Skip to main content
Log in

A Note on Partial Meet Package Contraction

  • Published:
Journal of Logic, Language and Information Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It was shown that finite P-recovery holds for partial meet package contraction in Furhmann and Hansson (1994). However, it is not known if recovery holds for partial meet package contraction in the infinite case. In this paper, I show that recovery does not hold for partial meet package contraction in the infinite case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alchourrón, C.E. and Makinson, D., 1981, “Hierarchies of regulation and their logic,” pp. 125–148 in New studies in Deontic Logic, R. Hilpinen, ed., Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alchourrón, C.E., Gärdenfors, P., and Makinson, D., 1985, “On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions,” Journal of Symbolic Logic 50, 510–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuhrmann, A. and Hansson, S.O., 1994, “A survey of multiple contraction,” Journal of Logic, Language, and Information 3, 39–76.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, J. A Note on Partial Meet Package Contraction. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 7, 139–142 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008274907099

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008274907099

Navigation