Skip to main content
Log in

Confirmation of ecological and evolutionary models

  • Published:
Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper I distinguish various ways in which empirical claims about evolutionary and ecological models can be supported by data. I describe three basic factors bearing on confirmation of empirical claims: fit of the model to data; independent testing of various aspects of the model, and variety of evident. A brief description of the kinds of confirmation is followed by examples of each kind, drawn from a range of evolutionary and ecological theories. I conclude that the greater complexity and precision of my approach, as compared to, for instance, a Popperian approach, can facilitate detailed analysis and comparison of empirical claims.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beatty, J.: 1980, ‘Optimal-design Models and the Strategy of Model Building in Evolutionary Biology’,Philosophy of Science 47, 532–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, J.: 1981, ‘What's Wrong with the Received View of Evolutionary Theory?’,PSA 1980, Proceedings, Vol. II, Philosophy of Science Assoc., East Lansing, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, J.: 1982, ‘The Insights and Oversights of Molecular Genetic: The Place of the Evolutionary Perspective’,PSA 1982, Vol. I, Philosophy of Science Assoc., East Lansing, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C.: 1919,Life and Letters of Charles Darwin (Francis Darwin, ed.), Appleton, New York.

  • Darwin, C.: 1903,More Letters of Charles Darwin (Francis Darwin, ed.),Appleton, New York.

  • Darwin, C.: 1964,On the Origin of Species (1st edition facsimile), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J. M.: 1969, ‘Avifaunal Equilibria and Species Turnover Rates on the Channel Islands of California’,Proc. Nat. Sci. USA 64, 57–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, T.: 1970,Genetics of the Evolutionary Process, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N.: 1971, ‘The Allopatric Model and Phylogeny in Paleozoic Invertebrates’,Evolution 25, 156–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N. and S. J. Gould: 1972,Punctuated Equilibrium: An Alternative to Phyletic Gradualism, inModels in Paleobiology (T. J. M. Schopfied, (ed.)), Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giere, R.: 1985, ‘Constructive Realism’, in Paul M. Churchland and Clifford A. Hooker (eds.),Images of Science, University of Chicago Press.

  • Gould, S. J.: 1983, ‘The Meaning of Punctuated Equilibrium and It RRole in Validating a Hierarchical Approach to Macroevolution’, in R. Milkman, (ed.),Perspectives in Evolution, Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R. C.: 1974,The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, E.: 1983, ‘The Nature of Darwin's Support for the Theory of Natural Selection’,Philosophy of Science 50, 112–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, E.: 1983, ‘A Semantic Approach to the Structure of Population Genetics,Philosophy of Science 51, 242–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, E.: 1986a, ‘Thinking about Models in Evolutionary Theory’,Philosophica 37.

  • Lloyd, E.: 1986b, ‘Empirical Evaluation of Group Selection Debates’,Philosophy of Science Association Proceedings, Vol. I, 1986, Philosophy of Science Assoc., East Lansing, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, R. H. and E. O. Wilson: 1963, ‘An Equilibrium Theory of Insular Zoogeography’,Evolution 17, 373–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, R. H. and E. O. Wilson: 1967,The Theory of Island Biogeography, Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E.: 1963,Animal Species and Evolution, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E.: 1982,The Growth of Biological Thought, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oster, George F. and E. O. Wilson: 1978,Caste and Ecology in the Social Insects, Princeton University Press.

  • Platt, J. R.: 1964, ‘Strong Inference’,Science 146, 347–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J. F. and A. E. Dunham: 1983, ‘On Hypothesis Testing in Ecology and Evolution’,American Naturalist 122, 602–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roughgarden,J.: 1983, ‘Competition and Theory in Community Ecology’,American Naturalist 122, 583–601.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff, D.: 1983, ‘Competition Theory, Hypothesis Testing, and Other Community Ecological Buzzwords’,American Naturalist 122, 625–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff, D. and E. O. Wilson: 1969, ‘Experimental Zoogeography of Islands. The Colonization of Empty Islands’,Ecology 50, 278–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff, D. and E. O. Wilson: 1970. ‘Experimental Zoogeography of Islands. A Two-year Record of Colonization’,Ecology 51, 934–934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, S.: 1975, ‘A Theory of Evolution Above the Species Level’,Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 72 (2), 646–650.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, S.: 1979,Macroevolution: Pattern and Process, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong, D. R.: 1983, ‘Natural Variability and the Manifold Mechanisms of Ecological Communities’,American Naturalist 122, 636–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppe, F.: 1972, ‘What's Wrong with the Received View on the Structure of Scientific Theories?’Philosophy of Science 39, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppe, F. (ed.): 1977,The Structure of Scientific Theories (2nd edition), University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppes, P.: 1957,Introduction to Logic, Van Nostrand, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppes, P.: 1967, ‘What Is a Scientific Theory?’ in S. Morggenbesser (ed.),Philosophy of Science Today, Meridian, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Paul: 1985, ‘Sociobiological Explanation and the Testability of Sociobiological Theory’, in James H. Fetzer (ed.),Sociobiology and Epistemology, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P.: 1983, ‘The Structure of Evolutionary Theory: A Semantic Approach’,Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 14, 215–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toft, C. A. and P. J. Shea: 1983, ‘Detecting Communitywide Patterns: Estimating Power Strengthens Statistical Inference’,America Naturalist 122, 618–625.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Fraassen, B. C.: 1970, ‘On the Extension of Beth's Semantics of Physical Theories’,Philosophy of Science 37, 325–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Fraassen, B. C.: 1972, ‘A Formal Approach to the Philosophy of Science’, in R. Colodny (ed.),Paradigms and Paradoxes, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, M. J.: 1976, ‘Group Selection among Laboratory Populations ofTribolium’,Proc. Nat'l Acad. Sci. USA 73, 4604–4607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, M. J.: 1977, ‘An Experimental Study of Group Selection’,Evolution 31, 134–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, M. J.: 1978, ‘A Critical Review of the Models of Group Selection’,Quarterly Review of Biology 53 (2), 101–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. G.: 1966,Adaption and Natural Selection, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. and D. S. Simberloff: 1969, ‘Experimental Zoogeography of Islands. Defaunation and Monitoring Techniques’,Ecology 50, 267–278.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lloyd, E.A. Confirmation of ecological and evolutionary models. Biol Philos 2, 277–293 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00128834

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00128834

Key words

Navigation