Abstract
This paper is concerned with the everyday practice of authority and knowledge in a group home for adults with intellectual disability. Based on fieldwork, the group home is understood as a workplace, which provides a model of organizational participation as a dilemma of freedom rather than a problem of power. Three kinds of work are observed in the everyday ‘know-how’ of counselors and residents. First, Michael Lipsky’s concept of “street-level bureaucracy” is used to understand the inherently indeterminate and conflictual nature of counselor work. Second, the competent participation of residents is also organized as work, often explicitly, as the work they must do to “become more independent.” The group home is therefore understood as a setting of governmentality because it reflects the indirect practice of authority characteristic of contemporary liberal societies. Finally, the ethnomethodological insight about the accomplished character of local order is the basis for the observation of everyday life itself as a third kind of work.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angrosino, M. (1997). Opportunity House: Ethnographic Stories of Mental Retardation. London: Sage Publications.
Angrosino, M. (1992). Metaphors of Stigma: How Deinstitutionalized Mentally Retarded Adults See Themselves. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 21: 171–199.
Attewell, P. (1992). Skill and Occupational Changes in U.S. Manufacturing. In P. Adler (Ed.), Technology and the Future of Work. New York: Oxford University Press.
Attewell, P. (1990). What is Skill? Work and Occupations 17: 422–448.
Attewell, P. (1986). Imperialism Within Complex Organizations. Sociological Theory 4: 115–125.
Barnes, C. and Oliver, M. (1995). Disability Rights: Rhetoric and Reality in the UK. Disability & Society 10: 111–116.
Bercovici, S.M. (1983). Barriers to Normalization: The Restrictive Management of Retarded Persons. Baltimore: University Park Press.
Baistow, K. (1994–1995). Liberation and Regulation? Some Paradoxes of Empowerment. Critical Social Policy. Issue 42.
Baker, C. (1984). The ‘Search for adultness’: Membership Work in Adolescent Talk. Human Studies 7: 301–323.
Blau, P. (1963). The Dynamics of Bureaucracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Cicourel, A. (1974). Cognitive Sociology: Language and Meaning in Social Interaction. Hammondsworth: Penguin Education.
Copp, M. (1998). Adult ‘Adolescents’: Social Control of Sexuality and Adulthood in People with Developmental Disabilities. Sociological Analysis 1: 113–135.
Cruikshank, B. (1999). The Will to Empower: Democratic Citizens and Other Subjects. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Cushman, P. (1991). Ideology Obscured: Political Uses of the Self in Daniel Stern’s Infant. American Psychologist 46: 206–219.
Dean, M. (1999). Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. London: Sage Publications.
Dean, M. (1995). Governing the Unemployed Self in an Active Society. Economy and Society. 24: 559–583.
Dudley, J. R. (1983). Living With Stigma: The Plight of the People Who We Label Mentally Retarded. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas.
Foster, S. B. (1987). The Politics of Caring. London: The Falmer Press.
Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell and P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Garfinkel, H. (1967/1984). Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York: Polity Press.
Garfinkel, H. (1986). Ethnomethodological Studies of Work. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Garfinkel, H. and Sacks, H. (1970). On Formal Structures of Practical Action. In J.C. KcKinney and E. Tiryakian (Eds.), Theoretical Sociology. East Norwalk: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Garfinkel, H. and Wieder, D.L. (1992). Two Incommensurable, Asymmetrical Alternate Technologies of Social Analysis. In G. Watson and R. Seiler (Eds.), Text in Context: Contributions to Ethnomethodology. London: Sage Publications.
Gillman, M., Heyman, B. and Swain, J. (2000). What’s in a Name? The Implications of Diagnosis for People with Learning Difficulties. Disability and Society 15: 389–409.
Gluckman, M. (1956). Foreward. In V. Turner (Eds.), Schism and Continuity in an African Society. Manchester University Press.
Gluckman, M. (1967). Introduction. In A.L. Epstein (Ed.), The Craft of Social Anthropology. London: Tavistock.
Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. New York: Anchor Books.
Goode, D. (1994). A World Without Words: The Social Construction of Children Born Deaf and Blind. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Gouldner, A. (1954). Patterns of Industrial Bureaucracy. New York: The Free Press.
