Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Equality and Inequality in Confucianism

  • Published:
Dao Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This essay studies equality and inequality in Confucianism. By studying Confucius, Mencius, Xunzi, and other classic thinkers, I argue that Confucian equality is manifested in two forms. Numerical equality is founded in the Mencian belief that every person is born with the same moral potential and the Xunzian notion that all people have the same xing and the same potential for moral cultivation. It is also manifested in the form of role-based equality. Proportional equality, however, is the main notion of equality in Confucian philosophy. Proportional equality is realized in moral, economic, and political realms. On the basis of these notions of Confucian equality, I propose two Confucian political principles for contemporary society. The first is the inclusive principle of general election by citizenry, and the second is the exclusive principle of qualification for public offices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aristotle. 1962. Nicomachean Ethics. New York: The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, Daniel. 2006. Beyond Liberal Democracy: Political Thinking for an East Asian Context. Princeton NJ.: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, Bryan. 2006. “The Myth of the Rational Voter,” online essay at http://www.catounbound.org/2006/11/06/bryan-caplan/the-myth-of-the-rational-voter/

  • Caplan, Bryan. 2007. The Myth of the Rational Voter: Why Democracies Choose Bad Policies. Princeton, NJ.: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Joseph (2007). “Democracy and Meritocracy: Toward a Confucian Perspective.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 34:2: 179–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwall, Stephen. 1977. “Two Kinds of Respect.” Ethics 88: 36–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Kingsley, and Wilbert Moore. 1944. “Some Principles of Stratification.” American Sociological Review 10:2: 242–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankfurt, Harry. 1997. “Equality and Respect.” Social Research 64.1: 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, David, and Roger Ames. 1999. The Democracy of the Dead. Chicago and Lasalle, IL: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herr, Ranjoo S. 2010. “Confucian Democracy and Equality.” Asian Philosophy 20.3: 261–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao, Kung-ch’uan 蕭公權. 1998. A History of Chinese Political Thought 中國政治思想史. Shenyang 沈陽: Liaoning Jiaoyu Chubanshev 遼寧教育出版社.

  • Knoblock, John. 1988. Xunzi: A Translation and Study of the Complete Works: Vol. I, Books 1–6. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. 1990. Xunzi: A Translation and Study of the Complete Works: Vol. II, Books 7–16. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kongzi Jiayu 孔子家語 (Confuciuss Family Teachings). 2003. Beijing: Zhongguo Wenshi Chubanshe 中國文史出版社.

  • Li, Chenyang. 2009. “Where Does Confucian Virtuous Leadership Stand?—A Critique of Daniel Bell’s Beyond Liberal Democracy,” Philosophy East & West 59.4: 531–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • _____. 2012. “Democratic Form and Confucian Substance.” In Chinese Philosophy and Culture 中國哲學與文化 10. Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong.

  • Lin, Yutang. 1937. The Importance of Living. New York: Quill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mencius. 1970. Translation with an introduction by D.C. Lau. Baltimore, MD: Penguin Books.

  • Munro, Donald. 1969. The Concept of Man in Early China. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuyen, A. T. 2001. “Confucianism and the Idea of Equality.” Asian Philosophy 11.2: 61–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1986. The First and Second Discourses and Essay on the Origin of Languages. Trans. By Victor Gourevitch, New York: Harper & Row, Publishers.

  • Tan, Sor-hoon. 2003. Confucian Democracy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • TTC (Thirteen Classics with Commentaries 十三經注疏). 1985 . Beijing: Zhongguo Shudian 中國書店.

  • TTM (Twenty-two Masters 二 十 二 子. 1986. Shanghai 上海: Shanghai Guji Chubanshe 上海古籍出版社.

  • Verba, Sidney. 2011. “Thoughts about Political Equality: What Is It? Why Do We Want It?” http://www.hks.harvard.edu/inequality/Summer/Summer01/papers/Verba.pdf.

  • Wang, Xianqian 王先谦. 1988. Collected Interpretations of the Xunzi 荀子集解. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju 中華書局.

  • Yao, Silian 姚思廉. 1986. Chen Shu in Twenty-Five Histories 二十五史 (v. 3). Shanghai: Shanghai Guji Chubanshe 上海古籍出版社.

  • Zhu, Xi 朱熹. 1985. Four Books and Five Classics 四書五經 (Vol. A, B, C). Beijing: Zhongguo Shudian 中國書店.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chenyang Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, C. Equality and Inequality in Confucianism. Dao 11, 295–313 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-012-9283-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-012-9283-0

Keywords

Navigation