Abstract
There is a common-sense view of language, which is held by Wittgenstein, Strawson Dummett, Searle, Putnam, Lewis, Wiggins, and others. According to this view a language consists of conventions, it is rule-governed, rules are conventionalised, a language is learnt, there are general learning mechanisms in the brain, and so on. I shall call this view the ‘ordinary language’ view of language. Chomsky’s attitude towards this view of language has been rather negative, and his rejection of it is a major motivation for the development of his own theory. In this paper I shall review Chomsky’s long-standing criticisms. I shall show that (1)Chomsky’s argument does not constitute a dismissal of the ‘ordinarylanguage’ view of language, (2) Chomsky’s conclusions about language do not follow from his argument, and (3) the ‘ordinary language’ view actually points to a promising way for us to understand the true nature of language and mind.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Baker, G. P. and P. M. S. Hacker: 1985, Wittgenstein: Rules, Grammar and Necessity, Blackwell, Oxford.
Bloomfield, L.: 1928, 'A Set of Postulates for the Science of Language', Language 2.Reprinted in M. Joos (ed.), Readings in Linguistics, American Council of Learned Sciences, Washington, 1957.
Bloomfield, L.: 1935, Language, Allen and Unwin, London.
Braine, M. D. S.: 1976, Children's First Word Combinations, University of Chicago Press for the Society for Research in Child Development.
Chomsky N.: 1975, Reflections on Language, Pantheon Books, New York.
Chomsky, N.: 1977, Essays on Form and Interpretation, North-Holland, New York.
Chomsky, N.: 1980a, 'Discussion of Putnam's Comments', in M. Piattelli-Palmarini (ed.) (1980), 310–24.
Chomsky, N.: 1980b, Rules and Representation, Columbia University Press, New York.
Chomsky, N.: 1986, Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use,Praeger, New York.
Chomsky, N.: 1988, Language and Problems of Knowledge: The Managua Lectures,MIT Press, London.
Chomsky, N.: 1993, 'Mental Constructions and Social Reality', in E. Renland and W. Abraham (eds.) Knowledge of Language, Vol. 1, Kluwer, London, 29–58.
Chomsky, N.: 1995a, 'Language and Nature', Mind 104, 1–61.
Chomsky, N.: 1995b, The Minimalist Program, MIT Press, London.
Dummett, M.: 1975, 'What is a Theory of Meaning? (II)', in G. Evans and J. McDowell (eds.), Truth and Meaning, Oxford University Press, London. Reprinted in Dummett (1993), 34–93.
Dummett, M.: 1978, 'What Do I Know When I Know a Language?'. First published as a paper presented at the Centenary Celebrations, Stockholm University. Reprinted in Dummett (1993), 94–105.
Dummett, M.: 1989, 'Language and Communication', in A. George (ed.), Reflections on Chomsky, Blackwell, Oxford. Reprinted in Dummett (1993), 166–87.
Dummett, M.: 1993, The Seas of Language, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Elman, J. L., E, A, Bates, M. H. Johnson, A. Karmiloff-Smith, D. Parisi, and K. Plunkett: 1996, Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development, MIT Press, London.
Fromkin, V. A.: 1997, 'Some Thoughts about the Brain/Mind/Language Interface', Lingua 100, 3–27.
Haegeman, L.: 1994, Introduction to Government and Binding Theory, 2nd edition, Blackwell, Oxford.
Jespersen, O.: 1924, The Philosophy of Grammar, Allen and Unwin, London. Reprinted in 1992 by University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Jespersen, O.: 1937, Analytic Syntax, Allen and Unwin, London. Reprinted in 1984 by University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Lewis, D.: 1975, 'Language and Languages', in K. Gunderson (ed.), Language, Mind, and Knowledge, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 3–35.
Lin, F. Y.: 1998, 'Jespersen, Skinner and Chomsky on Language', ms., Somerville College, Oxford.
Lust, B. (ed.): 1986, Studies in the Acquisition of Anaphor, Reidel, Dordrecht.
Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (ed.): 1980, Language and Learning: The Debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky, Routlege and Kegan Paul, London.
Pine, J. M. and E. V. M. Lieven: 1993, 'Reanalysing Rote-Learned Phrases: Individual Differences in the Transition to Multi-Word Speech', Journal of Child Language 20, 551–71.
Pinker, S. and P. Bloom: 1990, 'Natural Language and Natural Selection', Behavioural and Brain Sciences 13, 707–27.
Pinker, S.: 1994, The Language Instinct: The New Science of Language and Mind, Allen Lane, London.
Putnam, H.: 1980a, 'What is Innate and Why: Comments on the Debate', in Piattelli-Palmarini (ed.) (1980), 287–309.
Putnam, H.: 1980b, 'Comments on Chomsky's and Fodor's Replies', in Piattelli-Palmarini (ed.) (1980), 335–40.
Quine, W. V. O.: 1960, Word and Object, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Quine, W. V. O.: 1972, 'Methodological Reflections on Current Linguistic Theory', in G. Harman and D. Davidson (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language, Humanities Press, New York, 442–54.
Schlesinger, I. M.: 1977, Production and Comprehension of Utterances, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
Schlesinger, I. M.: 1982, Steps to Language: Towards a Theory of Native Language Acquisition, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
Searle, J. R.: 1972, 'Chomsky's Revolution in Linguistics', New York Review of Books, June 29.
Searle, J. R.: 1976, 'The Rules of the Language Game', Times Literary Supplement,10 September.
Searle, J. R.: 1980, 'Rules and Causation', The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, 37–9.
Strawson, P. F.: 1970, Meaning and Truth, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Strawson, P. F.: 1974, Subject and Predicate in Logic and Grammar, Methuen, London.
Vygotsky, I. S.: 1962, Thought and Language, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Wiggins, D.: 1997, 'Languages as Social Objects', Philosophy 72, 499–524.
Wittgenstein, L.: 1953, Philosophical Investigations, Blackwell, Oxford.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lin, F.Y. Chomsky On The ‘Ordinary Language’ View Of Language. Synthese 120, 151–191 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005088716396
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005088716396