Skip to main content
Log in

Consciousness: A connectionist manifesto

  • Published:
Minds and Machines Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Connectionism and phenomenology can mutually inform and mutually constrain each other. In this manifesto I outline an approach to consciousness based on distinctions developed by connectionists. Two core identities are central to a connectionist theory of consciouness: conscious states of mind are identical to occurrent activation patterns of processing units; and the variable dispositional strengths on connections between units store latent and unconscious information. Within this broad framework, a connectionist model of consciousness succeeds according to the degree of correspondence between the content of human consciousness (the world as it is experienced) and the interpreted content of the network. Constitutive self-awareness and reflective self-awareness can be captured in a model through its ability to respond to self-reflexive information, identify self-referential categories, and process information in the absence of simultaneous input. The qualitative “feel” of sensation appears in a model as states of activation that are not fully discriminated by later processing. Connectionism also uniquely explains several specific features of experience. The most important of these is the superposition of information in consciousness — our ability to perceive more than meets the eye, and to apprehend complex categorical and temporal information in a single highly-cognized glance. This superposition in experience matches a superposition of representational content in distributed representations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allport, Alan (1989), ‘Visual Attention’, in Michael Posner, ed.,Foundations of Cognitive Science, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 631–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P.S. and T.J. Sejnowski (1992),The Computational Brain, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P.M. (1993), ‘The Implications of Cognitive Neuroscience for Philosophy’, lecture at Trinity College.

  • Clark, Andy (1993),Associative Engines, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Austen (1993),Sensory Qualities, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. (1987), ‘Consciousness’, in Richard Gregory, ed.,Oxford Companion to the Mind, Oxford University Press.

  • Dennett, D. (1988), ‘Quining Qualia’, A.J. Marcel and E. Bisiach, eds.,Consciousness in Contemporary Science, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. (1991),Consciousness Explained, Little, Brown, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elman, J. (1989), ‘Structured Representations and Connectionist Models’,Program of the 11th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 17–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elman, J. (1990), ‘Finding Structure in Time’,Cognitive Science 14, 179–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elman, J. (1991), ‘Distributed Representations, Simple Recurrent Networks, and Grammatical Structure,’Machine Learning 7, 195–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdelyi, M.H. (1985),Psychoanalysis: Freud's Cognitive Psychology, Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, Owen (1992),Consciousness Reconsidered, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. and J. Breuer, (1895),Studies on Hysteria. Vol. 2 ofThe Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, ed. James Strachey, Hogarth Press, London, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, J. (1989), ‘The Myth of Jones and the Mirror of Nature: Reflections on Introspection’,Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 50, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinton, Geoffrey (1991), ‘The Unity of Consciousness: A Connectionist Account’, in W. Kessen, A. Ortony, and F. Craik, eds.,Memories, Throughts, and Emotions: Essays in Honor of George Mandler, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 245–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornik, K., M. Stichcombe, and H. White (1989), ‘Multilayer Feedforward Networks Are Universal Approximators’,Neural Networks 2, 359–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, Dan (1989),Simple Minds, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, Dan (1991), ‘Leaping to Conclusions: Connectionism, Consciousness, and the Computational Mind’, in T. Horgan and J. Tienson, eds.,Connectionism and the Philosophy of Mind, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, D. (1994), ‘Connectionist Hysteria: Reducing a Freudian Case Study to a Network Model,’ Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 2, 69–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, D. (1986),The Disappearance of Introspection, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelkin, N. (1989a), ‘Propositional Attitudes and Consciousness’,Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 49, 413–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelkin, N., (1989b), ‘Unconscious Sensations’,Philosophical Psychology 2, 129–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, W. (1994), ‘Internal Representations in Connectionist Theory: Do They Earn Their Explanatory Keep?’ paper presented at the Society for Philosophy and Psychology Annual Meeting, Memphis.

  • Rosenberg, C. (1987), ‘Revealing the Structure of NETtalk's Internal Representations’, inProgram of the Ninth Annual Conference of the Congitive Science Society, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D., J. McClelland, and the PDP Research Group (1986),Parallel Distributed Cognition: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D., Smolensky, P., McClelland, J., and Hinton, G. (1986), ‘Schemata and Sequential Thought Processes in PDP Models’, in J. McClelland and D. Rumelhart, eds.,Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition. Volume 2: Psychological and Biological Models, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, J.-P. (1937) (1957),Transcendence of the Ego. Farrar, Strauss, and Giroux, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, J.-P. (1953) (1966),Being and Nothingness, Washington Square Park, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sejnowski, T. and Rosenberg, C. (1987), ‘Parallel Networks That Learn to Pronounce English Text’,Complex Systems 1, 145–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Servan-Schreiber, D., A. Cleeremans, and J.L. McClelland (1991), ‘Graded State Machines: The Representation of Temporal Contingencies in Simple Recurrent Networks’,Machine Learning 7, 161–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. and A. Newell (1956), ‘Models: Their Uses and Limitations’, in L.D. White, ed.,The State of the Social Sciences, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smolensky, Paul (1988), ‘On the Proper Treatment of Connectionism’,Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Gelder, Timothy (1991), ‘What is the ‘D’ in ‘PDP’? A Survey of the Concept of Distribution’, in R.W. Ramsey et al., eds.,Philosophy and Connectionist Theory, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Gulick, Robert (1988), ‘Consciousness, Intrinsic Intentionality, and Self-Understanding Machines’, in A.J. Marcel and E. Bisiach, eds.,Consciousness in Contemporary Science, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velmans, M. (1991), ‘Is Human Information Processing Conscious?’,Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, 651–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegman, C. (1985),Psychoanalysis and Cognitive Psychology, Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lloyd, D. Consciousness: A connectionist manifesto. Mind Mach 5, 161–185 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00974742

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00974742

Key words

Navigation