Abstract
As the functional capabilities of high-tech medical products converge, supplying organizations seek new opportunities to differentiate their offerings. Embracing product sustainability-related differentiators provides just such an opportunity. This study examines the challenge organizations face when attempting to understand how customers perceive environmental and social dimensions of sustainability by exploring and defining both dimensions on the basis of a review of extant literature and focus group research with a leading supplier of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning equipment. The study encompasses seven hospitals and one private imaging center in the Netherlands and identifies five social aspects that cover 11 indicators. The authors conduct 22 customer perception interviews with key decision-making stakeholders involved in purchasing MRI scanning equipment. Respondents find environmental and social sustainability dimensions personally relevant but professionally secondary to cost, performance, and ability to use the equipment in their organizations’ physical infrastructure. Finally, incorporating a product’s environmental and social credentials within the marketing of MRI scanning equipment enhances the perception of the product offering in decision-making stakeholders’ minds and provides a means of differentiation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amaral, S. P., La Rovere, E. L. 2003. Indicators to Evaluate Environmental, Social, and Economic Sustainability: A Proposal for the Brazilian Oil Industry. Oil & Gas Journal 101(19), 30–35
Beverland, M., Lindgreen, A. 2006. Implementing Market Orientation in Industrial Firms: A Multiple Case Study. Industrial Marketing Management 36(4), 430–442
Cowell, S. J., Wehrmeyer, W., Argust, P. W., Graham, J., Robertson, S. 1999. Sustainability and the Primary Extraction Industries: Theories and Practice. Resources Policy 25(4), 277–286
Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review 14(4), 532–550
Fiksel, J., J. McDaniel and D. Spitzley: 1998, ‹Measuring Product Sustainability’, The Journal of Sustainable Product Design (July), 1–15
Friedman, M.: 1970, ‹The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits’, The New York Times Magazine, September 13
Funk, K. 2003. Sustainability and Performance. MIT SLOAN Management Review 44(2), 65–70
Gauthier, C. 2005. Measuring Corporate Social and Environmental Performance: The Extended Life-Cycle Assessment. Journal of Business Ethics 59(2), 199–206
Geibler, J. von, Liedtke, C., Wallbaum, H., Schaller, S. 2006. Accounting for the Social Dimension of Sustainability: Experiences from the Biotechnology Industry. Business Strategy and the Environment 15(5), 334–346
Global Reporting Initiative: 2006, ‹RG; Sustainability Reporting Guidelines’, Guidelines Developed by GRI, 19 September
van Heesch, T.: 2006, ‹Customer Value Analysis at Philips Medical Systems Magnetic Resonance. What’s the Fun of Selling Just on Price?’, Unpublished MA Thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, the Netherlands
Isaksson, R., Garvare, R. 2003. Measuring Sustainable Development Using Process Models. Managerial Auditing Journal 18(8), 649–656
Jick, T. D. 1979. Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action. Administrative Science Quarterly 24(4), 602–611
Keeble, J. J., Topiol, S., Berkeley, S. 2003. Using Indicators to Measure Sustainability Performance at a Corporate and Project Level. Journal of Business Ethics 44(2), 149–158
Lincoln, Y. S., Guba, E. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
Littig, B., Griessler, E. 2005. Social Sustainability: A Catchword Between Political Pragmatism and Social Theory. International Journal of Sustainable Development 8(1–2), 65–79
Maon, F., A. Lindgreen and V. Swaen: 2008, ‹Designing and Implementing Corporate Social Responsibility: An Integrative Framework Grounded in Theory and Practice’, Journal of Business Ethics, forthcoming
Matthyssens, P., Vandenbempt, K. 2003. Cognition-in-Context: Reorienting Research in Business Market Strategy. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing 18(6/7), 595–606
Newman, I., Benz, C. R. 1998. Qualitative-Quantitative Research Methodology: Exploring the Interactive Continuum. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Onwuegbuzie, A., Leech, N. L. 2005. Taking the ‹Q’ out of Research: Teaching Research Methodology Courses Without the Divide Between Quantitative and Qualitative Paradigms. Quality and Quantity 39(3), 267–296
Ottman, J.: 1997, ‹What Sustainability Means to Marketers’, Marketing News (July 15), 4
Philips Sustainability Report: 2006, Improving Lives, Delivering Value (Philips, Eindhoven, the Netherlands)
Seuring, S. A., Koplin, J., Behrens, T., Schenidewind, U. 2003. Sustainability Assessment in the German Detergent Industry: From Stakeholder Involvement to Sustainability Indicators. Sustainable Development 11(4), 199–212
Sherwin, C.: 2004, ‹Design and Sustainability: A Discussion Paper Based on Personal Experience and Observations’, The Journal of Sustainable Product Design 4(3), 21–31
SIGMA Project: 2007, Website 8, available at http://projectsigma.co.uk (accessed April 15, 2007)
Spiggle, S. 1994. Analysis and Interpretation of Qualitative Data in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research 21(3), 491–503
Steurer, R., Langer, M. E., Konrad, A., Martinuzzi, A. 2005. Corporations, Stakeholders and Sustainable Development I: A Theoretical Exploration of Business–Society Relations. Journal of Business Ethics 61(3), 263–281
Strauss, A., Corbin, J. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research, 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CT: Sage
Tanzil, D., Beloff, B. 2006. Assessing Impacts: Overview on Sustainability Indicators and Metrics: Tools for Implementing Sustainable Development in the Chemical Industry, and Elsewhere. Environmental Quality Management 15(4), 41–56
Veleva, V., Ellenbecker, M. 2001. Indicators of Sustainable Production: Framework and Methodology. Journal of Cleaner Production 9(6), 519–549
Veleva, V., Hart, M., Greiner, T., Crumbley, C. 2000. Indicators of Sustainable Production. Journal of Cleaner Production 9(5), 447–452
Walker, S. 2002. A Journey in Design: An Exploration of Perspectives for Sustainability. The Journal of Sustainable Product Design 2(1), 3–10
WCED: 1987, ‹Our Common Future’, Report of the World Commission of Environment and Development
Wood, L. M. 1996. Added Value: Marketing Basics. Journal of Marketing Management 12(November), 735–755
Yin, R. K. 1994. Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lindgreen, A., Antioco, M., Harness, D. et al. Purchasing and Marketing of Social and Environmental Sustainability for High-Tech Medical Equipment. J Bus Ethics 85 (Suppl 2), 445–462 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9740-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9740-1