Notes
The meaning of “cryptic” throughout the text must be heard in relation to the Heraclitean aphorism: “physis krupresthai philei”—“nature loves to hide” (fr. 123), see Diels (1996).
For a formulation of alētheia along these lines see Heidegger’s (1972).
Warnek himself identifies the tradition of readings within which this book should be situated. It belongs to the approaches taken up by such thinkers as: Schleiermacher, Gadamer, Strauss, Klein, Benardete and Sallis (213n.3).
Strauss suggests this in relation to Aristophantic comedy, particularly as it relates to Strauss’s own reading of the Republic. See Strauss (1964).
References
Diels, Hermann. 1996. Die Fragmente Der Vorsokratiker, vol. 1, 6th ed. Zürich: Weidmann.
Heidegger’s, Martin. 1972. The end of philosophy and the task of thinking. In On Time and Being, 71. New York: Harper and Row.
Strauss, Leo. 1964. The city and man, 62. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Long, C.P. Peter Warnek: Descent of socrates: Self-knowledge & cryptic nature in the platonic dialogues. Cont Philos Rev 45, 291–295 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-012-9214-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-012-9214-0