Skip to main content
Log in

Modern Infinitesimals as a Tool to Match Intuitive and Formal Reasoning in Analysis

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We discuss various ways, which have been plainly justified in the secondhalf of the twentieth century, to introduce infinitesimals, and we considerthe new style of reasoning in mathematical analysis that they allow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Albuquerque, L. G.: 1994, Collage des champs et phénomène canard, Thèse Mulhouse.

  • Callot, J. L. and T. Sari: 1983, in T. D. Landau (ed.), Stroboscopie infinitésimale et moyennisation dous les systèmes d'équations différentielles à solutions rapidement oscillentes, tome3, Editions du CNRS, pp. 345–353.

  • Callot, J. L.: 1992, ‘Trois leçons d'Analyse Infinitésimale’, in J. M. Salanskis (ed.), Le labyrinthe du continu, Springer France, Paris, pp. 369–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benoit, E., J. L. Callot, F. Diener, and M. Diener: 1981, ‘Chasse aux canards’, Collectanea Matematica 32(1-3), 37–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, F. and G. Reeb: 1989, Analyse Non Standard, Hermann, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, F.: 1992, ‘Deux exemples de formalisation au moyen de l'Analyse Non Standard’, in J. M. Salanskis (ed.), Le labyrinthe du continu, Springer France, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, M. and F. Diener (eds.): 1995, Non Standard Analysis in Practice, Universitext, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fillippov, A. F. M.: 1964, ‘Differential Equations with Dis(continuous) Right-Hand Sides’, Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 2(42), 199–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harthong, J.: 1983, ‘Eléments pour une théorie du continu’, Astérisque 109-110, 2, 234–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harthong, J. and G. Reeb (1989), ‘Intuitionisme 84’, in H. Barreau and J. Harthong (eds.), La mathématique non standard, éditions du CNRS, Paris, pp. 211–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I.: 1987, Matematicas, ciencia y epistemologia, Alianza Editorial, Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Laugwitz: 1992, ‘Leibniz' Principle and Omega Calculus’, in J. M. Salanskis (ed.), Le labyrinthe du continu, Springer France, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeb, P. A.: 1974, A Non Standard Representation of Borel Measure and Sigma-Finite Measures, Lecture Notes in Math. No. 369, Springer, pp. 144–152.

  • Lutz, R.: 1987, ‘Rêveries infinitésimales’, La Gazette des mathématiciens 34.

  • Lutz, R.: 1983, ‘L'intrusion de l'Analyse Non Standard dans l'étude des perturbations singulières’, Astérisque 2, 109–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, R.: 1992, ‘La force des théories infinitésimales faibles’, in J. M. Salanskis (ed.), Le labyrinthe du continu, Springer France, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, R.: 1998, L'enrichissement conceptuel pour enseigner l'analyse autrement, Quadrature 34, Editions du choix, Marseilles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, R. and M. Goze: 1981, Nonstandard Analysis: A Practical Guide with Applications, Lecture Notes in Math. No. 881, Springer.

  • Lutz, R., A. Makhlouf, and E. Meyer: 1996, Fondement pour un enseignement de l'analyse en termes d'ordres de grandeur: les réels dévoilés, Brochure APMEP 103, Paris.

  • Lutz, R. and T. Sari: 1982, ‘Applications of Nonstandard Analysis to Boundary Value Problems in Singular Perturbation Theory’, in W. Eckhaus and E. M. de Jager (eds.), Theory and Applications of Singular Perturbations, Lecture Notes in Math. No. 942, Springer, pp. 113–135.

  • Musio, M. and R. Lutz: 1994, A Finitisation of the Finitely Additive Probability Theory, Rend. Acad. Naz. delle Sc. detta del XL, mem. di Mat, 112, Vol. XVIII, Part 1, pp. 117–132.

  • Nelson, E.: 1977, ‘Internal Set Theory’, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 83, 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, E.: 1987, Radically Elementary Probability Theory, Ann. Math. Studies 117, Princeton University Press, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, E.: 1988, ‘The Syntax of Non Standard Analysis’, Ann. Pure and Appl. Logic 38, 123–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, F. A. J.: 1985, ‘L'arithmétique de Péano avec le prédicat standard’, in Mathématiques finitaires et Analyse Non Standard, Vol. VII, Public University, Paris, pp. 322–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peraire, Y.: 1995, ‘Théorie relative des ensembles internes’, Osaka J. Math. 29, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeb, G.: 1979, La mathématique non standard vielle de soixante ans, reproduced in J. M. Salanskis (1999), pp. 276–289.

  • Robert, A.: 1985, Analyse Non Standard, Presses Polytechniques Romandes, Lausanne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, A.: 1966, Nonstandard Analysis, North Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salanskis, J. M.: 1999, Le constructivisme non standard, Presses Univ. du Septentrion, Villeneuve d'Ascq.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sari, T.: 1983, ‘Sur la théorie asymptotique des oscillations non stationnaires’, Astérisque 2, 109–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Berg, I.: 1987, Nonstandard Asymptotic Analysis Lecture notes in Math. No. 1249, Springer.

  • van den Berg, I.: 1992, ‘Extended Use of I.S.T.’, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 58, 73–92.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lutz, R., Luis Gonzaga, L.G. Modern Infinitesimals as a Tool to Match Intuitive and Formal Reasoning in Analysis. Synthese 134, 325–351 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022152117818

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022152117818

Keywords

Navigation