Skip to main content
Log in

Unifying Foundations – to be Seen in the Phenomenon of Language

  • Published:
Foundations of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Scientific knowledge develops in an increasingly fragmentary way.A multitude of scientific disciplines branch out. Curiosity for thisdevelopment leads into quests for a unifying understanding. To a certain extent, foundational studies provide such unification. There is a tendency, however, also of a fragmentary growth of foundational studies, like in a multitude of disciplinaryfoundations. We suggest to look at the foundational problem, not primarily as a search for foundations for one discipline in another, as in some reductionist approach, but as a steady revelation ofpresuppositions for individual scientific theories – which are boundto meet, sooner or later, in a common language. A decisive point hereis our holistic conception of language, as a whole of description-interpretation processes which are entangled(complementary) in the language itself. For every language there is alinguistic complementarity. We suggest this unique form ofentanglement as a unifying presupposition, ultimately foundational forall communicable knowledge. Involved is a linguistic realism, in terms ofwhich we critically examine ``language-world'' problems, as exposed byWittgenstein, and Russell, about a foundational interdependence of language andreality (world). Throughout, we attach to the developmentof foundational studies of mathematics, logics, and the naturalsciences. In particular, we study the interpretation problem foraxioms of infinity in some detail. We emphasize that the holistic concept of language contradicts Carnap's semiotic fragmentation thesis (thus, no clean cutbetween syntax, semantics, pragmatics).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Aerts, D. and F. Rohrlich: 1998, Reduction. Foundations of Science 1: 27–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, R: 1972, Systems and Their Informational Measures. In G. Klir G (ed.), Trends in General Systems Theory. New York: Wiley, 78–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Benthem, Johan: 1982. The Logical Study of Science. Synthese 51: 431–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beth, Evert Willem: 1959, The Foundations of Mathematics. A study in the philosophy of science (Studies in logic and the foundations of mathematics). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohr, Niels: 1928, The Quantum Postulate and the Recent Development of Atomic Theory. Nature 121 (suppl.): 580–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, Mario: 1967, Scientific Research II: the Search for Truth. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, Rudolf: 1968, Introduction to Semantics and Formalization of Logic. Cambridge,MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chew, Geoffrey: 1968, Bootstrap: A Scientific Idea? Science 161: 762–765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Church, A: 1941, The Calculi of Lambda Conversion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. (ed.): 1965, The Undecidable. New York: Raven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, R: 1986, Meditations on First Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • d'Espagnat, Bernard: 1989, Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, 2nd edition. New York: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feferman, Solomon: 1981, The Logic of Mathematical Discovery Versus the Logical Structure of Mathematics. In P. Asquith and I. Hacking (eds.), PSA 1978: Proc. of the 1978 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Vol. 2. Reprinted in (Feferman, 1998), 309-327.

  • Feferman, Solomon: 1998, In the Light of Logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feigl, Herbert: 1949. The Logical Character of the Principle of Induction. In H. Feigl and W. Sellars (eds.), Readings in Philosophical Analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Ctofts, 297–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraenkel, A: 1966, Set Theory and Logic. London: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraenkel, A., Y. Bar-Hillel and A. Levy: 1973, Foundations of Set Theory, 2nd revised edition. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gödel, K: 1934, On Undecidable Propositions of Formal Mathematical Systems. Mimeographed notes on lectures given at the Institute for Advanced Studies, Princeton. In Davis 1965, 39-71.

  • Gödel, K: 1965, Postscriptum [to Gödel 1934]. In (Davis, 1965), 71-73.

