches of science.
The notion of nature can also be found in the conceptual debate on health and disease, where whether these terms refer to “natural kinds” is discussed. The debate on natural kinds refers to various naturalistic perspectives. Discussions of concepts as natural kinds are interesting and important, but are beyond the scope of this article.
Unfortunately, the same holds for the concept of health within veterinary medicine (see Lerner [11] for a thorough discussion on this).
See also Lerner [10, ch. 6] for a discussion on expert Swedish veterinarians’ usage of the terms.
References
Mendl, Michael, Oliver H.P. Burman, Richard M.A. Parker, and Elizabeth S. Paul. 2009. Cognitive bias as an indicator of animal emotion and welfare: Emerging evidence and underlying mechanisms. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 118: 161–181.
Smith, J. David. 2009. The study of animal metacognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13(9): 389–396.
Rollin, Bernard E. 1983. The concept of illness in veterinary medicine. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 182(2): 122–125.
Nordenfelt, Lennart. 2006. Animal and human health and welfare: A comparative philosophical analysis. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.
Rollin, Bernard E. 2006. Science and ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gunnarsson, Stefan. 2006. The conceptualisation of health and disease in veterinary medicine. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 48: 20–25.
Hofmann, Bjørn. 2003. Medicine as téchnê: A perspective from antiquity. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28(4): 403–425.
Enserink, Martin. 2007. Initiative aims to merge animal and human health science to benefit both. Science 316: 1553.
Murphy, Edmond. 1976. The logic of medicine. Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Hofmann, Bjørn. 2008. Hva er sykdom?. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.
Lerner, Henrik. 2008. The concepts of health, well-being and welfare as applied to animals: A philosophical analysis of the concepts with regard to the differences between animals. PhD diss. Linköping University.
Wakefield, Jerome C. 1992. The concept of mental disorder: On the boundary between biological facts and social values. American Psychologist 47(3): 373–388.
Thomas, Julia A., and Peter B. Moyle. 2002. Reconfiguring modernity: Concepts of nature in Japanese political ideology. Ewing, NJ: University of California Press.
Rollin, Bernard E. 2006. Animal rights and human morality. 3rd ed. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
Bostock, Stephen. 1993. Zoos and animal rights: The ethics of keeping animals. London: Routledge.
Lidfors, Lena, Charlotte Berg, and Bo Algers. 2005. Integration of natural behaviour in housing systems. Ambio 34(4–5): 325–330.
Algers, Bo. 1990. Naturligt beteende—ett naturligt begrepp? Svensk Veterinärtidning 42(12): 517–519.
Algers, Bo. 2001. Naturligt beteende som riktlinje i djurhållningen. In The proceedings of Ekologiskt Lantbruk Ultuna 13–15 november 2001, 114–117. Uppsala, Centrum för Uthålligt Lantbruk, Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet.
Malm, Kerstin. 2004. Naturligt beteende—finns det? Djurskyddet 112(5): 8–9.
Boorse, Christopher. 1975. On the distinction between disease and illness. Philosophy & Public Affairs 5: 49–68.
Boorse, Christopher. 1976. What a theory of mental health should be. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 6: 62.
Boorse, Christopher. 1977. Health as a theoretical concept. Philosophy of science 44: 542–573.
Boorse, Christopher. 1997. A rebuttal on health. In What is disease?, ed. J. Humber, and R. Almeder. New Jersey: Humana Press.
Wakefield, Jerome C. 1996. Dysfunction as a value free concept: A reply to Sadler and Agich. Philosophy, Psychiatry and Psychology 2(3): 233–346.
Aspinall, K.W. 1976. First steps in veterinary science. London: Baillière Tindall.
Löliger, Hans C. 1985. Poultry health as a criterion of welfare. In Proceedings of the second European symposium on poultry welfare, 56–62. Celle, Germany: German Branch of the World’s Poultry Science Association.
Murphy, Edmond A. 1972. The normal and the perils of the sylleptic argument. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 15: 566–582.
Murphy, Edmond A. 1973. The normal. American Journal of Epidemiology 98: 403–411.
Murphy, Edmond A. 1979. The epistemology of normality. Psychological Medicine 9: 409–415.
Canguilhem, Georges. 1978. On the normal and the pathological. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Co.
Helbig, Andreas J., Alan G. Knox, David T. Parkin, George Sangster, and Martin Collinson. 2002. Guidelines for assigning species rank. Ibis 144: 518–525.
Lindstrøm, Jon A. 2009. Carving mental disorder at the joints: An essay in the philosophy of psychopathology. PhD diss. University of Oslo.
Acknowledgments
This study was partly financed by a travel grant from NordForsk Nordic Network for the Philosophy of Medicine and Medical Ethics (NNPMME).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lerner, H., Hofmann, B. Normality and naturalness: A comparison of the meanings of concepts used within veterinary medicine and human medicine. Theor Med Bioeth 32, 403–412 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-011-9184-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-011-9184-y