Skip to main content
Log in

Advantages and disadvantages of the use of irradiation for food preservation

  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Food irradiation is a physical method of processing food (e.g. freezing, canning). It has been thoroughly researched over the last four decades and is recognized as a safe and wholesome method. It has the potential both of disinfesting dried food to reduce storage losses and disinfesting fruits and vegetables to meet quarantine requirements for export trade. Low doses of irradiation inhibit spoilage losses due to sprouting of root and tuber crops. Food- borne diseases due to contamination by pathogenic microorganisms and parasites of meat, poultry, fish, fishery products and spices are on the increase. Irradiation of these solid foods can decontaminate them of pathogenic organisms and thus provide safe food to the consumer. Irradiation can successfully replace the fumigation treatment of cocoa beans and coffee beans and disinfest dried fish, dates, dried fruits, etc. One of the most important advantages of food irradiation processing is that it is a coldprocess which does not significantly alter physico-chemical characters of the treated product. It can be applied to food after its final packaging. Similar to other physical processes of food processing, (e.g. canning, freezing), irradiation is a capital intensive process. Thus, adequate product volume must be made available in order to maximize the use of the facility and minimize the unit cost of treatment. Lack of harmonization of regulations among the countries which have approved irradiated foods hampers the introduction of this technique for international trade. Action at the international level has to be taken in order to remedy this situation. One of the important limitations of food irradiation processing is its slow acceptance by consumers, due inter alia to a perceived association with radioactivity. The food industry tends to be reluctant to use the technology in view of uncertainties regarding consumer acceptance of treated foods. Several market testing and consumer acceptance studies have been carried out on food irradiation in recent years. These studies showed that, if the safety and the benefits of food irradiation were properly explained, the consumers were willing to accept irradiated foods. Considering its potential role in the reduction of post-harvest losses, providing safe supply of food and overcoming quarantine barriers, food irradiation has received wider government approvals during the last decade. There is also a trend towards increased commercialization of irradiated food. Currently, there are 47 irradiation facilities in some 23 countries being used for treating foods for commercial purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acevedo, H. 1982. Economic impact of porcine cysticercosis. InCysticercosis, Present State of Knowledge and Perspectives, edited by A. Flisser, et al. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, M., A. Karim, M.A. Quaiyum, A.D. Bhuiya, M.A. Matin, A.K. Siddiqui, and M.M. Hossain. 1989. Economic feasibility studies on dried and cured fishery products, onions and potatoes. InRadiation Preservation of Fish and Fishery Products. Tech. Report Series No. 303. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous. 1989. Inter-American Meeting on Harmonization of Regulations Related to Trade in Irradiated Food, 27 November–1 December, 1989, Orlando, Florida, U.S.

  • Bruhn, C.M., and J.W. Noell. 1987. Consumer in-store response for irradiated papayas.Food Technology 41(9): 83–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickman, S. 1991. Compromise eludes EC.Nature 349: 273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1983. EPA Acts to ban EDB Pesticides.Environmental News. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, September 30, 1983.

  • Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). 1983.The Microbiological Safety of Irradiated Food. Codex Alimentarius Commission, Report CX/FH 83/9. Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1984.Codex General Standard for Irradiated Foods and Recommended International Code of Practice for the Operation of Radiation Facilities Used for the Treatment of Foods. Codex Alimentarius Commission, CAC/Vol. XV. Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Food Irradiation Newsletter. 1990. Compilation of information on market trials (1984–89),Food Irradiation Newsletter 14(1): 53–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddings, G.G. 1986. Summary of the Puerto Rico mango consumer test market initiated and coordinated by Isomedix, Inc.Food Irradiation Newsletter 10(2): 56–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). 1986.Report of a Task Force Meeting on Irradiation as a Quarantine Treatment, Chiang Mai, Thailand, 17–28 February 1986. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone Jr., J.W. 1990. Consumer willingness to purchase and to pay more for potential benefits of irradiated fresh food products.Agribusiness 6(2): 163–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matin, M.A., A.D. Bhuiya, M. Ahmed, A. Karim, S. Rahman, J. Khatoon, M.M. Hossain, S. Islam, M. Islam, M.R. Amin, M.A. Hossain, and A.K. Siddiqui. 1991. Studies on commercialization, storage and transportation of irradiated dried fish and onions. InAsian Regional Co-operative Project on Food Irradiation: Technology Transfer. Panel Proc. Series (under publication). Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moog, P. 1988. How to win consumer acceptance in the marketing of irradiated food. InFactors Affecting Practical Application of Food Irradiation, IAEA-TEC-DOC-544. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, R.M., and T. Roberts. 1985.Food Irradiation: New Perspectives on a Controversial Technology. Washington, DC: Office of Technology Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moy, J.H. 1983. Radurization and radicidation: fruits and vegetables. InPreservation of Foods by Ionizing Radiation. Vol. III, edited by E.S. Josephson and M.S. Peterson. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson, J.T.R., J.J. Licciardello, and L.J. Ronsivalli. 1983.Radurization and radicidation: fish and shellfish.

  • Prachasitthisak, Y., U. Pringsulka, and S. Chareon. 1989. Consumer acceptance of irradiated nham (fermented pork sausage).Food Irradiation Newsletter 13(1): 65–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, P. 1983. Radiation Preservation of Foods of Plant Origin. Part 1. Potatoes and other tuber crops.CRC Crit. Rev. Foods Sci. Nutri. 19(4): 327–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1984. Radiation Preservation of Foods of Plant Origin. Part 2. Onions and other bulk crops.CRC Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutri. 21(2): 95–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Food and Drug Administration (USFDA). 1990.US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Federal Register, 21 CFR Part 179, May 2, 1990.

  • Urbain, W.M. 1982. Considerations on economics and energy requirements of food irradiation applications in developing countries: Anticipated benefits of irradiation. InFood Irradiation for Developing Countries in Asia and the Pacific, IAEA-TECDOC-271. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1983. Radurization and radicidation: meat and poultry. InPreservation of Foods by Ionizing Radiation. Vol. III, edited by E.S. Josephson and M.S. Peterson. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (WHO). 1981. Wholesomeness of Irradiated Food. Report of a Joint FAO/IAEA/WHO Expert Committee. WHO Technical Report Series 659. Geneva: WHO.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1987.Report of a Task Force Meeting on the Use of Irradiation to Ensure Hygienic Quality of Food, Vienna, 14–18 July 1986. WHO/EHE/FOS/87.2. Geneva: WHO.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Loaharanu, P., Ahmed, M. Advantages and disadvantages of the use of irradiation for food preservation. J Agric Environ Ethics 4, 14–30 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02229144

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02229144

Keywords

Navigation