Skip to main content

The Problem of Identifying the System and the Environment in the Phenomenon of Decoherence

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: The European Philosophy of Science Association Proceedings ((EPSP,volume 1))

Abstract

The term “decoherence” generally refers to the quantum process that supposedly turns a pure state into a mixed state, which is diagonal in a well-defined basis. The orthodox explanation of the phenomenon is given by the so-called environment-induced decoherence (EID) approach (Zurek 1982, 1993, 2003; Paz and Zurek 2002), according to which decoherence results from the interaction of an open quantum system and its environment. The study of different physical models shows that, under certain circumstances, the reduced state of the open system rapidly diagonalizes in a basis that identifies the candidates for classical states. By contrast to non-dissipative accounts to decoherence, the EID approach is commonly understood as a dissipative approach: “if one believes that classicality is really an emergent property of quantum open systems one may be tempted to conclude that the existence of emergent classicality will always be accompanied by other manifestations of openness such as dissipation of energy into the environment” (Paz and Zurek 2002, 6).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bonifacio, Rodolfo, Stefano Olivares, Paolo Tombesi, and David Vitali. 2000. Model-independent approach to nondissipative decoherence. Physical Review A 61: 053802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calzetta, Esteban, Bei-Lok Hu, and Francisco Mazzitelli. 2001. Coarse-grained effective action and renormalization group theory in semiclassical gravity and cosmology. Physics Reports 352: 459–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castagnino, Mario. 2006. The equilibrium limit of the Casati-Prosen model. Physics Letters A 357: 97–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castagnino, Mario, and Olimpia Lombardi. 2004. Self-induced decoherence: A new approach. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 35: 73–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castagnino, Mario, and Olimpia Lombardi. 2005. Decoherence time in self-induced decoherence. Physical Review A 72: 012102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castagnino, Mario, Roberto Laura, and Olimpia Lombardi. 2007. A general conceptual framework for decoherence in closed and open systems. Philosophy of Science 74: 968–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castagnino, Mario, Sebastian Fortin, Roberto Laura, and Olimpia Lombardi. 2008. A general theoretical framework for decoherence in open and closed systems. Classical and Quantum Gravity 25: 154002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castagnino, Mario, Sebastian Fortin, and Olimpia Lombardi. 2010a. Suppression of decoherence in a generalization of the spin-bath model. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 43: 065304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castagnino, Mario, Sebastian Fortin, and Olimpia Lombardi. 2010b. Is the decoherence of a system the result of its interaction with the environment? Modern Physics Letters A 25: 1431–1439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daneri, Adriana, Angelo Loinger, and Giovanni Maria Prosperi. 1962. Quantum theory of measurement and ergodicity conditions. Nuclear Physics 33: 297–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, George, and Robert O’Connell. 2001. Decoherence without dissipation. Physics Letters A 286: 87–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frasca, Marco. 2003. General theorems on decoherence in the thermodynamic limit. Physics Letters A 308: 135–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gambini, Rodolfo, Rafael Porto, and Jorge Pullin. 2006. Fundamental spatio-temporal decoherence: A key to solving the conceptual problems of black holes, cosmology and quantum mechanics. International Journal of Modern Physics D 15: 2181–2185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harshman, Nathan, and Sujeeva Wickramasekara. 2007. Galilean and dynamical invariance of entanglement in particle scattering. Physical Review Letters 98: 080406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joos, Erich, Dieter Zeh, Carl Kiefer, Domenico Giulini, Joachim Kupsch, and Ion-Olimpiu Stamatescu. 1996. Decoherence and the appearance of a classical world in quantum theory. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardi, Olimpia. 2004. What is information? Foundations of Science 9: 105–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lombardi, Olimpia. 2005. Dretske, Shannon’s theory and the interpretation of information. Synthese 144: 23–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omnès, Roland. 1994. The interpretation of quantum mechanics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omnès, Roland. 1999. Understanding quantum mechanics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omnès, Roland. 2001. Decoherence: An irreversible process. arXiv:quant-ph/0106006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omnès, Roland. 2002. Decoherence, irreversibility and the selection by decoherence of quantum states with definite probabilities. Physical Review A 65: 052119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paz, Juan Pablo, and Wojciech Zurek. 2002. Environment-induced decoherence and the transition from quantum to classical. In Lecture notes in physics, Vol. 587, ed. Dieter Heiss, 77–140. Heidelberg-Berlin: Springer. Page numbers from arXiv:quant-ph/0010011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlosshauer, Maximilian. 2007. Decoherence and the quantum-to-classical transition. Heidelberg-Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sicardi Schifino, A.C., G. Abal, R. Siri, A. Romanelli, and R. Donangelo. 2003. Intrinsic decoherence and irreversibility in a quasiperiodic kicked rotor. arXiv:quant-ph/0308162.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Kampen, Nicolaas. 1954. Quantum statistics of irreversible processes. Physica 20: 603–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zurek, Wojciech. 1981. Pointer basis of quantum apparatus: into what mixture does the wave packet collapse? Physical Review D 24: 1516–1525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zurek, Wojciech. 1982. Environment-induced superselection rules. Physical Review D 26: 1862–1880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zurek, Wojciech. 1993. Preferred states, predictability, classicality and the environment-induced decoherence. Progress of Theoretical Physics 89: 281–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zurek, Wojciech. 1998. Decoherence, einselection, and the existential interpretation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A356: 1793–1821.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zurek, Wojciech. 2003. Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical. Reviews of Modern Physics 75: 715–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We want to thank Mauro Dorato, Giancarlo Ghirardi, Federico Laudisa, Miklós Rédei, Jos Uffink and the participants of the EPSA09 for their interesting comments. This chapter was supported by grants of CONICET, ANPCyT, UBA and SADAF, Argentina.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olimpia Lombardi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lombardi, O., Fortin, S., Castagnino, M. (2012). The Problem of Identifying the System and the Environment in the Phenomenon of Decoherence. In: de Regt, H., Hartmann, S., Okasha, S. (eds) EPSA Philosophy of Science: Amsterdam 2009. The European Philosophy of Science Association Proceedings, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2404-4_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics