Abstract
In the article texts by John Dewey, JürgenHabermas and Richard Rorty are discussed in thelight of different meanings of the Public. Thisis done by discussing foundational andnon-foundational claims on a philosophy ofpragmatism and democracy, and by looking atdifferent meanings of intersubjectivity. Onecrucial difference I am pointing at, is thatwhile Dewey's intersubjectivity is stemmingfrom philosophical arguments as well aspolitical, Habermas's intersubjectivity isrestricted to the level of (an almostscientific) philosophical abstractargumentation without any concrete language ofpolitics. When it comes to Rorty I stress thathe is far closer than Habermas to Dewey'spragmatism, especially his ambition to includethe specific individuals and to stressindividuality in a philosophy of communicationand public conduct.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Bernstein, R.J. (1985). Dewey, democracy: The task ahead of us. In J. Rajchman & C. West (Eds), Post-analytic philosophy (pp. 48–58). New York: Columbia University Press.
Bernstein, R.J. (1991). The new constellation-the ethical-political horizons of modernity/postmodernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Dewey, J. (1917/1991). The need for a recovery of philosophy. In R.Westbrook (Ed), John Dewey and American democracy. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
Dewey, J. (1925/1958). Experience and nature. New York: Dover Publications, Inc.
Dewey, J. (1927/1991). The public and its problems. Athens: Swallow Press, Ohio University Press.
Dewey, J. (1929). The construction of good. In H.S. Thayer (Ed) (1982), Pragmatism-the classical writings (pp. 290–315). Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hacket Publishing Company.
Dewey, J. (1931). The development of American pragmatism. In H.S. Thayer (Ed) (1982), Pragmatism-the classical writing (pp. 23–40). Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hacket Publishing Company.
Dewey, J. (1938/1963). Experience and education. New York: Collier Books; London: Collier Macmillan Publishers.
Dewey, J. (1967/1991). Reconstruction in philosophy. Boston: Beacon Press.
Festenstein, M. (1997). Pragmatism and political theory. Cambridge UK: Polity Press.
Gutmann, A. (1996). Democracy, philosophy and justification. In S. Benhabib (Ed), Democracy and difference-contesting the boundaries of the political (pp. 340–359). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Habermas, J. (1992). Autonomy and solidarity, Peter Dews (Ed). London and New York: Verso.
Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Horkheimer, M. (1947/1974). Eclipse of reason. New York: The Continuum Publishing Corporation.
Joas, H. (1993). Pragmatism and social theory. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Laclau, E. (1996). Deconstruction, pragmatism, hegemony. In C. Mouffe (Ed), Deconstruction and pragmatism. London and New York: Routledge.
Mouffe, C. (Ed) (1992). Dimensions of radical democracy. London & New York: Verso.
Mouffe, C. (Ed) (1996). Deconstruction and pragmatism. London and New York: Routledge.
Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rorty, R. (1991). Consequences of pragmatism. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Rorty, R. (1996). Response to Ernesto Laclau. In C. Mouffe (Ed), Deconstruction and pragmatism. London and New York: Routledge.
Rorty, R. (1999). Achieving our country. Cambridge, Masachusetts; London, England.
Sandel, M.J. (1982). Liberalism and the limits of justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, A.M. (1998). Laclau and Mouffe-the radical democratic imaginary. London and New York: Routledge.
Thayer, H.S. (1981). Meaning and action-a critical history of pragmatism. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hacket Publishing Company.
Thayer, H.S. (Ed) (1982). Pragmatism-the classic writings. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hacket Publishing Company.
Trend, D. (Ed) (1996). Radical democracy. New York: Routledge.
Wellmer, A. (1985). Zur Dialektik von Moderne und Postmoderne. Vernunftkritik nach Adorno. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
Westbrook, R.B. (1991). John Dewey and American democracy. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ljunggren, C. The Public Has to Define Itself. Studies in Philosophy and Education 22, 351–370 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025127923809
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025127923809