Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Moral Dilemmas in Business Ethics: From Decision Procedures to Edifying Perspectives

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There have been many attempts during the history of applied ethics that have tried to develop a theory of moral reasoning. The goal of this paper is to explicate one aspect of the debate between various attempts of offering a specific method for resolving moral dilemmas. We contrast two kinds of deliberative methods: deliberative methods whose goal is decision-making and deliberative methods that are aimed at gaining edifying perspectives. The decision-making methods assessed include the traditional moral theories like utilitarianism and Kantianism, as well as second order principles, such as principlism and specified principlism. In light of this assessment, we suggest taking a closer look at two perceptive models, casuistry and particularism. These models are used for dealing with moral dilemmas that provide for edifying perspectives rather than decision-making. These perceptive models, though less scientific and not as good at prescribing an action, are more human in the sense that they enrich our moral sensibilities and enhance our understanding of the meaning of the situation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aristotle (1980). The Nicomachean Ethics Trans. W.D. Ross. Oxford University Press, Oxford, IV pp. 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp T. L., Childress J. F. (1994). Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody B. A. (1988). Life and Death in Decision Making. Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Calkins M. (2001). Casuistry and the Business Case Method. Business Ethics Quarterly 11(2):237–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Calkins M. (2002). Casuistry, Virtue Ethics, and Biotechnology. Business Ethics Quarterly 12(3): 305–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavangah G. F., Moberg D. J., Velasquez M. (1995). Making Business Ethics Practical. Business Ethics Quarterly 5: 299–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Dancy J.: 2000, The Particularist’s Progress, in B. Hooker and M. Little (eds.), Moral Particularism (Oxford University Press).

  • Dancy J.: 2004, Ethics without Principles (Oxford University Press).

  • DeGrazia D. (1992). Moving Forward in Bioethical Theory: Theories, Cases and Specified Principlism. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17(5):511–539

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher J. (2001). Lessons for Business Ethics from Bioethics. Journal of Business Ethics 34: 15–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foot P. (2002). Moral Dilemmas and Other Topics in Moral Philosophy. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault M.: 1988, Technologies of the Self: A seminar with Michel Foucault, in L. H. Martin, H. Gutman and P. H. Hutton (eds.), University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst

  • Gert B., Culver C., Clouser K. D. (2000). Common Morality versus Specified Principlism: Reply to Richardson. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25(3): 308–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geva A. (2000). Moral Decision Making in Business: A Phase-model. Business Ethics Quarterly 10(4): 773–803

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooker, B and Little M. (eds): 2000, Moral Particularism (Oxford, Clarendon Press).

  • Ilitis A. S. (2000). Bioethics as Methodological Case Resolution: Specification, Specified Principlism and Casuistry. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25(3): 271–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsen A. R., Toulmin S. (1988). The Abuse of Casuistry: A History of Moral Reasoning. University of California, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonsen A. R.: 1991, Of Balloons and Bicycles or the Relationship Between Ethical Theory and Practical Judgment. The Hastings Center Report Sept–Oct, v21, no. 5, p. 14(3).

  • Jonsen A. R. (2000). Strong on Specification. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25(3): 348–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaebnick E. G. (2000). On the Intersection of Casuistry and Particularism. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 10(4):307–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kant I. (1971). The Doctrine of Virtue: Part II of the Metaphysic of Morals. trans. Mary J. Gregor. University of Pennsylvania Press, Pennsylvania, p. 23

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuczewski M. G. (1997). Fragmentation and Consensus: Communitarian and Casuist Bioethics. Georgetown University Press, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre A. (1984). After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre A. (1988). Whose Justice? Which Rationality?. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill J. S.: 1962, Utilitarianism, On Liberty and Essay on Bentham, in M. Wanock (ed.) (Meridian Book, NY), p. 277.

  • McDowell J. (1979). Virtue and Reason. The Monist 62: 331–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum M. (1986). The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz J. (1986). The Morality of Freedom. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson H. S. (1990). Specifying Norms as a Way to Resolve Concrete Ethical Problems. Philosophy and Public Affairs 19: 279–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson H. S. (2000). Specifying, Balancing and Interpreting Bioethical Principles. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25(3): 285–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiner R.: 1988, Ethical Justification and Case-By-Case Reasoning, in D. Odegard (ed.), Ethics and Justification (Academic Printing and Publishing, Edmonton, AB)

  • Solomon R. C. (1993). Ethics and Excellence: Cooperation and Integrity in Business. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong C. (1997). Ethics in Reproductive and Prenatal Medicine: A New Framework. Yale University Press, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino L., Nelson K. (1990). Managing Business Ethics. John Wiley and Sons, NY, pp. 80–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Velasquez M. (2002). Business Ethics: Concepts and Cases. Prentice Hall, NJ, pp. 129–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace J. D. (1996). Ethical Norms, Particular Cases. Ithaca, Cornell University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins D. (1998). Needs, Values Truth 3rd Edition. Clanderon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams B. (1966). Consistency and Realism. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 40(supp): 1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Winch P. (1972). Ethics Actions. London, Routledge and Keagen Paul

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisdom J.: 1991, Proof and Explanation (University Press of America)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management, Ben-Gurion University, P.O. Box 653, Beer-Sheva, 84105, Israel

    Yotam Lurie

  2. Department of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Sapir College, D.N. Hof Ashkelon, 79165, Israel

    Robert Albin

Authors
  1. Yotam Lurie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert Albin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yotam Lurie.

Additional information

Yotam Lurie is a Senior Lecturer in Philosophy and Ethics at the Department of Management at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel. Lurie holds a Ph.D. in Philosophy from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. His research focuses on a variety of issues in applied ethics, particularly within the context of business and professional ethics.

Robert Albin is a Lecturer in Philosophy and Ethics and the Chair of the Department of Liberal Arts and Sciences at Sapir College, which is located in the Negev Region, Israel. He holds a Ph.D. in Philosophy from Ben-Gurion University of the Negev. Research interests are in the fields of Philosophy of Culture and applied ethics with a special interest in journalistic ethics. He published a book on the topic: A Chronicle of the Decline of Rationality: Ethics in the Practice of Journalism, 2004. (in Hebrew).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lurie, Y., Albin, R. Moral Dilemmas in Business Ethics: From Decision Procedures to Edifying Perspectives. J Bus Ethics 71, 195–207 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9134-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9134-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation