Skip to main content
Log in

The Public Has to Define Itself

  • Published:
Studies in Philosophy and Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the article texts by John Dewey, JürgenHabermas and Richard Rorty are discussed in thelight of different meanings of the Public. Thisis done by discussing foundational andnon-foundational claims on a philosophy ofpragmatism and democracy, and by looking atdifferent meanings of intersubjectivity. Onecrucial difference I am pointing at, is thatwhile Dewey's intersubjectivity is stemmingfrom philosophical arguments as well aspolitical, Habermas's intersubjectivity isrestricted to the level of (an almostscientific) philosophical abstractargumentation without any concrete language ofpolitics. When it comes to Rorty I stress thathe is far closer than Habermas to Dewey'spragmatism, especially his ambition to includethe specific individuals and to stressindividuality in a philosophy of communicationand public conduct.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Bernstein, R.J. (1985). Dewey, democracy: The task ahead of us. In J. Rajchman & C. West (Eds), Post-analytic philosophy (pp. 48–58). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, R.J. (1991). The new constellation-the ethical-political horizons of modernity/postmodernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1917/1991). The need for a recovery of philosophy. In R.Westbrook (Ed), John Dewey and American democracy. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1925/1958). Experience and nature. New York: Dover Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1927/1991). The public and its problems. Athens: Swallow Press, Ohio University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1929). The construction of good. In H.S. Thayer (Ed) (1982), Pragmatism-the classical writings (pp. 290–315). Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hacket Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1931). The development of American pragmatism. In H.S. Thayer (Ed) (1982), Pragmatism-the classical writing (pp. 23–40). Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hacket Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1938/1963). Experience and education. New York: Collier Books; London: Collier Macmillan Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1967/1991). Reconstruction in philosophy. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festenstein, M. (1997). Pragmatism and political theory. Cambridge UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutmann, A. (1996). Democracy, philosophy and justification. In S. Benhabib (Ed), Democracy and difference-contesting the boundaries of the political (pp. 340–359). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1992). Autonomy and solidarity, Peter Dews (Ed). London and New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horkheimer, M. (1947/1974). Eclipse of reason. New York: The Continuum Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joas, H. (1993). Pragmatism and social theory. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E. (1996). Deconstruction, pragmatism, hegemony. In C. Mouffe (Ed), Deconstruction and pragmatism. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C. (Ed) (1992). Dimensions of radical democracy. London & New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C. (Ed) (1996). Deconstruction and pragmatism. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1991). Consequences of pragmatism. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1996). Response to Ernesto Laclau. In C. Mouffe (Ed), Deconstruction and pragmatism. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1999). Achieving our country. Cambridge, Masachusetts; London, England.

  • Sandel, M.J. (1982). Liberalism and the limits of justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A.M. (1998). Laclau and Mouffe-the radical democratic imaginary. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thayer, H.S. (1981). Meaning and action-a critical history of pragmatism. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hacket Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thayer, H.S. (Ed) (1982). Pragmatism-the classic writings. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hacket Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trend, D. (Ed) (1996). Radical democracy. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellmer, A. (1985). Zur Dialektik von Moderne und Postmoderne. Vernunftkritik nach Adorno. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westbrook, R.B. (1991). John Dewey and American democracy. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ljunggren, C. The Public Has to Define Itself. Studies in Philosophy and Education 22, 351–370 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025127923809

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025127923809

Navigation