A recent book of mine defends three distinct varieties of immortality. One of them is an infinitely lengthy afterlife; however, any hopes of it might seem destroyed by something like Brandon Carter's 'doomsday argument' against viewing ourselves as extremely early humans. The apparent difficulty might be overcome in two ways. First, if the world is non-deterministic then anything on the lines of the doomsday argument may prove unable to deliver a strongly pessimistic conclusion. Secondly, anything on those lines may break down when an infinite sequence of experiences is in question. ©2008 The Royal Institute of Philosophy.
CITATION STYLE
Leslie, J. (2008). Infinitely long afterlives and the doomsday argument. Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819108000867
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.