Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Jamison, J.Christopher
and
Caldwell, Graham E.
1994.
Dual degree of freedom tasks: Flexion effect on supination/pronation response.
Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology,
Vol. 4,
Issue. 3,
p.
143.
Levin, Mindy F.
and
Feldman, Anatol G.
1995.
The λ model for motor control: More than meets the eye.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 4,
p.
786.
Patla, Aftab E.
1995.
The λ model: Can it walk?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 4,
p.
775.
Partridge, Lloyd D.
1995.
Let us accept a “controlled trade-off” model of motor control.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 4,
p.
773.
Fikes, Thomas G.
and
Townsend, James T.
1995.
Moving models of motion forward: Explication and a new concept.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 4,
p.
751.
Ostry, David J.
Laboissière, Rafael
and
Gribble, Paul L.
1995.
Command invariants and the frame of reference for human movement.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 4,
p.
770.
Fidelman, Uri
1995.
The lambda model and a hemispheric motor model of intentional hand movements.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 4,
p.
750.
Morasso, Pietro
and
Sanguineti, Vittorio
1995.
Kinematic invariances and body schema.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 4,
p.
769.
Pagano, Christopher C.
and
Bingham, Geoffrey P.
1995.
Spatial frames for motor control would be commensurate with spatial frames for vision and proprioception, but what about control of energy flows?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 4,
p.
773.
Gielen, C. C. A. M.
and
van Bolhuis, B.
1995.
Reciprocal and coactivation commands are not sufficient to describe muscle activation patterns.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 4,
p.
754.
Gottlieb, Gerald L.
1995.
Shifting frames of reference but the same old point of view.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 4,
p.
758.
Hodgson, Antony
1995.
The unobservability of central commands: Why testing hypotheses is so difficult.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 4,
p.
763.
Desmurget, Michel
Rossetti, Yves
and
Prablanc, Claude
1995.
Natural unconstrained movements obey rules different from constrained elementary movements.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 4,
p.
750.
Winters, Jack M.
1995.
How far should we extend the equilibrium point (lambda) hypothesis?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 4,
p.
785.
van Emmerik, R. E. A.
and
Wagenaar, R. C.
1995.
Equifinality and phase-resetting: The role of control parameter manipulations.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 4,
p.
783.
Hamm, Thomas M.
and
Han, Zong-Sheng
1995.
Is λ an appropriate control variable for locomotion?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 4,
p.
761.
Alexander, R. McN.
1995.
Tendon elasticity and positional control.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 4,
p.
745.
Loeb, Gerald E.
1995.
What can we expect from models of motor control?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 4,
p.
767.
Latash, Mark L.
1995.
Equilibrium-point control? Yes! Deterministic mechanisms of control? No!.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 4,
p.
765.
lngvaldsen, R.
and
Whiting, H.T.A.
1995.
Frameworks on shifting sands.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 4,
p.
764.