Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Natural Behavior, Animal Rights, or Making Money – A Study of Swedish Organic Farmers' View of Animal Issues

  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A questionnaire study was performed among Swedish organic livestock farmers to determine their view of animal welfare and other ethical issues in animal production. The questionnaire was sent to 56.5% of the target group and the response rate was 75.6%. A principal components analysis (exploratory factor analysis) was performed to get a more manageable data set. A matrix of intercorrelations between all pairs of factors was computed. The factors were then entered into a series of multiple regression models to explain five dependent variables. Respondents were well educated and had long experience of farming. 81% were full-time farmers. They generally had a very positive attitude towards organic animal husbandry. They considered allowing animals their natural behavior a central aim, which is in accordance with organic philosophy. Farmers tended to be less approving of concepts like animal rights, dignity, and intrinsic value. When analyzing correlations between the factors, two groups of farmers emerged that were only partially correlated, representing different attitudes and behavioral dispositions. These may be interpreted as two subpopulations of organic livestock farmers in Sweden: those who saw organic farming as a lifestyle (``pioneer attitude'') and entrepreneurs, who considered making money and new challenges more important. Their view of animal welfare differed. While the pioneers considered natural behavior a key issue, this was less important to the entrepreneurs, who also had a more approving attitude towards invasive operations such as castration and were more critical of the organic standards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Alrøe, H. F., M. Vaarst, and E. S. Kristensen, “Does Organic Farming Face Distinctive Livestock Welfare Issues?-A Conceptual Analysis,” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics14 (2001), 275-299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altieri, M. A., Biodiversity and Pest Management in Agroecosystems(Food Products Press, New York, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, R., Ekologiska jordbruksprodukter och livsmedel-Aktionsplan 2005[Organic Agricultural Products and Food-Action Plan 2005], Swedish Board of Agriculture, Report No. 2001: 11 (Jönköping, Sweden, 2001).

  • Anon., Animal Welfare on Organic Farms. Farm Animal Welfare-Current Research and Future Directions(European Commission, ISBN 92-894-3817-7, 2002), 16-17.

  • Berg, C., “Health and Welfare in Organic Poultry Production,” Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica42(4, Suppl. 95) (2001), 37-45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehncke, E., “Preventive Strategies as a Health Resource for Organic Farming,” in J. Isart and J. J. Llerena (eds.), Resource use in Organic Farming. Proceedings of the 3rd ENOF Workshop(Ancona, Italy, June 5-6 1997), 25-35.

  • Bohrnstedt, G. W. and D. Knoke, Statistics for Social Data Analysis, 3rd edn. (Peacock Publishers, Inc., Itasca, IL, 1994), 266-268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, J., Alternativer-natur-landbrug(Akademisk Forlag, Viborg, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn. (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Conford, P., The Origins of the OrganicMovement(Floris Books, Edinburgh, Great Britain, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Council Regulation, “Council Regulation (EEC) No. 2092/91 of 24 June 1991 on Organic Production of Agricultural Products and Indications Referring Thereto on Agricultural Products and Foodstuffs,” Official Journal L 198(22/07/1991), 1-15.

  • Council Regulation, “Council Regulation (EC) No. 1804/1999 of 19 July 1999 Supplementing Regulation (EEC) No. 2092/91 on Organic Production of Agricultural Products and Indications Referring Thereto on Agricultural Products and Foodstuffs to Include Livestock Production,” Official Journal L 222(24/08/1999), 1-28.

  • Danish Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries, “Action Plan II. Developments in Organic Farming,” English Summary (Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries, Danish Directorate for Development, Copenhagen, 1999) [available at: http://www.dffe.dk/in_english/index.htm].

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D. J. and W. R. Freudenberg, “Gender and Environmental Risk Concerns. A Review and Analysis of Available Research,” Environment and Behavior28(3) (1996), 302-339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, I. J. H. and D. Fraser, “Understanding Animal Welfare,” in M. C. Appleby and B. O. Hughes (eds.), Animal Welfare(Wallingford: CAB International, 1997), 19-31.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAWC, Interim Report on the Animal Welfare Implications of Farm Assurance Schemes(FAWC, London, 2001), 45.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO, Guidelines for the Production, Processing, Labeling and Marketing of Organically Produced Foods, GL 32-1999, Rev. 1-2001 (FAO, Rome, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fostvedt, I., Profesjonalitet, liv og visjoner[Professionalism, Life and Visions], Norwegian Centre for Organic Farming, Rapport 14 fra 30-bruksprosjektet (Tingvoll, Norway, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gliessman, S. R., Agroecology: Ecological Processes in Sustainable Agriculture(Ann Arbor Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, G. C. and S. J. Henson, Consumer Concerns about Animal Welfare and the Impact on Food Choice-The Final Report, EU FAIR CT98 3678 (University of Reading, Reading, UK, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg, H.-E., Konsumentundersökning om ekologisk produktion/KRAV[Consumer Survey on Organic Production/KRAV], LUI ref. number 30-7866 published 99-12-21 (1999) (available at: http://www.krav.se/arkiv/rapporter/luiund.pdf).

  • IFOAM, IFOAM Basic Standards for Organic Production and Processing(International Federation of Organic Movements, Tholey-Theley, Germany, 2002) (http://www. ifoam.org/standard/norms/ibs.pdf).

