Skip to main content
Log in

Conjectures and manipulations: External representations in scientific reasoning

  • Articles
  • Published:
Mind & Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

What I call theoretical abduction (sentential and model-based) certainly illustrates much of what is important in abductive reasoning, especially the objective of selecting and creating a set of hypotheses that are able to dispense good (preferred) explanations of data, but fails to account for many cases of explanations occurring in science or in everyday reasoning when the exploitation of the environment is crucial. The concept of manipulative abduction is devoted to capture the role of action in many interesting situations: action provides otherwise unavailable information that enables the agent to solve problems by starting and performing a suitable abductive process of generation or selection of hypotheses. Many external things, usually inert from the epistemological point of view, can be transformed into what I call epistemic mediators, which are illustrated in the last part of the paper, together with an analysis of the related notion of “external representation”. Finally, some examples of computational programs that simulate geometrical reasoning are illustrated. The computational embodiment generates a kind of “squared” epistemic mediator: geometrical construction, as an example of epistemic mediator, is further mediated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boutilier, C. & Becher, V. (1995) Abduction as belief revision,Artificial Intelligence, 77, pp. 43–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, O. (1847)The first six books of the elements of Euclid in which coloured diagrams and symbols are used instead of letters for the greater ease of learners (London, William Pickering).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornuéjols, A., Tiberghien, A. & Collet, G. (2000) A new mechanism for transfer between conceptual domains in scientific discovery and education, in L. Magnani, N.J. Nersessian & P. Thagard (Eds), Special IssueModel-based reasoning in scientific discovery: Learning and discovery, Foundations of Science, 5, 2, pp. 129–55.

  • Galilei, G. (1989)Dialogues concerning the two chief world systems, translated by S. Drake, edited by M.R. Matthews (Indianapolis-Cambridge, Hackett), pp. 61–81; originally published 1632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelertner, H. (1959) Realization of a geometry theorem proving machine inInternational Conference on Information Processing (Paris, Unesco House), pp. 273–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gooding, D. (1990)Experiment and the making of meaning (Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gooding, D. & Addis, T.R. (1999) A simulation of model-based reasoning about disparate phenomena, in L. Magnani, N.J. Nersessian & P. Thagard (Eds.),Model-based reasoning in scientific discovery (New York, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers), pp. 103–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holyoak, K.J. & Thagard, P. (1995)Mental leaps. Analogy in creative thought (Cambridge, MA, MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. (1995)Cognition in the wild (Cambridge MA, MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1983)Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness (Cambridge MA, Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1929)Critique of pure reason, translated by N. Kemp Smith (London, MacMillan), reprint 1998; originally published 1787.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirlik, A. (1998) The ecological expert: Acting to create information to guide action, inProceedings of the 1998 Conference on Human Interaction with Complex Systems (HICS'98) (Piscataway NJ, IEEE Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, R.K. (1994) Understanding diagrammatic demonstrations, in A. Ram & K. Eiselt (Eds),Proceedings of the 16 th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (Hillsdale NJ, Erlbaum), pp. 572–6.

  • Lindsay, R.K. (1998) Using diagrams to understand geometry,Computational Intelligence, 9, 4, pp. 343–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, R.K. (2000a) Using spatial semantics to discover and verify diagrammatic demonstrations of geometric propositions, in S. O'Nuallian (Ed.),Spatial cognition (Amsterdam, John Benjamins), pp. 199–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, R.K. (2000b) Playing with diagrams, in M. Anderson, P. Cheng & V. Haarslev (Eds),Theory and Application of Diagrams: First International Conference (Berlin, Springer), pp. 300–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, R.K. (2002) Knowing about diagrams, in M. Anderson, B. Meyer & P. Olivier (Eds)Diagrammatic Representation and Reasoning (Berlin, Springer), pp. 29–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnani, L. (1992) Abductive reasoning: philosophical and educational perspectives in medicine, in D.A. Evans & V.L. Patel (Eds),Advanced models of cognition for medical training and practice (Berlin, Springer), pp. 21–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnani, L. (1999a) Model-based creative abduction, in L. Magnani, N.J. Nersessian & P. Thagard (Eds),Model-based reasoning in scientific discovery (New York, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers), pp. 219–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnani, L. (1999b) Inconsistencies and creative abduction in science, inAI and scientific creativity: Proceedings of the AISB'99 Symposium on Scientific Creativity, Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behaviour (Edinburgh, Edinburgh College of Art and Division of Informatics, University of Edinburgh), pp. 1–8.

  • Magnani, L. (2001a)Abduction, reason, and science, processes of discovery and explanation (New York, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers).

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnani, L. (2001b)Philosophy and geometry. Theoretical and historical issues (Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers).

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnani, L. (2002) Epistemic mediators and model-based discovery in science, in L. Magnani & N.J. Nersessian (Eds),Model-based reasoning: science, technology, values (New York, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers), pp. 305–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnani, L., Civita, S. & Previde Massara, G. (1994) Visual cognition and cognitive modeling, in V. Cantoni (Ed.),Human and machine vision: Analogies and divergences (New York, Plenum Publishers), pp. 229–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnani, L. & Dossena, R. (forthcoming) Perceiving the infinite and the infinitesimal world: Unveiling and optical diagrams and the construction of mathematical concepts,Foundations of Science.

  • Magnani, L. & Nersessian, N.J. (Eds) (2002)Model-based reasoning, science, technology, values (New York, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers).

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnani, L., Nersessian, N.J. & Pizzi, P. (Eds) (2002)Logical and computational aspects of model-based reasoning (Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers).

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M.R. (1989)The scientific background to modern philosphy (Indianapolis-Cambridge, Hackett).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M.S. & Morrison, M. (Eds) (1999)Models as mediators. Perspectives on natural and social science (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nersessian, N.J. (1998) Kuhn and the cognitive revolution,Configurations, 6, pp. 87–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nersessian, N.J. (1999) Model-based reasoning in conceptual change, in L. Magnani, N.J. Nersessian & P. Thagard (Eds),Model-based reasoning in scientific discovery (New York, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers), pp. 5–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A. (1990)Unified theories of cognition (Cambridge MA, Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D.A. (1993)Things that make us smart. Defending human attributes in the age of the machine (Reading MA, Addison-Wesley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C.S. (1955) Perceptual judgments, in C.S. Peirce,Philosophical Writtings of Perice, edited by J. Buchler (New York, Dover), pp. 302–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C.S. (1931–1958)(CP), Collected papers, 8 vols., edited by C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss (vols I–VI) & A.W. Burks (vols VII–VIII) (Cambridge MA, Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1974)Adaptation and intelligence (Chicago, The University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramoni, M., Stefanelli, M., Magnani, L. & Barosi, G. (1992) An epistemological framework for medical knowledge-based systems,IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 22, 6, pp. 1361–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelley, C. (1996) Visual abductive reasoning in archaeology,Philosophy of Science, 63, 2, pp. 278–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thagard, P. (1988)Computational philosophy of science (Cambridge MA, MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thagard, P. (1992)Conceptual revolutions (Princeton NJ, Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J. (1997) The nature of external representations in problem solving,Cognitive Science, 21, 2, pp. 179–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J. & Norman, D.A. (1994) Representations in distributed cognitive tasks,Cognitive Science, 18, pp. 87–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Magnani, L. Conjectures and manipulations: External representations in scientific reasoning. Mind & Society 3, 9–31 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02511863

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02511863

Keywords

Navigation