Skip to main content
Log in

Reproductive technologies and the “survival” of the “human subject”

  • Published:
Human Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Bleier, R. (1991). Science and gender. In Sneja Gunew (Ed.),A reader in feminist knowledge. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Code, L. (1991).What can she know? Feminist theory and the construction of knowledge. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dueli-Klein, R. (1979). How we do what we want to do: Thoughts about feminist methodology. In G. Bowles and R. Dueli-Klein (Eds.),Theories of women's studies. London and Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1959).The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitzinger, S. (1978).Women as mothers: How they see themselves in different cultures. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, E. (1977).Power and illness: The political sociology of health and medical care. New York: Elsevier North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levesque-Lopman, L. (1988).Claiming reality: Phenomenology and women's experience. Savage, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levesque-Lopman, L. (forthcoming).Speaking from experience: The impact of technology on pregnancy and childbirth. Savage, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

  • Mies, M. (1979). Toward a methodology for feminist research. In Bowles and Dueli-Klein.

  • Reinharz, S. (1988). What's missing in miscarriage?Journal of Community Psychology 16(1): 34–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. (1987).The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, L. and S. Wise, (1983).Breaking out: feminist consciousness and feminist research. London and Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westcott, M. (1979). Feminist criticism of the social sciences.Harvard Educational Review 49 (4): 422–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, K.H. (1991).Survival and sociology: Vindicating the human subject. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I wish to thank Kurt H. Wolff, Mildred Bakan, Eleanor Godway, James Ostrow and David Rehorick for their very useful comments and suggestions.

This paper was written while I was a Visiting Research Scholar at the Wellesley College Center for Research on Women and with the support of a Regis College Faculty Grant.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Levesque-Lopman, L. Reproductive technologies and the “survival” of the “human subject”. Hum Stud 16, 329–340 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01323142

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01323142

Keywords

Navigation