Skip to main content
Log in

Smoking in public: A moral imperative for the most toxic of environmental wastes

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cigarette smoke is the most dangerous of the toxic elements in our environment. Smoking is responsible for almost 500 000 deaths each year in the United States — more than any other environmental toxin. The medical evidence is clear, mainstream and sidestream smoke kills people, and anyone who participates in the spreading of this smoke is acting unethically. Yet, when there are no governmental laws that ban smoking in public, most business-people allow smoking in their places of business. These businesspeople are acting in an unethical manner, a manner which endangers customers and employees. This paper examines the impact on the environment of smoking in public and concludes that businesses must move quickly to ban smoking, or we will need nationwide, uniform legal restrictions to force ethical action in this critical area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • A Decision Maker's Guide to Reducing Smoking at the Worksite, Washington, D.C.: 1985, Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion and Office Smoking and Health, Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

  • ‘A Not-So-Happy Anniversary’ 1989, Time Magazine (January 23), 54.

  • American Lung Association: 1983 ‘Smoking at the Workplace: The Changing Legal Situation’, More Facts & Features for Nonsmokers & Smokers, New York: American Lung Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Anti-smoking Forces Make Gains In The Heart Of The Tobacco Belt’, 1988 Atlanta Constitution (February 8), 2A.

  • Carlson, Regina: 1986, ‘How Americans View Smoking in the 80's’, Toward a Smoke-Free Workplace, Paramus: The Respiratory Health Association, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Cigarettes: Still Big Business’, 1988, New York Times (June 12).

  • Colosi, Marco: 1988, ‘Do Employees Have the Right to Smoke?’, Personnel Journal (April), 72–79.

  • Douglass, Merrill: 1989, ‘Observations of Increases in Business at Restaurants that Ban Smoking’, Unpublished, Berry College.

  • Elie, Eric: 1988, ‘Puffing Up the Week’, The Atlanta Constitution (November 16) Cl.

  • ‘Even Smokers See Puffing by Others in a Harmful Light’, 1988, Atlanta Constitution (April 22) 6.

  • Georgia Public Code: ‘Offenses Against Public Health and Morals’, 16–12–2, Smoking in public places, p. 550.

  • Gibbs, Nancy: 1988, ‘All Fired Up Over Smoking’, Time (April 18), 64–71.

  • Gonzales, Monica and Edmondson, Brad: 1988, ‘The Smoking Class’, American Demographics (November), 34–59.

  • Harris, J. and Seymour, L.: 1983, ‘No-Smoking—Still Not a Sign of the Times at Work’, Journal of Occupational Health (July) 35, No. 7, 308–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, Mike: 1989, ‘Anti-Smoking Fervor of Past 25 Years Hasn't Snuffed Out Tobacco Industry’, Atlanta Constitution (January 14), 1E.

  • Levin-Epistein: 1986, ‘Where There's Smoke: Problems and Policies Concerning Smoking in the Workplace’, Bureau of National Affairs Special Report, Rockville, Md.: Bureau of National Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Marietta Board OKs Policy Banning Use of Tobacco in School’, 1988, Atlanta Constitution (August 16).

  • National Health and Medical Research Council: 1986, ‘Effects of Passive Smoking on Health’, Adelaide, South Australia: NHMRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Officials at the University of Louisville who thought they had Placated Kentucky Legislators Fuming Over a New Smoking Policy at the Campus Have Discovered They Were Wrong’, 1989 Chronicle of Higher Education (May 3), A23.

  • ‘Phillip Morris USA — Strategic Focus’, 1988, Phillip Morris Companies Inc. Annual Report 8.

  • ‘Study Finds Secondhand Smoke a Peril Even in Non-Smoking Areas of Planes’, 1989, Atlanta Constitution (February 9), 4A.

  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: 1987, ‘Percent Current Smokers 16+ Years of Age by Region, Division, State, and Sex’, Atlanta: Centers For Disease Control.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office on Smoking and Health: 1989, ‘Smoking and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General’, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velasquez, Manuel: 1988, Business Ethics: Concepts and Cases, 34–37 and 65–109.

  • Verespej, Michael: 1988, ‘Whose Rights?’, Industry Week (February 1), 39–44.

  • Yandel, Gerry: 1987, ‘Haze of Complaints Surrounds New S.C. Smoking Ordinance’, The Atlanta Constitution (December 3), 1E.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Dr. David M. Ludington is the Senior Professor of Business Administration at Culver-Stockton College in Missouri. Before teaching, he held management positions at the National Bank of Detroit and The University of Michigan. He was also a partner in a management consulting firm. He has published a number of articles in the areas of business ethics, strategic marketing and strategic management. He is currently finishing a book on business ethics. He also assists companies in developing an ethical orientation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ludington, D.M. Smoking in public: A moral imperative for the most toxic of environmental wastes. J Bus Ethics 10, 23–27 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383689

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383689

Keywords

Navigation