Skip to main content
Log in

Environmental and social risks, and the construction of “best-practice” in Australian agriculture

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Amongst the environmental and social externalities generated by Australian agriculture are a number of risks both to the health and safety of communities living near sites of agricultural production, and to the end consumers of agricultural products. Responses to these potential risks – and to problems of environmental sustainability more generally – have included a number of programs to variously: define “best-practice” for particular industries; implement “Quality Assurance” procedures; and encourage the formation of self-help community “Landcare” groups. Taken together, these programs appear to deal comprehensively with both the social and environmental risks associated with agricultural production and products. However, these programs may also be interpreted as strategies that actually encourage the further intensification of agriculture, while attempting to reassure consumers that their food is safe and that farmers are doing “all they can” to protect the environment. Investigation of the Australian cotton and beef industries illustrates a number of strategies that have become evident between farmers, agri-science agencies, and the retail sector to manage these risks and define good farming practices in ways that satisfy their own perceived interests. Contrary to the image, therefore, of “green consumption” that is emerging as an integrated concern for “clean” (and thereby “healthy”) and sustainably produced foods, it appears that mainstream agricultural industries have bifurcated these concerns in ways that distract attention from production and processing methods, leaving conflict over on-farm production methods a characteristic only of those industries believed to have direct health impacts on nearby communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barr, N. and J. Cary (1992), Greening a Brown Land: The Australian Search for Sustainable Land Use. Melbourne: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1992), Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1996), “Risk society and the provident state,” in S. Lach, B. Szerszynski, and B. Wynne (eds.), Risk Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology(pp. 27-43). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B. (1994), “Landcare: Recovering lost ground - from the semi-arid zone to Lake Pedder,” in D. Defenderfer (ed.), Landcare in the Balance, Proceedings of the 1994 Australian Landcare Conference, Vol. 2(pp. 27-33). Hobart: Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries Tasmania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burchell, G. (1993), “Liberal government and techniques of the self,” Economy and Society22(3): 267-282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buttel, F. (1994), “Agricultural change, rural society and the state in the late twentieth century: Some theoretical observations,” in D. Symes and A. Jansen (eds.), Agricultural Restructuring and Rural Change in Europe(pp. 13-31). Wageningen: Wageningen Studies in Sociology, 37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A. (1990), Landcare: Progress Across the Nation. National Landcare Facilitator First Annual Report. Canberra: National Soil Conservation Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. (1983), Rural Development: Putting the Last First. Essex: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. and J. Murdoch (1977), “Local knowledge and the precarious extension of scientific networks: A reflection on three case studies,” Sociologia Ruralis37(1): 38-60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R., G. Lawrence, M. Myers, and S. Lockie (1997), Local Best Practices Among Cotton Growers in Central Queensland: Second Milestone Report. Rockhampton: Rural Social and Economic Research Centre, Central Queensland University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, J. (1997), “Burgers give QA signs to farmers,” The Land(8 May): 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotton “Best-Practices”(undated).

  • Council for International Business Affairs (1995), Trade and Environment: The International Agenda and Its Implications for Australian Agriculture. Melbourne: Council for International Business Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, A. and T. De Lacy (1997), “Examining the assumptions underlying Landcare,” in S. Lockie and F. Vanclay (eds.), Critical Landcare(pp. 185-199). Wagga Wagga, NSW: Centre for Rural Social Research, Charles Sturt University - Riverina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P. (1988), Against Method. Revised ed. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field S. (1995), “Competency standards and professional development,” presented to Facilitating Our Future: A Conference on Facilitation in Landcare and Regional Development. Kooralbyn, Queensland.

  • Foucault, M. (1977), Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greider, T. and L. Garkovich (1994), “Landscapes: The social construction of nature and the environment,” Rural Sociology591): 1-24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1984), The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume One: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. (1993), “Encoding, decoding,” in S. During (ed.), The Cultural Studies Reader(pp. 90-103). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloppenburg, J. (1991), “Social theory and the de/reconstruction of agricultural science: Local knowledge for an alternative agriculture,” Rural Sociology56(4): 519-548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knopke, P. and J. Harris (1991), “Changes in input use on Australian farms,” Agriculture and Resources Quarterly3(2): 230-240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, G. (1996), “Contemporary agri-food restructuring: Australia and New Zealand,” in D. Burch, R. Rickson, and G. Lawrence (eds.), Globalization and Agri-food Restructuring: Perspectives from the Australasia Region(pp. 45-72). Aldershot: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, G. and F. Vanclay (1992), “Agricultural production and environmental degradation in theMurray-Darling Basin,” in G. Lawrence, F. Vanclay, and B. Furze (eds.), Agriculture, Environment and Society: Contemporary Issues for Australia(pp. 33-59). Melbourne: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levidow, L. and S. Carr (1997), “How biotechnology regulation sets a risk/ethics boundary,” Agriculture and Human Values14: 29-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockie, S. (1993), “Review article - Landcare in Victoria: Getting the job done,” Rural Society3(4): 16-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockie, S. (1997a), “Chemical risk and the self-calculating farmer: Diffuse chemical use in Australian broadcare farming systems,” Current Sociology45(3): 81-97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockie, S. (1997b), “Beyond a ‘good thing’: Political interests and the meaning of Landcare,” in S. Lockie and F. Vanclay (eds.), Critical Landcare(pp. 29-43). Wagga Wagga: Centre for Rural Social Research Key Papers No. 5, Charles Sturt University - Riverina.

