Abstract
The paper discusses whether codes of ethics are Kantian notions through an analysis of their intention and structure. The article also discusses some of the ideas put forward by William Starr in his article, ‘Codes of Ethics — Towards a Rule-Utilitarian Justification’,Journal of Business Ethics 2(2) (May 1983).
The paper refers to recent definitions of codes of ethics and considers reasons for the proliferation of such codes. It examines the moral justification for these codes and analyses the underlying ethical theory particularly in relation to Kantian ethics. There is an account of how Kant's views of the source of morality and moral obligation, the structure and nature of Kantian moral law and the role of the individual and his/her relationship with others, which is relevant to the development of a theoretical base for codes of ethics. There is some discussion of potential problems in the practical application of Kantian ethics to a specific code.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Jacquie L'Etang studied for her BA(Hons.) in American and English History at the University of East Anglia, her MA in Commonwealth History at the University of London and her M.Sc. in Public Relations at the University of Sterling. She worked for a year in the External Relations Department of the London School of Economics and for eleven years at the British Council a period which included four postings in the public relations and design and editorial departments. Since 1989 she has been Assistant Director of the M.Sc. in Public Relations by Distance Learning and in 1991 completed her second dissertation on corporate social responsibility for her M. Phil. in Social Justice which she studied for at the University of Stirling's Philosophy Department.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
L'Etang, J. A Kantian approach to codes of ethics. J Bus Ethics 11, 737–744 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00872305
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00872305