Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Structure of a Rawlsian Theory of Just Work

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article outlines the structure of a Rawlsian theory of justice in the employment relationship. A focus on this theory is motivated by the role it plays in debates in business ethics. The Rawlsian theory answers three central questions about justice and the workplace. What is the relationship between social justice and justice at work? How should we conceive of the problem of justice in the economic sphere? And, what is justice in the workplace? To see fully what demands justice makes on the workplace, we should first spell out the implications that domestic justice has for working conditions. When this is done, we can develop a conception of workplace justice and investigate what content such local justice should have. John Rawls’s political liberalism was constructed for the specific problem of a just basic structure; in order to apply it to another problem the key theoretical concepts must be revised. Reasons for a specific construction of a local original position are given and arguments are presented in support of a principle of local justice, which takes the form of a choice egalitarian local difference principle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, S. 1974. “Social Evaluation Through Notional Choice.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 88, pp. 597-624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. S. 1999. “What is the Point of Equality.” Ethics 109, pp. 287-337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S. and J. Cavanagh. 2000. Top 200: The Rise of Corporate Global Power. (Washington, DC: Institute for Policy Studies).

    Google Scholar 

  • Arneson, R. 1989. “Equality and Equal Opportunity for Welfare.” Philosophical Studies 56, pp. 77-93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arneson, R. 1999. “Against Rawlsian Equality of Opportunity.” Philosophical Studies 93, pp. 77–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, B. 2005. Why Social Justice Matters. (Cambridge: Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boaz, D. 1997. LibertarianismA Primer. (New York: The Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, G. E. and A. Ockenfels. 2000. “ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition.” American Economic Review 90, pp.166-93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouckaert, B and G. De Geest (eds.) 2000. Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, Volume III. The Regulation of Contracts. (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S. 2004. MicroeconomicsBehavior, Institutions and Evolution. (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brousseau, E. and J. M. Glachant. 2002. The Economics of Contract. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cappelen, A., E. Ø. SØrensen and B. Tungodden: 2005, ‘Responsibility for What? An Experimental Approach to Responsibility and Fairness’, NHH Discussion Paper 15/05.

  • Charness, G. and M. Rabin. 2002. “Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 117, pp. 817-869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. and H. Gintis 1978. “Rawlsian Justice and Economic Systems.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 7, pp. 302-325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, G. A. 1989. “On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice.” Ethics 99, pp. 906-944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, N. (2002) Democratic Equality – Rawls’s Complex Egalitarianism. In: S. Freeman (ed.) Cambridge Companion to Rawls. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 241-276

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • De George, R. T. 2006. Business Ethics, 6th edition. (Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • DesJardins, J. R., and J. J. McCall. 2005. Contemporary Issues in Business Ethics. 5th edition. (Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, R. 1981. “What is Equality? Part 2: Equality of Resources.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 10, pp. 283-345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. 1992. Local Justice: How Institutions Allocate Scarce Goods and Necessary Burdens. (New York: Russell Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, D. W. 1978. Freedom Inside the Organization: Bringing Civil Liberties to the Workplace. (New York: McGraw-Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E. and A. Falk. 2002. “Psychological Foundations of Incentives.” European Economic Review 46, pp. 687- 724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E. and K. M. Schmidt. 1999. “A Theory of Fairness, Competition and Cooperation.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 114, pp. 817-868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, S. 2007. Rawls. (New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. 1962. Freedom and Capitalism. (Chicago: Chicago University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. C. 1975. “Can the Maximin Principle Serve as a Basis for Morality? A Critique of John Rawls’s Theory.” American Political Science Review 69, pp. 594-606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, O. 2002. “Norms and the Theory of the Firm.” In The Economics of Contract, Eric Brousseau and Jean Michel Glachant (ed.), (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 180 – 191.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, E. 2001. “Moral Philosophy, and Organizational Ethics: A Response to Phillips and Margolis.” Business Ethics Quarterly 11, pp. 673-685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. O. 1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, N-h. 2005. “Rawlsian Justice and Workplace Republicanism.” Social Theory and Practice 31, pp. 115-142.

