Abstract
In a Swedish setting physicians are unlikely to give explicitly paternalistic reasons when asked about their attitudes towards patients’ involvement in decision-making. There is considerable risk that they will disguise their paternalism by giving ‘socially correct answers’. We suggest that disguised paternalism can be revealed with the help of indexes based on certain responses in postal questionnaires. The indexes were developed using material from a study examining attitudes of Swedish physicians to physician-assisted suicide (PAS). Apart from being asked about their attitudes, they were asked to prioritise between different arguments for and against PAS. One argument for PAS was: “PAS should be permitted out of respect for patients’ autonomy”. One argument against PAS was: “PAS should not be permitted since the non-maleficence principle in this case takes precedence over respecting patients’ autonomy”. Responses to the latter argument formed the cornerstone of a disguised-paternalism index, while an autonomy index was based on answers to the former argument. Applying our indexes to data from the PAS survey, we found that female GPs, surgeons, and older male physicians were least paternalistic. Among female physicians one finds both the most autonomy-respecting groups (female surgeons and GPs) and the least autonomy-respecting groups (female oncologists and psychiatrists); together with older male physicians in general, female GPs are the group displaying least disguised paternalism. We suggest that questionnaires exploring paternalism might be improved by including case-specific questions or statements by which to explore disguised paternalism. Here our indexes might be useful tools.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beach, M.C., M. Rosner, L.A. Cooper, P.S. Duggan, and J. Shatzer. 2007. Can patient-centredness attitudes reduce racial and ethnic disparities in care? Academic Medicine 82: 193–198.
Beauchamp, T.L., and J.F. Childress. 2009. Principles of biomedical ethics, 6th edition. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bremberg, S. 2004. Paternalism in general practice—physician’s power and patient’s autonomy. Lund: Lund University.
Duggan, P.S., G. Geller, L.A. Cooper, and M.C. Beach. 2005. The moral nature of patient-centredness: Is it ‘just the right thing to do’? Patient Education and Counseling 70: 271–276.
Falkum, E., and R. Förde. 2001. Paternalism, patient autonomy, and moral deliberation in the physician-patient relationship—attitudes among Norwegian physicians. Social Science and Medicine 52: 239–248.
Gillon, R. 2003. Ethics needs principles—four can encompass the rest–and respect for autonomy should be “first among equals”. Journal of Medical Ethics 29: 307–312.
Juth, N. 2005. Genetic information—values and rights: The morality of presymptomatic genetic testing. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
Kvale, S. 1989. To validate is the question. In Issues of validity in qualitative research, ed. S. Kvale, 151. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Lindblad, A., R. Löfmark, and N. Lynöe. 2008. Physician-assisted suicide: A survey of attitudes among Swedish physicians. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 36: 720–727.
Lynöe, N., K. Boman, H. Andersson, and M. Sandlund. 2004. Informed consent and participants’ inclination to delegate decision-making to the doctor. Acta Oncologica 43: 769.
Price, J., D. Price, G. Williams, and R. Hoffenberg. 1998. Changes in medical student attitudes as they progress through a medical course. Journal of Medical Ethics 24: 110–117.
Rydvall, A., T. Bergenheim, and N. Lynöe. 2007. Decision making in a life-threatening cerebral condition: A comparative study of the ethical reasoning of intensive care unit physicians and neurosurgeons. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 51: 1338–1343.
Savulescu, J. 1997. The trouble with do-gooders: The example of suicide. Journal of Medical Ethics 23: 108–115.
Stewart, M., J.B. Brown, A. Donner, et al. 2000. The impact of patient-centredness care on outcome. Journal of Family Practice 49: 796–804.
Taylor, K. 2009. Paternalism, participation and partnership—the evolution of patient centeredness in the consultation. Patient Education and Counseling 74: 150–155.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lynöe, N., Juth, N. & Helgesson, G. How to reveal disguised paternalism. Med Health Care and Philos 13, 59–65 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-009-9218-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-009-9218-7