  • Kemeny, J: 1953, The Use of Simplicity in Induction. The Philosophical Review 62: 391–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, Imre (ed.): 1967, Problems in the Philosophy of Mathematics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, Azriel: 1979, Basic Set Theory. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löfgren, Lars: 1966, Explicability of Sets and Transfinite Automata. InE. Caianiello (ed.), Automata Theory. New York: Academic Press, 251–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löfgren, Lars: 1967, Recognition of Order and Evolutionary Systems. In J. Tou (ed.), Computer and Information Sciences: Proceedings of the 2d computer and information sciences symposium: 1966, vol. 2. New York, London: Academic Press, 165–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löfgren, Lars: 1968, An Axiomatic Explanation of Complete Self-Reproduction. The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 30: 415–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löfgren, Lars: 1973, Formalizability of Learning and Evolution. In P. Suppes et al. (eds.), Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science IV. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company, 647–658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löfgren, Lars: 1976, Syntactic and Semantic Reduction of Theories. Abstract. J Symbolic Logic 41: 268–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löfgren, Lars: 1977, Complexity of Descriptions of Systems: A Foundational Study. Int. J. General Systems 3: 197–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löfgren, Lars: 1977e, On Existence and Existential Perception. Synthese 35: 431–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löfgren, Lars: 1978, Some Foundational Views on General Systems and the Hempel Paradox. Int. J. General Systems 4: 243–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löfgren, Lars: 1981, Knowledge of Evolution and Evolution of Knowledge. In E. Jantsch (ed.), The Evolutionary Vision: Toward a Unifying Paradigm of Physical, Biological, and Sociocultural Evolution (AAAS selected symposia series; 61). Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 129–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löfgren, Lars: 1981a, Life as an Autolinguistic Phenomenon. In M. Zeleny (ed.), Autopoiesis, a Theory of Living Organization. New York: North Holland, 236–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löfgren, Lars: 1987, Understandings of Reduction. In J. Rose (ed.), Cybernetics and System: Present and Future: Proceedings of the 7th International Cong of Cybernetics and Systems, London, September 7-11, Vol. 1. Lytham St. Annes: Thales Publ., 448–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löfgren, Lars: 1988, Towards System: From Computation to the Phenomenon of Language. In M. Carvallo (ed.), Nature, Cognition and System I. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 129–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löfgren, Lars: 1990, On the Partiality of Self-Reference. In F. Heylighen et al. (eds.), Self-steering and Cognition in Complex Systems. New York: Gordon and Breach, 47–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löfgren, Lars: 1992, Complementarity in Language; Toward a General Understanding. In M. Carvallo (ed.), Nature, Cognition and System II. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 113–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löfgren, Lars: 1993, Linguistic Realism and Issues in Quantum Philosophy. In K. Laurikainen and C. Montonen (eds.), Symposia on the Foundations of Modern Physics 1992: The Copenhagen Interpretation and Wolfgang Pauli: Helsinki, Finland, June-August 1992. London: World Scientific, 297–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löfgren, Lars: 1994, General Complementarity and the Double-Prism Experiment. In K. Laurikainen et al. (eds.), Foundations of Modern Physics 1994: 70 Years of Matter Waves. Paris: Éditions Frontièrs, 155–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löfgren, Lars: 2000, Understandings of Time in Complementaristic Language. In Patrick Baert (ed.), Time in Contemporary Intellectual Thought, Amsterdam: Elsevier, Chapter 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löfgren, Lars: 2002, What is Systems Science? In R. Trappl (ed.), Cybernetics and Systems 2002, Vol. 1. Austrian Society for Cybernetic Studies, 11-16.

  • Mendelson, E: 1979, Introduction to Mathematical Logic, 2nd edition. New York: Van Nostrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A: 1971, The Popper-Carnap Controversy. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G: 1982, Zermelo's Axiom of Choice: Its Origins, Development, and Influence. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mostowski, Andrzej: 1966, Thirty Years of Foundational Studies: Lectures on the Development of Mathematical Logic and the Study of the Foundations of Mathematics in 1930-1964. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mostowski, Andrzej: 1967, Recent Results in Set Theory. In Imre Lakatos (ed.), Problems in the Philosophy of Mathematics. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 82–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, A.: 1968, Quantum Physics and the Philosophical Tradition. Cambridge,MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl: 1959, The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Hilary: 1975, Mind, Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers, Volume 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine,W: 1963, On Simple Theories of a Complex World. Synthese 15: 103–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand: 1922, Introduction to Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. In (Wittgenstein, 1961).

  • Russell, Bertrand: 1940, An Inquiry into Meaning and Truth. London: George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand: 1948, History of Western Philosophy. London: George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand: 1961, Our Knowledge of the External World. London: George Allen. First published in 1914.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoenfield, J: 1967, Mathematical Logic. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead A and B. Russell: 1962, Principia Mathematica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. First edition in 1910.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig: 1961, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. First published in 1921.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Löfgren, L. Unifying Foundations – to be Seen in the Phenomenon of Language. Foundations of Science 9, 135–189 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FODA.0000025037.28557.ea

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FODA.0000025037.28557.ea

Navigation