Hacking, I. (1999). The Social Construction of What? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Hacking, I. (1986). Making Up People. In T. Heller, M. Sosna, and D. Wellberry (Eds.), Reconstructing Individualism. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Hawes, J. (1991). The Children’s Rights Movement: A History of Advocacy and Protection. Boston: Twayne Publishers.
Johnson, K. (1998). Deinstitutionalizing Women: An Ethnographic Study of Institutional Closure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kliewer, C. and Drake, S. (1998). Disability, Eugenics and the Current Ideology of Segregation: A Modern Tale. Disability and Society 13: 95–111.
Juravich, T. (1985). Chaos on the Shop Floor: A Worker’s View of Quality, Productivity, and Management. Philadephia: Temple University Press.
Katz, S. (2000). Busy bodies: Activity, Aging, and the Management of Everyday Life. Journal of Aging Studies 14: 135–170.
Kusterer, K. (1978). Workplace Knowhow: The Important Working Knowledge of Unskilled Workers. Boulder: Westview Press.
Lipsky, M. (1979). Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Lynch, M. (1993). Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action: Ethnomethodology and Social Studies of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Merton, R. (1957). Social Theory and Social Structure. Glencoe: The Free Press.
Miller, G. (1994). Toward Ethnographies of Institutional Discourse. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 3: 281–308.
Mitchell, J.C. (1983). Case and Situation Analysis. The Sociological Review 31: 187–211.
Postman, N. (1982). The Disappearance of Childhood. New York: Vintage Books.
Robillard, A. (1999). Meaning of a Disability: The Lived Experience of Paralysis. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Rose, N. (1998). Governing Risky Individuals: The Role of Psychiatry in New Regimes of Control. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 5: 177–195.
Rose, N. (1999). Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rose, N. (1996). Inventing Our Selves: Psychology, Power and Personhood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sacks, H. (1992a). Lectures on Conversation, Volume 1. (Ed.) G. Jefferson. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sacks, H. (1992b). Lectures on Conversation, Volume 2. (Ed.) G. Jefferson. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sacks, H. (1987). On the Preferences for Agreement and Contiguity in Sequences in Conversation. In G. Button and J. Lee (Eds.), Talk and Social Organization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sacks, H. (1975). Everyone Has to Lie. In M. Sanches and B.G. Blount (Eds.), Sociocultural Dimensions of Language Use. New York: Academic Press.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. and Jefferson, G. (1974). A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-taking in Conversation. Language 50: 696–735.
Schegloff, E. (1982). Discourse as an Interactional Accomplishment: Some Uses of ‘Uh-huh’ and Other Things That Come Between Sentences. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
Schegloff, E. and Sacks, H. (1974). Opening up Closings. In R. Turn (Ed.), Ethnomethodology. Hammondsworth: Penguin.
Schutz, A. (1970). On Phenomenology and Social Relations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Selznick, P. (1948). Foundations of the Theory of Organizations. American Sociological Review. 13: 25–35.
Silverman, D. (1998). Harvey Sacks: Social Science and Conversation Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Simpson, M. (1995). The Sociology of ‘Competence’ in Learning Disability Services. Social Work and Social Sciences Review 6: 85–97.
Taylor, S. (2001). The Continuum and Current Controversies in the USA. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability 26: 15–33.
Taylor, S., Bogdan, R. and Lutfiyya, Z. (1995). (Eds.), The Variety of Community Experience: Qualitative Studies of Family and Community Integration. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
Van Velsen, J. (1967). The Extended-case Method and Situational Analysis. In A.L Epstein (Ed.), The Craft of Social Anthropology. London: Tavistock.
Wolfensberger, W. (1989). Human Service Policies: The Rhetoric Versus The Reality. In L. Barton (Ed.), Disability and Dependency. London: Falmer Press.
Wrigley, J. (1989). Do Young Children Need Intellectual Stimulation? Experts’ Advice to Parents, 1900–1985. History of Education Quarterly 29: 41–75.
Yeatman, A. (1998). Interpreting Contemporary Contractualism. In M. Dean and B. Hindess (Eds.), Governing Australia: Studies in Contemporary Rationalities of Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zuboff, S. (1988). In the Age of Smart Machines: The Future of Work and Power. New York: Basic Books.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Levinson, J. The Group Home Workplace and the Work of Know-How. Hum Stud 28, 57–85 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-005-3597-4
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-005-3597-4