Abstract
I first give a brief summary of a critique of the traditional theories of approximation and idealization; and after identifying one of the major roles of idealization as detaching component processes or systems from their joints, a detailed analysis is given of idealized laws – which are discoverable and/or applicable – in such processes and systems (i.e., idealized model systems). Then, I argue that dispositional properties should be regarded as admissible properties for laws and that such an inclusion supplies the much needed connection between idealized models and the laws they `produce' or `accommodate'. And I then argue that idealized law-statements so produced or accommodated in the models may be either true simpliciter or true approximately, but the latter is not because of the idealizations involved. I argue that the kind of limiting-case idealizations that produce approximate truth is best regarded as approximation; and finally I compare my theory with some existing theories of laws of nature.
We seem to trace [in KingLear] ... the tendency of imagination toanalyse and abstract, to decomposehuman nature into its constituentfactors, and then to construct beings in whomone or more of these factors isabsent or atrophied or only incipient
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Armstrong, D. M.: 1978, Universals and Scientific Realism, vol. 2: A Theory of Universals, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Armstrong, D. M.: 1983, What Is a Law of Nature? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Cartwright, N.: 1983, How the Laws of Physics Lie, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Cartwright, N.: 1989, Nature's Capacities and Their Measurement, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Cartwright, N.: 1999, The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Creary, L. G.: 1981, 'Causal Explanation and the Reality of Natural Component Forces', Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 62, 148‐157.
Earman, J. and J. Roberts: 1999, 'Ceteris Paribus, There is No Problem of Provisos', Synthese 118, 439‐478.
Hilpinen, R.: 1976, 'Approximate Truth and Truthlikeness', in M. Przlecki, K. Szanianwski and R. Wojicki (eds.), Formal Methods in the Methodology of Empirical Sciences, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 19‐42.
Hüttemann, A.: 1998, 'Laws and Dispositions', Philosophy of Science 65, 121‐135.
Kline, D. A. and C. A. Matheson: 1986, 'How the Laws of Physics Don't Even Fib', in P. D. Asquith et al. (eds.), PSA 1986, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, 1, 33‐41.
Kyburg, H. E. Jr.: 1990, Science and Reason, Oxford University, Oxford.
Laymon, R.: 1980, 'Idealization, Explanation, and Confirmation', in P. D. Asquith and R. N. Giere (eds.), PSA 1980, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, 1, 336‐350.
Laymon, R.: 1985, 'Idealizations and the Testing of Theories by Experimentation', in P. Achinstein and O. Hannaway (eds.), Observation, Experiment and Hypothesis inModern Physical Science, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 147‐173.
Laymon, R.: 1989, 'Cartwright and the Lying Law of Physics', Journal of Philosophy 86, 353‐372.
Lewis, D.: 1983, 'New Work for a Theory of Universals', Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61, 343‐377.
Liu, C.: 1999, 'Approximation, Idealization, and Laws of Nature', Synthese 118, 229‐256.
Liu, C.: 2001, 'Infinite Systems in SM Explanations: Thermodynamic Limit, Renormalization (semi-) Groups, and Irreversibility', Philosophy of Science 68(S), S325‐344.
McMullin, E.: 1985, 'Galilean Idealization', Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 16, 247‐273.
Mellor, H.: 1971, The Matter of Chance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Mellor, H.: 1974, 'In Defense of Dispositions', The Philosophical Review 83, 157‐181.
Mellor, H. and A. Oliver: 1997, Properties. (Oxford Readings in Philosophy), Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Mill, J. S.: 1874, A System of Logic, Harper & Brothers, New York.
Niiniluoto, I.: 1984, Is Science Progressive, Reidel, Dordrecht.
Niiniluoto, I.: 1998, 'Verisimilitude: The Third Period', The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49, 1‐29.
Nowak, L.: 1972, 'Laws of Science, Theories, Measurement', Philosophy of Science 39, 533‐548.
Nowak, L.: 1980, The Structure of Idealization: Towards a Systematic Interpretation of the Marxian Idea of Science, Reidel, Dordrecht.
Suárez, M.: 1999, 'The Role of Models in the Application of Scientific Theories: Epistemological Implications', in M. S. Morgan and M. Morrison (eds.). Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 168‐196.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, C. Laws and Models in a Theory of Idealization. Synthese 138, 363–385 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SYNT.0000016425.36070.37
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SYNT.0000016425.36070.37