    Google Scholar 

  • IFOAM, IFOAM Recommendations for International Standards of Biological Agriculture, with Restricted Validity to 2 Years(September 1980) (copy received from Otto Schmidt in the IFOAM Standards Committee).

  • Jelkebring, K.,M. Alarik, Å. Odelros, E. Hagström, and L. Larsson, Växande marknad. Det aktuella marknadsläget för ekologiska livsmedel[Growing Market. The Current Market Situation for Organic Foods] (Ekologiska lantbrukarna, handout, June 2002) (available at: http://www.ekolantbruk.se/PDFer/vaxandemarknad.pdf).

  • Kaltoft, P., Naturetik som praksisbegrep. En undersøgelse af naturforståelse, praksis og viden i økologisk jordbrug, Skriftserie No. 5. PhD thesis, Department of Technology and Social Sciences, Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerlinger, F. N. and E. J. Pedhazur, Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research(Holt, Rinehard & Winston, New York, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindholm, S., Helhet och mångfald. Det ekologiska lantbrukets bärande idéer i relation till miljöetisk teori[Entirety and Manifoldness. The Basic Ideas of Organic Farming in Relation to Environmental Ethics]. Ph.D. dissertation, Acta Universitetis Agriculturae Sueciae, Agraria 272, Uppsala, Sweden (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund, V. and B. Algers, “Djurhälsa och djurvälfärd i ekologisk djurhållning [Animal Health and Welfare in Organic Animal Husbandry],” in B. Johansson (ed.), Är eko reko? Om ekologiskt lantbruk i Sverige(Formas Fokuserar 1, Formas, Stockholm, 2003), 63-72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund, V. and H. Röcklinsberg, “Outlining a Conception of Animal Welfare for Organic Farming Systems,” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics14 (2001), 391-424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund, V., S. Hemlin, and W. Lockeretz, “Organic Livestock Production as Viewed by Swedish Farmers and Organic Initiators,” Agriculture and Human Values19(3) (2002), 255-268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund, V., R. Anthony, and H. Röcklinsberg, “The Ethical Contract as a Tool in Organic Animal Husbandry,” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics17(1) (2004), 23-49.

    Google Scholar 

  • NAHWOA, Final Recommendations and Comments, Report to the European Union. Network for Animal Health and Welfare in Organic Agriculture, Final report from FAIR CT 4405 (2002). To be found at: http://www.veeru.reading.ac.uk/organic/NAHWOAConclusionsFinal.pdf

  • Niggli, U. and W. Lockeretz, “Development of Research in Organic Agriculture,” in T. V. Østergaard (ed.), Fundamentals of Organic Agriculture, Proceedings Vol. 1. 11th IFOAM International Scientific Conference August 11-15(Copenhagen, Denmark, 1996), 9-23.

  • Nordgren, P., Ekonomisk värdering av tillväxtstrategier för mjölkföretag[Economic Evaluation of Growth Strategies for Dairy Farms] (Report, Agroväst, Skara, Sweden, 2001), 23 pp. (to be found at: http://www.agrovast.se).

  • Steiner, R., Landwirtschaftlicher Kursus(Section for Natural Science of the Antroposophic Society, Dornach, 1929).

    Google Scholar 

  • Swedish Farmers' Federation, Sveriges Bönders Värdegrund för livsmedelsproducerande djur[Swedish Farmers' Value Basis for Livestock] (2002) (to be found at: http://www. lrf.se/miljo/index.htm).

  • Svenson, O., “Differentiation and Consolidation Theory: Decision Making Processes Before and After a Choice,” in P. Juslin and H. Montgomery (eds.), Judgment and Decision Making. Neo-Brunswikian and Process-Tracing Approaches(Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Mahwah, New Jersey, 1999), 175-197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vartdal, B. and A. Blekesaune, Sosiale sider ved økologisk jordbruk. Ein sosiologisk studie av omleggingsprosessen[Social Aspects of Organic Farming. A Sociological Study of the Conversion Process], Rapport 1/92 (Senter for Bygdeforsking, Trondheim, Norway, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, S. L. and S. K. Abramowitz, Data Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences Using SPSS(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, F., Reasoning with Statistics, 2nd edn. (Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynen, E., “Research Implications of a ParadigmShift in Agriculture: The Case of Organic Farming,” in A. K. Dragun and K. M. Jakobsson (eds.), Frontiers in Environmental Economics(Department of Economics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Report 119, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Østergaard, E., Ett skritt tilbake og to frem. En fenomenologisk studie av bønder i omstilling til økologisk landbruk[One Step Back and Two Forward. A Phenomenological Study of Farmers Under Conversion to Organic Farming], Doctor Scientiarum Theses 1998: 25 (Department of Horticultural and Crop Sciences, Agricultural University of Norway, Ås, Norway 1998).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Veterinary Institute, Pb. 8156 Dep., N-0033, Oslo, Norway

    Vonne Lund, Sven Hemlin & James White

Authors
  1. Vonne Lund
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sven Hemlin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. James White
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lund, V., Hemlin, S. & White, J. Natural Behavior, Animal Rights, or Making Money – A Study of Swedish Organic Farmers' View of Animal Issues. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17, 157–179 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JAGE.0000017393.31486.c2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JAGE.0000017393.31486.c2

Search

Navigation