Skip to main content
Log in

Concepts, categories, and epistemology

  • Epistemology and Cognitive Science
  • Published:
Philosophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andrews, J. and Livingston, D. (under review). Support for an extension of the exemplar model: Theoretical consequences of a test of alternative models of categorization.

  • Barsalou, L. (1985). “Ideals, central tendency, and frequency of instantiation as determinants of graded structure in categories”,Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 629–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, L. (1987). “The instability of graded structure: implications for the nature of concepts”. In U. Neisser (ed.),Concepts and Conceptual Development: Ecological and Intellectual Factors in Categorization, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 141–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D.T. and Fiske, D.W. (1959). “Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix”,Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chumbley, J., Sala, L. and Bourne, L. (1978). “Bases of acceptability ratings in quasinaturalistic concepts tasks”,Memory and Cognition, 6, 217–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, Patricia (1986).Neurophilosophy: Toward a Unified Science of the Mind-Brain, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT/Bradford books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, Paul (1985). “Reduction, qualia, and the direct introspection of brain states”,Journal of Philosophy, 82, 8–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, Paul (in press). “On the nature of theories: A neurocomputational perspective”. InMinnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, XIV.

  • Edelman, G. (1987).Neural Darwinism, New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehret, G. (1987). “Categorical perception of sound signals: Facts and hypotheses from animal studies”. In S. Harnad (ed.),Categorical Perception: The Groundwork of Cognition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estes, W. (1986). “Array models for category learning”,Cognitive Psychology, 18, 500–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. (1968).Psychological Explanation: An introduction to the philosophy of psychology, New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. (1984).The Modularity of Mind, Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franks, J. and Bransford, J. (1971). “The abstraction of visual patterns”,Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90, 65–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J.J. (1979).The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, A. (1986).Epistemology and Cognition, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnad, S. (1987). “Psychophysical and cognitive aspects of categorical perception: A critical overview”. In S. Harnad (ed.),Categorical Perception: The Groundwork of Cognition, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, J. and Lockhead, G. (1977). “Similarity as Distance: A structural principle for semantic memory”,Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 3, 660–678.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, D. (1986)The Evidence of the Senses, Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. (1987). “Cognitive models and prototype theory”. In U. Neisser (ed.),Concepts and Conceptual Development: Ecological and Intellectual Factors in Categorization, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 63–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingston, K. and Andres, J. (1987). “Reflections on the Relationship Between Philosophy and Psychology in the Study of Concepts: It There Madness in Our Methods?” Presented at the thirteenth annual meeting of the Society for Philosophy and Psychology, La Jolla, California.

  • Malt, B. and Smith, E. (1982). “Role of familiarity in determining typicality”,Memory and Cognition, 10, 69–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marrocco, R. (1986). “The neurobiology of perception”. In J.E. LeDoux and W. Hirst (eds.),Cognitive Neuroscience, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCauley, R. (1987a). “The role of theories in a theory of concepts”. In U. Neisser (ed.),Concepts and Conceptual Development: Ecological and Intellectual Factors in Categorization, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 288–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCauley, R. (1987b). “Comments on K.R. Livingston's and J.K. Andrews' ‘Reflections on the relationship between philosophy and psychology in the study of concepts: Is there madness in our methods?’” Presented at the thirteenth annual meeting of the Society for Philosophy and Psychology, La Jolla, California.

  • Medin, D. and Barsalou, L. (1987). “Categorization processes and categorical perception”. In S. Harnad (ed.),Categorical Perception: The Goundwork of Cognition, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medin, D. and Schaffer, M. (1978). “Context theory of classification”,Psychological Review, 85, 207–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medin, D. and Wattenmaker, W. (1987). “Category cohesiveness, theories, and cognitive archeology”. In U. Neisser (ed.),Concepts and Conceptual Development: Ecological and Intellectual Factors in Categorization, Cambridge: Cambridge University press, 288–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mervis, C. and Rosch, E. (1981). “Categorization of natural objects”,Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 89–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millikan, R.G. (1984)Language, Thought, and other Biological Categories: New foundations for realism, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT/Bradford Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, G. and Medin, D. (1985). “The role of theories in conceptual coherence”,Psychological Review, 92, 289–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U. (1976).Cognition and Reality: Principles and implications of cognitive psychology, San Fransisco: W. H. Freeman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U. (1987). “From direct perception to conceptual structure”. In U. Neisser (ed.),Concepts and Conceptual Development: Ecological and Intellectual Factors in Categorization, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 11–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, P. (1984). “An attribute frequency model for the abstraction of prototypes”,Memory and Cognition, 2, 241–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nosofsky, R. (1986). “Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship”,Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 39–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. and Keele, S. (1968). “On the genesis of abstract ideas.”,Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 353–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H. (1981).Reason, Truth and History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, S. (1972). “Patterns recognition and categorization”,Cognitive Psychology, 3, 382–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E. (1973). “On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories”. In T.E. Moore (ed.),Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language, New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E. (1975). “Cognitive representations of semantic categories”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 192–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E. (1978). “Principles of categorization”. In E. Rosch and B.B. Lloyd (eds.),Cognition and Categorization, Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E. and Mervis, C. (1975). “Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories”,Cagnitive Psychology, 7, 573–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. and Medin, D. (1981).Categories and Concepts, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. (1977). “Features of similarity”,Psychological Review, 84, 327–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1953).Philosophical Investigations, trans. G.E.M. Anscombe, New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Livingston, K.R. Concepts, categories, and epistemology. Philosophia 19, 265–300 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02380700

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02380700

Navigation