  • Lockie, S., A. Mead, F. Vanclay, and B. Butler (1995), “Factors encouraging the adoption of more sustainable cropping systems in southeast Australia: Profit, sustainability, risk and stability,” Journal of Sustainable Agriculture6(1): 61-79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, N. (1992), “From paradigm lost to paradigm regained? The case for an actor-oriented sociology of development,” in N. Long and A. Long (eds.), Battlefields of Knowledge: The Interlocking of Theory and Practice in Social Research and Development(pp. 16-43). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J-F. (1990), “The postmodern condition,” in J. Alexander and S. Seidman (eds.), Culture and Society: Contemporary Debates(pp. 330-341). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEachern, C. (1992), “Farmers and conservation: Conflict and accommodation in farming politics,” Journal of Rural Studies8(2): 159-171.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, S. (1996), Cottoning On: Stories of Australian Cotton-Growing. Sydney: Hale and Iremonger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. and N. Rose (1990), “Governing economic life,” Economy and Society19(1): 1-31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mues, C., H. Roper and J. Ockerby (1994), Survey of Landcare and Land Management Practices 1992-93. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muetzelfeld, M. (1992), “Organizational restructuring and devolutionist doctrine: Organisation as strategic control,” in J. Marceau (ed.), Reworking the World: Organisations, Technologies and Cultures in Comparative Perspective(pp. 295- 316). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, J. and G. Lawrence (1996), “Consumer attitudes to genetically-engineered food products: Focus group research in Rockhampton, Queensland,” in G. Lawrence, K. Lyons, and S. Momtaz (eds.), Social Change in Rural Australia(pp. 290-311). Rockhampton: Rural Social and Economic Research Centre, Central Queensland University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penman, D. (1996), The Price of Meat. London: Victor Gollancz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Queensland Country Life(15 February 1996).

  • Queensland Country Life(18 April 1996).

  • Queensland Country Life(17 October 1996).

  • Queensland Country Life(8 May 1997).

  • Queensland Health (1991), Community Exposure to Insecticides in Emerald During the 1990-91 Cotton-Growing Season. Brisbane: Public Health Services, Queensland Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarsbrick, B. (1997), “The Role of Landcare Australia,” in Landcare Australia Yearbook 1996-97(p. 3). Sydney: Landcare Australia Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, K. (1994), Quick Poison, Slow Poison: Pesticide Risk in the Lucy Country. Sydney: Envirobooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Story, D. (1996), “Consumer driven cuts: Woolworth's philosophy,” Queensland Country Life(9 May): 11.

  • The Challenge(August 1993-April-June 1997).

  • The Land(21 August 1997).

  • Tovey, H. (1994), “Rural management, public discourses and the farmer as environmental actor,” in D. Symes and A. Jansen (eds.), Agricultural Restructuring and Rural Change in Europe(pp. 209-219). Wageningen: Wageningen Studies in Sociology, 37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanclay, F. and G. Lawrence (1995), The Environmental Imperative: Eco-Social Concerns for Australian Agriculture. Rockhampton: Central Queensland University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wensley, P. (1994), “Creating the future,” in D. Defenderfer (ed.), Landcare in the Balance, Proceedings of the 1994 Australian Landcare Conference, Vol. 2(pp. 87-99). Hobart: Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries Tasmania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, C. and J. Lund (1996), “Best-practice Taylorism: “Yankee speed-up” in Australian grocery distribution,” Journal of Industrial Relations38(2): 196-212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynne (1996), “May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide,” in S. Lash, B. Szerszynski, and B. Wynne (eds.), Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology(pp. 44-83). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lockie, S. Environmental and social risks, and the construction of “best-practice” in Australian agriculture. Agriculture and Human Values 15, 243–252 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007455700259

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007455700259

Navigation