    Google Scholar 

  • ILO: 1998, ‘The ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work’, http://www.ilo.org/dyn/declaris/DECLARATIONWEB.static_jump?var_language=EN&var_pagename=DECLARATIONTEXT. Accessed 23 October 2007.

  • Konow, J. 1996. “A Positive Theory of Economic Fairness.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 31, pp. 13-35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, L. 2007. “Dissolving the Moral Dilemma of Whistleblowing.” Journal of Business Ethics 76, pp. 413-426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, L. and S. O. Hansson. 2004. “Evaluating Workplace Inspections.” Policy and Practice in Health and Safety 2, pp. 77-91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukács, E. 2005. “The Economic Role of SMEs in World Economy, Especially in Europe.” European Integration Studies 1, pp. 3-12.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, O. 1996. “Desert and Wages.” Utilitas 8, pp. 205-221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P. and J. Roberts. 1992. Economics, Organization and Management. (Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. 1999. Principles of Social Justice. (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. 2004. “The Concept of Desert.” In Social Justice. M. Clayton and A. Williams (eds.) (Malden: Blackwell Publishing) pp. 186- 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moriarty, J. 2005a. “Do CEOs Get Paid Too Much?” Business Ethics Quarterly 15, pp. 257-281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moriarty, J. 2005b. “On the Relevance of Political Philosophy to Business Ethics.” Business Ethics Quarterly 15, pp. 455-473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave, R. A. 1974. “Maximin, Uncertainty, and the Leisure Trade-off.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 88, pp. 625-632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R. 1974. Anarchy, State and Utopia. (New York: Basic Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pava, M. L. 1998. “Religious Business Ethics and Political Liberalism: An Integrative Approach.” Journal of Business Ethics 17, pp. 1633-1652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pence, G. (1978). Towards a Theory of Work. Philosophical Forum 10(1-3), 307-320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, R. A., and J. D. Margolis. 1999. “Toward an Ethics of Organizations.” Business Ethics Quarterly 9, pp. 619-638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pogge, T. 1989. Realizing Rawls. (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. 1974. “Reply to Musgrave and Alexander.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 88, pp. 633-655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. 1985. “Justice as Fairness: Political not Metaphysical.” Philosophyand Public Affairs, 14, pp. 223-251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. 1996. Political Liberalism, 2nd edition. (New York: Columbia University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J.: 1999a, in S. Freeman (ed.), Collected Papers (Harvard University Press, Cambridge).

  • Rawls, J. 1999b. A Theory of Justice. Revised edition. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. 2001. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. (Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon, T. M. 1998. What We Owe to Each Other. (Cambridge: The Belknap of Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. (1981). Economics or Ethics? In S. McMurrin (ed.) Tanner Lectures on Human Values (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Parijs, P. (2003). Difference Principles. In S. Freeman (ed.). Cambridge Companion to Rawls (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandekerckhove, W. and M. S. R. Commers. 2004. “Whistle Blowing and Rational Loyalty.” Journal of Business Ethics 53, pp. 225-233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandenberghe, A.-S. (2000) Labor Contracts. In B. Bouckaert, G. DeGeest (eds.) Encyclopedia of Law and Economics III The Regulation of Contracts. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 541-560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, J. 1986. “John Rawls and the Social Minimum.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 3, pp.21-33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M. 1983. Spheres of JusticeA Defense of Pluralism and Equality. (New York: Basic Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, S. P., ed. 2004. Political Liberalism: Variations on a Theme. (New York: State University of New York Press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lars Lindblom.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lindblom, L. The Structure of a Rawlsian Theory of Just Work. J Bus Ethics 101, 577–599 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0740-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0740-1

Keywords

Navigation